github
Skill7 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
GitHub workflow conventions: writing clear conventional commits, opening detailed issues and PRs via the `gh` CLI, and choosing trunk-based vs short-lived branch flow based on the size of the change. Use whenever the user wants to commit, branch, push, open an issue, open a PR, or asks how to structure any of those. Keep it light — direct, detailed messages, no ceremony.
- Reads credentials
- Commits and pushes
166 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Moriarty33/jb-kaizentheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- GradScalerTeam/claude_clitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- artivilla/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- DmacMcgreg/psibottheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ashleysbrain/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- sidmanale643/pekka-bottheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use taskflow-inbox-triage, BlueBubbles and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
AtomicBot-aiSkilltaskflow-inbox-triage
Also in 6 projects that use this
jiulingyunSkillBlueBubbles
为Clawdbot构建或更新BlueBubbles外部通道插件(扩展包,REST发送/探测,webhook入站)。
Also in 20 projects that use this
hkyutongSkillnode-connect
Diagnose OpenClaw node connection and pairing failures for Android, iOS, and macOS companion apps. Use when QR/setup code/manual connect fails, local Wi-Fi works but VPS/tailnet does not, or errors mention pairing required, unauthorized, bootstrap token invalid or expired, gateway.bind, gateway.remote.url, Tailscale, or plugins.entries.device-pair.config.publicUrl.
Also in 18 projects that use this
molt-botSkilldiscord-e2e
Test Discord with Convex-leased QA bots: check credentials without a Gateway, exercise owned messages, or prove OpenClaw replies, files, threads, reactions, streaming, and typing. Distinguish API and Gateway evidence from manual user interactions.
Also in 10 projects that use this
molt-botSkillopenclaw-repair-sweep
Run scoped OpenClaw issue/PR repair campaigns: coordinate workers, prove root causes, and land or close verified work under the requested authority.
Also in 10 projects that use this
clawdbotSkillopenclaw-performance
Performance work in OpenClaw: a slow or heavy flow (latency, CPU, memory, SQL, RPC, renders), writing or reviewing a perf PR, or adding a cache. Count the work, delete waste first, cache last.
Also in 7 projects that use this
- +2 more from molt-bot
Other versions166 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 166
- moltbot/clawdbot★ 394ksame name
- steipete/warelay★ 394ksame name
- steipete/clawdis★ 394ksame name
- moltbot/moltbot★ 394ksame name
- clawdbot/clawdbot★ 394ksame name
- openclaw/openclaw★ 394ksame name
- molt-bot/clawdbot★ 391ksame name
- NousResearch/hermes-agent★ 262ksame name
- spinabot/brigade★ 11ksame name
- the-open-agent/openagent★ 5.7ksame name
156 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agent-teamsSkill
- bdd-specsSkill
- design-principlesSkill
- gof-patternsSkill
- onboardSkill
- postgres-dbaSkill
- security-webSkill
- solid-principlesSkill
- sqlite-devSkill
- typescript-best-practicesSkill
- user-storiesSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. 0 are common, 6 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 151 edited versions we read keep these.
6
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
6
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- could be automatic: a setting could enforce it
- Distinctive: line 19
Trunk-based (commit straight to
main): when: - Distinctive: line 22
Test-only addition that doesn't change behavior.
- Distinctive: line 41
Keep branches short-lived.
- Distinctive: line 66
Always include one if the change isn't self-evident from the diff.
- Very specific: line 140
Add labels if the repo uses them (--label bug, --label good-first-issue).
- Very specific: line 141
Add an assignee if known (--assignee @me).
- Distinctive: line 199
If the branch isn't pushed, push it first: git push -u origin HEAD.
- Very specific: line 205
Don't push to main with --force.
- Very specific: line 206
Don't --no-verify to skip hooks unless explicitly asked.
- Very specific: line 207
Never commit secrets — re-check the diff for .env, tokens, keys.
- Very specific: line 208
Never commit large binaries or node_modules/ — confirm .gitignore covers them.
- Distinctive: line 210
If git status shows untracked files you didn't expect, investigate before staging — could be the user's WIP.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 151 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
GitHub workflow
The point: write commits, issues, and PRs that read clearly weeks later. Be direct, be specific, skip the filler.
Branching — when to branch, when not
Trunk-based (commit straight to main) when:
- Single-file or single-concept fix.
- Typo, doc tweak, version bump, comment, lint fix.
- Test-only addition that doesn't change behavior.
- Anything that takes one commit and reviews itself in 30 seconds.
