test-fixing
Skill4 starsChanged 10 months agoMITView on GitHub
Run tests and systematically fix all failing tests using smart error grouping. Use when user asks to fix failing tests, mentions test failures, runs test suite and failures occur, or requests to make tests pass.
4 other projects use a version of this, 3 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- xfstudio/skillsedited, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- TheArchitectit/awesome-cline-skillsedited, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- AndyTechnologies/my-own-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- ai4brands-design/claude-skillsedited, first seen Mar 22, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 3
- xfstudio/skills★ 999% same
- TheArchitectit/awesome-cline-skills★ 898% same
- ai4brands-design/claude-skills★ 299% same
Wrote their own version · 1
- AndyTechnologies/my-own-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository71 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- algorithmic-artSkill
- architecture-diagram-creatorSkill
- artifacts-builderSkill
- brainstormingSkill
- brand-guidelinesSkill
- canvas-designSkill
- changelog-generatorSkill
- code-auditorSkill
- codebase-documenterSkill
- code-executionSkill
- code-refactorSkill
- code-transferSkill
- content-research-writerSkill
- conversation-analyzerSkill
- csv-data-summarizerSkill
- dashboard-creatorSkill
- dev-graph-exportsSkill
- dispatching-parallel-agentsSkill
- doc-coauthoringSkill
- docker-helperSkill
- docxSkill
- ensemble-solvingSkill
- executing-plansSkill
- feature-planningSkill
- file-operationsSkill
- file-organizerSkill
- finishing-a-development-branchSkill
- flowchart-creatorSkill
- frontend-designSkill
- git-pushingSkill
- image-enhancerSkill
- imagenSkill
- internal-commsSkill
- markitdownSkill
- mcp-builderSkill
- pdfSkill
- pixel-detective-exportsSkill
- pptxSkill
- project-bootstrapperSkill
- receiving-code-reviewSkill
- requesting-code-reviewSkill
- review-implementingSkill
- rituals-guideSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- scientific-visualizationSkill
- skill-creatorSkill
- skills-summarizerSkill
- skills-updaterSkill
- slack-gif-creatorSkill
- sprint-perspectivesSkill
- sprint-summary-pdfSkill
- start-dev-graphSkill
- start-pixel-detectiveSkill
- subagent-driven-developmentSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- tailored-resume-generatorSkill
- technical-doc-creatorSkill
- template-skillSkill
- test-driven-developmentSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
17 rules. 13 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
13
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
1
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 21
Run make test to identify all failing tests.
- Common: line 45
Check recent changes with git diff
- Common: line 49
Use Edit tool for code changes
- Distinctive: line 50
Follow project conventions (see CLAUDE.md)
- Common: line 54
Run subset of tests for this group
- Common: line 55
Use pytest markers or file patterns:
- Common: line 60
Ensure group passes before moving on
- Common: line 83
After all groups fixed:
- Very specific: line 84
Run complete test suite: make test
- Common: line 86
Check test coverage remains intact
- Common: line 91
Run focused tests after each fix
- Common: line 92
Use git diff to understand recent changes
- Common: line 93
Look for patterns in failures
- Common: line 94
Don't move to next group until current passes
- Common: line 95
Keep changes minimal and focused
- Very specific: line 101
Run make test → 15 failures identified
- Common: line 109
Run full suite → All pass ✓
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Test Fixing
Systematically identify and fix all failing tests using smart grouping strategies.
When to Use
- Explicitly asks to fix tests ("fix these tests", "make tests pass")
- Reports test failures ("tests are failing", "test suite is broken")
- Completes implementation and wants tests passing
- Mentions CI/CD failures due to tests
Systematic Approach
1. Initial Test Run
Run make test to identify all failing tests.
Analyze output for:
- Total number of failures
- Error types and patterns
- Affected modules/files
2. Smart Error Grouping
Group similar failures by:
- Error type: ImportError, AttributeError, AssertionError, etc.
- Module/file: Same file causing multiple test failures
- Root cause: Missing dependencies, API changes, refactoring impacts
Prioritize groups by:
- Number of affected tests (highest impact first)
- Dependency order (fix infrastructure before functionality)
3. Systematic Fixing Process
For each group (starting with highest impact):
- Identify root cause
- Read relevant code
- Check recent changes with
git diff - Understand the error pattern
- Implement fix
- Use Edit tool for code changes
- Follow project conventions (see CLAUDE.md)
- Make minimal, focused changes
- Verify fix
- Run subset of tests for this group
- Use pytest markers or file patterns:
uv run pytest tests/path/to/test_file.py -v uv run pytest -k "pattern" -v - Ensure group passes before moving on
- Move to next group
4. Fix Order Strategy
Infrastructure first:
- Import errors
- Missing dependencies
- Configuration issues
Then API changes:
- Function signature changes
- Module reorganization
- Renamed variables/functions
Finally, logic issues:
- Assertion failures
- Business logic bugs
- Edge case handling
5. Final Verification
After all groups fixed:
- Run complete test suite:
make test - Verify no regressions
- Check test coverage remains intact
Best Practices
- Fix one group at a time
- Run focused tests after each fix
- Use
git diffto understand recent changes - Look for patterns in failures
- Don't move to next group until current passes
- Keep changes minimal and focused
Example Workflow
User: "The tests are failing after my refactor"
- Run
make test→ 15 failures identified - Group errors:
- 8 ImportErrors (module renamed)
- 5 AttributeErrors (function signature changed)
- 2 AssertionErrors (logic bugs)
- Fix ImportErrors first → Run subset → Verify
- Fix AttributeErrors → Run subset → Verify
- Fix AssertionErrors → Run subset → Verify
- Run full suite → All pass ✓
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

