project-context
Skill0 starsChanged 26 days agoMITView on GitHub
Maintain a concise, trustworthy PROJECT_CONTEXT.md map for a software repository. Use when onboarding to a repository, when the map is missing or stale, or after durable changes to architecture, commands, dependencies, services, workflows, feature ownership, or important file locations.
33 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- advait/effect-durable-agenttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- shinpr/ai-coding-project-boilerplatetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplatetheir own version, first seen Nov 7, 2026
- egorfedorov/claude-context-optimizertheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- OpenxIntelligence/Coding-Agent-Skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- I-Onlabs/claude-code-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use code-review.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
GoogleSkillcode-review
Adversarial systems, concurrency, memory-model, and architecture code review protocol. Use this skill whenever asked to review code, PRs, diffs, or branches in Filament.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions33 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 33
- shinpr/ai-coding-project-boilerplate★ 236same name
- egorfedorov/claude-context-optimizer★ 127same name
- TenureAI/PhD-Zero★ 52same name
- upex-galaxy/agentic-qa-boilerplate★ 26same name
- sergeeey/Claude-cod-top-2026★ 9same name
- perhapsspy/project-context★ 7same name
- advait/effect-durable-agent★ 4same name
- aida-core/aida-marketplace★ 4same name
- I-Onlabs/claude-code-skills★ 4same name
- IgorBabikov/Flowcairn★ 4same name
23 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- ask-panelSkill
- crew-diffSkill
- crewSkill
- evidence-contractSkill
- graphifySkill
- idea-researchSkill
- jcode-workersSkill
- lensSkill
- orchestrateSkill
- prd-reviewSkill
- recallSkill
- shapeSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 24 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 13
Do not create PROJECT_CONTEXT.md in $HOME, a temporary directory, a dependency or vendor tree, a generated directory, or an unrelated …
- Very specific: line 18
Read PROJECT_CONTEXT.md first when it exists.
- Distinctive: line 19
Treat it as a guide, not as ground truth.
- Distinctive: line 20
Verify claims relevant to the current task with targeted code and configuration reads.
- Distinctive: line 21
If it is missing in a real writable repository, perform a lightweight survey before creating it.
- Distinctive: line 32
Keep the document concise and navigational.
- Distinctive: line 36
Update the map in the same session when a completed change affects:
- Distinctive: line 45
Do not edit it merely to restate a small implementation detail that is obvious from the code.
- Distinctive: line 51
Check every new path and command against the repository.
- Distinctive: line 52
Remove stale statements discovered during the task.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 24 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Project Context
Maintain PROJECT_CONTEXT.md as a compact navigation map for future development sessions.
Safety boundary
- Find the actual repository root with
git rev-parse --show-toplevelor equivalent project evidence. - Do not create
PROJECT_CONTEXT.mdin$HOME, a temporary directory, a dependency or vendor tree, a generated directory, or an unrelated parent directory. - Preserve unrelated user changes. Do not overwrite useful project-specific documentation.
Start of work
- Read
PROJECT_CONTEXT.mdfirst when it exists. - Treat it as a guide, not as ground truth.
- Verify claims relevant to the current task with targeted code and configuration reads.
- If it is missing in a real writable repository, perform a lightweight survey before creating it.
What the map should contain
- A one-paragraph project purpose and architecture summary.
- Important source, test, configuration, documentation, migration, and deployment paths.
- Canonical install, build, lint, type-check, test, development, and deployment commands.
- High-level data flow and external service boundaries.
- Durable conventions, feature ownership, and debugging gotchas.
- Links to authoritative existing documentation instead of duplicated detail.
Keep the document concise and navigational. Exclude chat history, transient task status, speculative notes, generated inventories, and implementation logs.
Update triggers
Update the map in the same session when a completed change affects:
- architecture or data flow,
- important file locations,
- development, test, build, or deployment commands,
- dependencies or external services,
- durable feature behavior or ownership,
- conventions and recurring debugging knowledge.
Do not edit it merely to restate a small implementation detail that is obvious from the code.
Verification
Before finishing:
- Check every new path and command against the repository.
- Remove stale statements discovered during the task.
- Confirm the document remains compact enough to be useful as a first-pass map.
- Include the context-file change in the same focused commit as the durable code change when appropriate.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