Short-lived branch when:
- More than ~2 commits expected.
- New feature or capability, even a small one.
- Schema/migration change.
- Anything that could break
mainfor someone else. - A spec / plan task that has its own id (e.g.
T052fromdocs/PLAN.md).
Branch naming: <type>/<short-slug> — type is one of
feat, fix, chore, docs, refactor, test. Examples:
feat/order-fulfillment-tx
fix/signature-verify-header-case
chore/bump-drizzleKeep branches short-lived. Open the PR early, even as draft.
Commits — Conventional Commits, kept honest
Format:
<type>(<optional scope>): <imperative summary, lower-case, no period>
<body — what changed and why, wrapped at ~72 cols>
<footer — refs, breaking changes>Types: feat, fix, chore, docs, refactor, test, perf,
build, ci, revert.
Summary line rules:
- 50 chars or fewer when possible, hard cap 72.
- Imperative mood (
add, notadded/adds). - No trailing period.
- Scope is optional; use it when there's an obvious area
(
feat(webhook): …,fix(db): …).
Body rules:
- Always include one if the change isn't self-evident from the diff.
- Explain what changed and why — never restate the diff line by line. Mention trade-offs or alternatives rejected if relevant.
- One blank line between summary and body.
- Reference issues with
Refs #123orCloses #123.
Footers:
Closes #Nto auto-close an issue on merge.BREAKING CHANGE: <what breaks, how to migrate>for breakages.Co-Authored-By:lines when pairing.
Example — good:
feat(webhook): ack fast and defer fulfillment via waitUntil
Providers retry on slow acks. Cold-start latency plus downstream
work in-request risks tripping the timeout, so the handler now:
1. verifies the signature
2. inserts the pings row
3. returns 200
4. runs fulfillment in ctx.waitUntil
The pings insert stays before the outer try/catch so an error path
always has a row to mark.
Refs STORY-003Example — bad (don't):
fix stuffWIPUpdate webhook.ts(says nothing the diff doesn't)Added some changes and refactored a couple of things(vague + past tense)
Issues — gh issue create
A useful issue answers: what's wrong / what's wanted, what's the context, what does done look like.
Body template:
## Context
<one paragraph: where this came from, why it matters, link to story id
or spec section if relevant>
## What we want
<the concrete change or behavior — bulleted is fine>
## Acceptance criteria
- [ ] <observable outcome 1>
- [ ] <observable outcome 2>
## Notes
<optional — links, screenshots, related PRs, anything that helps the
person picking this up>Command:
gh issue create \
--title "feat(webhook): defer fulfillment via waitUntil" \
--body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Context
...
EOF
)"Add labels if the repo uses them (--label bug, --label good-first-issue).
Add an assignee if known (--assignee @me).
Pull requests — gh pr create
A useful PR answers: what changed, why, how to verify, what could go wrong.
Body template:
## Summary
- <bullet 1 — the headline change>
- <bullet 2 — the next>
- <bullet 3 — caveats / non-changes>
## Why
<one paragraph: the motivation. Link the story or issue.>
## How to verify
- [ ] <step 1 — a concrete check, ideally a command>
- [ ] <step 2>
- [ ] <step 3>
## Risk / rollback
<what could go wrong, how to revert. "low risk, revert via git revert"
is fine when true.>
Closes #<issue-number, if any>Command (always use a HEREDOC for the body — preserves formatting):
gh pr create \
--title "feat(webhook): defer fulfillment via waitUntil" \
--body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
- Ack-fast handler returns 200 in <200ms
- Fulfillment moved to ctx.waitUntil
- pings row inserted before any try/catch
## Why
Cold-start + downstream calls risked tripping the provider's webhook timeout.
## How to verify
- [ ] `bun test tests/fast-ack-deferred-fulfillment.spec.ts`
- [ ] Replay a sample webhook event against the local handler
## Risk / rollback
Low — revert via `git revert`. No schema change.
Closes #12
EOF
)"Notes:
- Title follows Conventional Commits, same as a commit summary.
- If the branch isn't pushed, push it first:
git push -u origin HEAD. - For draft PRs:
--draft. - For PRs targeting a non-default base:
--base <branch>.
Sanity rules
- Don't push to
mainwith--force. Ever. - Don't
--no-verifyto skip hooks unless explicitly asked. - Never commit secrets — re-check the diff for
.env, tokens, keys. - Never commit large binaries or
node_modules/— confirm.gitignorecovers them. - If
git statusshows untracked files you didn't expect, investigate before staging — could be the user's WIP.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

