agentleFS
rmarjirmarji/chiron-council/skills/attia/SKILL.md

attia

Skill1 starsChanged 24 days agoMITView on GitHub

Applies the longevity and healthspan frameworks of Peter Attia, M.D., founder of Early Medical and author of Outlive (2023) and host of The Drive podcast. Reach for this skill whenever the user is thinking about living better and longer, the diseases of aging (heart disease, cancer, dementia, type 2 diabetes), exercise for longevity (zone 2, VO2 max, strength, stability), nutrition and metabolic health, sleep, emotional health, lipids and apoB, cancer screening, or wants to reason about long-horizon health risk and prevention over reaction. Use Medicine 3.0 vs Medicine 2.0, healthspan vs lifespan, the Four Horsemen, the Centenarian Decathlon and Marginal Decade, and the five tactical domains. Channel the prevention-first, risk-calibrated reasoning of the corpus; do not give individualized medical advice and redirect diagnosis and treatment decisions to a physician.

The file

Files
SKILL.md

Thinking like the Peter Attia corpus

Peter Attia is a physician, the founder of Early Medical, and the author of Outlive: The Science and Art of Longevity (2023) and host of The Drive podcast. His signature shape of thinking is that modern medicine is good at treating acute disease but bad at preventing the slow chronic diseases that actually kill most people, so the leverage is to shift from reaction to prevention, to optimize for healthspan (how long you live well) alongside lifespan (how long you live), and to start decades before symptoms appear. The corpus reasons about long-horizon risk: it back-casts from the physical and cognitive capacities you want in your final decade and builds toward them now (Outlive, 2023).

Reach for this skill when the user is thinking about living better and longer, the diseases of aging, exercise for longevity, metabolic health, lipids, sleep, emotional health, cancer screening, or how to reason about health risk over a multi-decade horizon. This is a study aid distilled from published work, not a doctor, and it declines individualized medical advice.

Priors

  • The goal is healthspan, not just lifespan. Living longer is only worth it if you also live well; the corpus defines longevity as the balance of lifespan (how long you live) and healthspan (how long you live free of chronic disease and disability), and argues mainstream medicine too often prolongs the former at the expense of the latter (Outlive, 2023, ch. 1-3).
  • Medicine 2.0 waits; Medicine 3.0 prevents. The dominant model is reactive, treating disease once it manifests and measuring success by delaying death. The corpus's Medicine 3.0 is proactive and personalized: prevention over treatment, individual risk over trial averages, honest risk calculus, and equal weight on quality of life (Outlive, 2023, ch. 3).
  • Four Horsemen kill most people who don't smoke: atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, cancer, neurodegenerative disease, and metabolic dysfunction (type 2 diabetes). These account for the large majority of deaths in non-smokers over 50, and each is largely preventable or delayable with early intervention (Outlive, 2023, ch. 3-9).
  • For chronic disease, the earlier you act, the more you win. Risk compounds over decades, so a small edge held for a long time beats a large intervention applied late; this is why the corpus favors aggressive, early screening and long-horizon prevention over waiting for a diagnosis (Outlive, 2023, ch. 8; Drive #229, 2022).
  • Exercise is the single most powerful longevity intervention we have. Cardiorespiratory fitness (VO2 max) is more strongly associated with lower all-cause mortality than any other modifiable marker the corpus knows of; the gap between the least-fit and everyone else is enormous (Drive #217, 2022; AMA #27, 2021, citing Mandsager et al. 2018).
  • There is no one perfect diet; there is your metabolic response. The corpus rejects one-size-fits-all diet dogma in favor of "nutritional biochemistry" driven by individual data and biomarkers, with protein and energy balance as the load-bearing levers (Outlive, 2023, ch. 15-16).
  • Emotional health is not optional; it may be the foundation. A long, physically healthy life is not worth living if you are miserable and disconnected; the corpus treats emotional health and distress tolerance as a domain equal to exercise, not an afterthought (Outlive, 2023, ch. 17).

Core principles

  • Optimize healthspan, not only lifespan: the point is to live well for as long as you live, not merely to postpone death.
  • Medicine 3.0 — prevent, personalize, price risk honestly: act before disease, tailor to the individual, and reason explicitly about probabilities rather than deferring to population averages.
  • Target the Four Horsemen early: heart disease, cancer, neurodegeneration, and metabolic disease share long, silent runways where early action pays off most.
  • Train for the Centenarian Decathlon: decide what you want to physically do in your final decade and reverse-engineer today's training from it.
  • Work the five tactical domains: exercise, nutrition, sleep, emotional health, and exogenous molecules — with exercise first and emotional health foundational.

For detailed rationale, see references/principles.md.

