to-specs
Skill1 starsChanged 44 days agoMITView on GitHub
Turn approved direction into small, clear Feature specs.
2 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- rikilamadrid/lorekeeperword for word, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- sponge-b0b/Polaristheir own version, first seen Aug 3, 2026
Other versions2 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- rikilamadrid/lorekeeper★ 1100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 1
- sponge-b0b/Polaris★ 4same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository53 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- blog-post-redactorSkill
- challenge-meSkill
- debate-meSkill
- debug-issueSkill
- handoffSkill
- hooksmithSkill
- kickstart-pathfinderSkill
- learn-codebaseSkill
- learn-featureSkill
- learning-reviewSkill
- map-systemSkill
- orchestrateSkill
- prototypeSkill
- quiz-meSkill
- reflectSkill
- render-artifactSkill
- reverse-engineerSkill
- roleSkill
- setup-trackerSkill
- skillsmithSkill
- teach-architectureSkill
- teach-featureSkill
- ticketSkill
- to-specsSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- whereamiSkill
- blog-post-redactorSkill
- challenge-meSkill
- debate-meSkill
- debug-issueSkill
- handoffSkill
- hooksmithSkill
- kickstart-pathfinderSkill
- learn-codebaseSkill
- learn-featureSkill
- learning-reviewSkill
- map-systemSkill
- orchestrateSkill
- prototypeSkill
- quiz-meSkill
- reflectSkill
- render-artifactSkill
- reverse-engineerSkill
- roleSkill
- setup-trackerSkill
- skillsmithSkill
- teach-architectureSkill
- teach-featureSkill
- ticketSkill
- to-ticketsSkill
- whereamiSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
13 rules. About 0 are common, 9 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈9
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 18
Read the approved project context and relevant existing Features.
- Very specific: line 19
Stop if a required human decision is still TBD.
- Very specific: line 21
Create context/features/ if it does not exist.
- Very specific: line 22
Create each Feature from templates/feature-spec.template.md, named NN-feature-name.md — see Naming below.
- Very specific: line 28
Do not consult or write the ticket store.
- Distinctive: line 47
Prefer one Feature when the work is coherent.
- Distinctive: line 56
Prefer fewer Features and fewer artifacts.
- Distinctive: line 64
Do not invent unresolved decisions.
- Distinctive: line 65
Do not plan beyond the approved direction.
- Distinctive: line 66
Do not add workflow metadata that the Feature template does not require.
- Distinctive: line 67
Do not create tickets, tracker items, or extra planning files by default.
- Distinctive: line 68
Do not scan unrelated repository areas.
- Distinctive: line 70
When implementation details are unclear, inspect only enough source code to write an accurate Feature.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
To Specs
Turn approved direction into the minimum Feature specs needed to implement it.
Assumed role
Unless the human explicitly activated a role, assume planner for this
invocation: read roles/planner.md and follow it. An explicit role overrides
this default. A role narrows responsibility and never grants human authority.
Process
- Read the approved project context and relevant existing Features.
- Stop if a required human decision is still
TBD. - Decide whether the work is one Feature or needs a small number of Features.
- Create
context/features/if it does not exist. - Create each Feature from
templates/feature-spec.template.md, namedNN-feature-name.md— see Naming below. - Fill only information that materially helps implementation and review.
- Present the created Features and recommend which one to start first.
Recommend
to-ticketson that Feature as the next action: a Feature is planned work, and tickets are what a session executes. - Do not consult or write the ticket store. Feature specs stay in the
repository;
to-ticketsowns creating their executable tickets wherever the project keeps them.
Naming
A Feature spec is named NN-feature-name.md in the spec source, for example
context/features/27-export-saved-searches.md.
NN is the Feature number: the next unused number in the spec source, counting
every spec already there whatever its status. Numbers are never reused and never
renumbered, because every ticket of that Feature carries the number in its own
key — NN.TT — and renumbering would orphan all of them.
The number lives in the filename and nowhere else. The Feature template carries no number field, and nothing else in the spec records one.
Sizing
Prefer one Feature when the work is coherent.
Split only when separate outcomes:
- can be implemented or reviewed independently
- depend on meaningfully different context
- have a real dependency between them
- would make one Feature unnecessarily difficult to understand
Prefer fewer Features and fewer artifacts.
A Feature that is coherent but large is not two Features. It is one Feature
that to-tickets will slice into several tickets.
Rules
- Do not implement.
- Do not invent unresolved decisions.
- Do not plan beyond the approved direction.
- Do not add workflow metadata that the Feature template does not require.
- Do not create tickets, tracker items, or extra planning files by default.
- Do not scan unrelated repository areas.
When implementation details are unclear, inspect only enough source code to write an accurate Feature.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