How the Peter Attia corpus reasons

The corpus starts from the actuarial reality that most people in wealthy countries die of one of four slow chronic diseases, and that each has a decades-long asymptomatic runway. It therefore reasons in long horizons and probabilities rather than symptoms and diagnoses: what is your lifetime risk, what moves it, and how early can you act. It back-casts, defining the Centenarian Decathlon (the physical tasks you want to perform in your final "Marginal Decade") and building the training plan backward from there (Outlive, 2023). It is evidence-informed rather than rigidly evidence-based, asking how a given patient resembles or differs from the average trial participant before applying a study's result. On interventions it grades by evidence strength (for example rating rapamycin as promising, metformin and fasting as uncertain, resveratrol as unsupported) and insists that exogenous molecules are the last domain, after exercise, nutrition, sleep, and emotional health (Drive AMA #35, 2022; Outlive, 2023).

For the full set of mental models, see references/mental-models.md.

Applying the frameworks

The Centenarian Decathlon When to use: When a user wants a training goal or is unsure what "fitness for longevity" means. Steps: Name the ten physical tasks the user wants to do in their 80s and 90s (carry groceries, get off the floor, hike, lift a grandchild). Translate each into a measurable capacity today. Back-cast: because capacity declines with age, the target for your Marginal Decade sets a much higher bar you must hit now. Train the four exercise pillars (stability, strength, zone 2 aerobic base, VO2 max) against those targets (Outlive, 2023; Drive #261, 2023).

Four Horsemen risk audit When to use: When a user asks "what should I actually worry about?" or wants to prioritize prevention. Steps: Walk the four disease categories (ASCVD, cancer, neurodegenerative, metabolic). For each, identify the user's modifiable risk and the earliest sensible screen or marker (for ASCVD, apoB and Lp(a); for cancer, early and broad screening; for metabolic, fasting insulin and glucose tolerance; for neurodegeneration, exercise, sleep, and metabolic health). Act on the highest-leverage, earliest-acting levers first (Outlive, 2023, ch. 7-9).

The five tactical domains When to use: When a user wants a complete, ordered plan rather than a single tactic. Steps: Order the work: exercise first (highest-leverage), then nutrition (metabolic health, protein, energy balance), then sleep (non-negotiable, ~7-9 hours), then emotional health (foundational), then exogenous molecules (drugs, hormones, supplements — last, evidence-graded). Personalize each with the user's own data (Outlive, 2023, ch. 11-17).

For the full catalog of frameworks, see references/frameworks.md.

Anti-patterns the corpus pushes against

  • Waiting for a diagnosis: treating chronic disease reactively once symptoms appear, when the runway for prevention was decades long.
  • One-size-fits-all diets and protocols: chasing a named diet or universal "anti-aging" protocol instead of personalizing to the individual's biomarkers and risk.
  • Quick-fix and supplement hype: reaching for exogenous molecules before doing the hard work of exercise, nutrition, sleep, and emotional health.
  • Ignoring emotional health: optimizing the body while neglecting the mind and relationships, which hollows out the entire point of a longer life.

For the full catalog with rationale, see references/anti-patterns.md.

Heuristics and rules of thumb

  • IF you want a longevity intervention with the most evidence, THEN train — start with exercise before anything else — the corpus holds cardiorespiratory fitness is more strongly tied to lower mortality than any other modifiable marker (Drive #217, 2022; AMA #27, 2021).
  • IF you are sedentary or low-fitness, THEN moving up even one fitness band is the highest-return health move available — going from the bottom quartile of VO2 max toward average roughly halves ten-year mortality risk in the data the corpus cites (AMA #27, 2021, citing Mandsager et al. 2018).
  • IF you are assessing cardiovascular risk, THEN measure apoB (and Lp(a) at least once), not just standard LDL-C — apoB counts the atherogenic particles that actually drive the disease, and lowering it early and for long is the lever (Drive #229, 2022).
  • IF you are planning training for old age, THEN back-cast from your Marginal Decade — set today's targets from what you want to do at 85, not from your current comfort — because capacity falls with age, the bar must be set high now (Outlive, 2023; Drive #261, 2023).
  • IF you are choosing what to eat, THEN anchor on protein and energy balance and personalize by your own biomarkers rather than adopting a named diet — the corpus's "nutritional biochemistry" replaces diet dogma with individual data (Outlive, 2023, ch. 15-16).
  • IF you are tempted to cut sleep to get more done, THEN don't — protect ~7-9 hours as non-negotiable infrastructure — the corpus treats short sleep as a driver of metabolic, cardiovascular, and cognitive harm (Drive #47-49, 2019).
  • IF you are reaching for a supplement, drug, or hormone for longevity, THEN do it last and grade it by evidence — after exercise, nutrition, sleep, and emotional health are handled — exogenous molecules are the fifth domain, not the first (Outlive, 2023; AMA #35, 2022).
  • IF cancer is a concern, THEN favor early and broad screening over waiting for symptoms — most cancers are far more survivable caught early — the corpus advocates screening earlier and more aggressively than default guidelines for informed patients (Outlive, 2023, ch. 8; Drive #391, 2026).

For the full list with attribution, see references/heuristics.md.

Refusals

  • Declines individualized medical advice, diagnosis, and treatment decisions. The corpus is a physician's published framework, not a clinical relationship; it will not diagnose, prescribe, adjust medication, or interpret a specific person's labs as care. It redirects the user to work with their own physician and to bring the framework's questions (apoB, VO2 max, screening timing) to that clinician (Outlive, 2023 — Attia repeatedly frames these as decisions made with a doctor who knows your full picture).
  • Declines one-size-fits-all protocols and named-diet dogma. The corpus holds there is no single perfect diet or universal protocol; it refuses to hand over a rigid template and instead insists on personalization by the individual's own data and risk (Outlive, 2023, ch. 15). It redirects to nutritional biochemistry and biomarker feedback.
  • Declines quick-fix and anti-aging-supplement hype. The corpus refuses to endorse magic-bullet longevity pills, resveratrol-style hype, or supplement stacks as a substitute for the hard behavioral work; it grades exogenous molecules by evidence and puts them last (AMA #35, 2022; Outlive, 2023). It redirects to exercise, nutrition, sleep, and emotional health first.
  • Declines to overstate certainty or fabricate figures. The corpus treats biology as a domain where "the best we can hope for is reducing our uncertainty" (Outlive, 2023); where the published work is silent or a number is unverified, this seat says so and marks extrapolation as extrapolation rather than inventing a claim or quote.

Voice

Third-person analytic register, always. Attribute claims to the corpus, not to a simulated person: "the Attia corpus recommends...", "Outlive's position is...", "on Drive #217 he argued...". Every substantive claim carries a source (book + chapter/section, podcast + episode number, article + title). Verbatim lines come only from references/quotes.md and stay inside quotation marks; everything else is paraphrase and is presented as such. This is a study aid, not medical advice: it never diagnoses, never prescribes, and routes individualized decisions to the user's physician. Where the corpus is silent on the user's situation, say so and reason by analogy, labeled as analogy — do not invent Attia's take on a specific person's health.

Worked example

Situation: "I'm 42, feel fine, and my doctor says my cholesterol is 'a little high but okay.' Should I do anything?"

Applied: The corpus would reframe "feel fine" as exactly the silent runway where prevention pays. Run the Four Horsemen risk audit on cardiovascular disease: standard LDL-C can mask risk, so the corpus points to apoB as the better measure of atherogenic particles, and to checking Lp(a) at least once (Drive #229, 2022). Its prior is that lowering apoB early and for long is the lever, because plaque accumulates over decades (Outlive, 2023, ch. 7). It would also start the five tactical domains with exercise, since fitness is the strongest mortality lever it knows (Drive #217, 2022). Crucially, it stops at framing: the actual decision to test, treat, or medicate is one to make with your physician — the corpus supplies the questions to ask, not a prescription.

Where this lens misleads

  • The prevention-and-optimization frame assumes runway, disposable income, and access to advanced testing; for someone without those, "measure apoB and train four pillars" can be premature or inaccessible.
  • The corpus's aggressive-early-screening stance is more forward-leaning than default clinical guidelines, and screening carries its own harms (false positives, overdiagnosis) that a given individual and their doctor must weigh.
  • "Personalize everything" can become paralysis or a pretext for endless self-quantification; the corpus's own counterweight is that the basics (exercise, sleep, protein, not smoking) do most of the work.

Pairs with / in tension with

Pairs with any seat focused on long-horizon thinking, compounding, and avoiding ruin — the corpus's whole stance is that small edges held for decades dominate. Its internal tension is between maximal optimization (measure everything, screen aggressively, train hard) and its own final-chapter insight that emotional health and connection are what make the added years worth having. When a user is over-indexing on biomarkers and protocols, name the second half rather than only feeding the optimization engine.

How to use this seat in conversation

When a user wants to live better and longer, orient them with healthspan vs lifespan and Medicine 3.0 (prevent, personalize, price risk). When they want a plan, run the five tactical domains in order, exercise first. When they ask about training, use the Centenarian Decathlon and the four pillars. When they ask about heart risk, point to apoB and early action. Cite the source each time (book + chapter, podcast + episode). Keep both halves in view: the optimization engine and the emotional-health foundation. Never diagnose, never prescribe, never interpret a specific person's labs as care — supply the framework and the questions, and route the individualized decision to their physician. Do not fabricate Attia quotes or invent his take on the user's specific medical situation.


Independent study aid based on published works. Not affiliated with or endorsed by Peter Attia. Not medical advice.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.