claude-delegate
Skill1 starsChanged 13 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Delegate a self-contained task to an INDEPENDENT Claude Code (`claude`) CLI session driven via tui-driver, then collect the result. Use when you want a fresh, isolated context window (so a large sub-task does not bloat your own context), genuinely parallel work you can fire-and-poll, or a second opinion from a separate Claude instance. NOT for normal in-session work — only reach for this when isolation or parallelism is the point. Trigger on: delegate to Claude, spawn a sub-Claude, independent Claude session, second opinion, isolated context, run this in a separate Claude, parallel Claude task, offload to another Claude.
4 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- lnopy96/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- amElnagdy/delegate-skillstheir own version, first seen Jul 29, 2026
- fergus/claude-kimi-delegatetheir own version, first seen Apr 30, 2026
- StoicEnso/openclaw-claude-delegatetheir own version, first seen Apr 19, 2026
Other versions4 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 4
- amElnagdy/delegate-skills★ 2.6ksame name
- fergus/claude-kimi-delegate★ 0same name
- lnopy96/claude-skills★ 0same name
- StoicEnso/openclaw-claude-delegate★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repositoryOne other file it gives its agents.
- antigravity-webSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
8 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.
3
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 21
Use tui-driver to drive a separate claude CLI session so you can hand it a self-contained task and collect the result without spending your …
- Distinctive: line 26
When this is the right tool:
- Distinctive: line 36
When NOT to use it: ordinary work in your current session, anything that needs your existing context, or trivial tasks.
- Very specific: line 109
Workflow: call send-async in one Bash call, then poll --wait in a second Bash call with run_in_background: true, and continue with other …
- Very specific: line 114
Only one send-async may be pending per session.
- Very specific: line 161
After responding, start a new poll --wait (in the background) to get the next state or the final result.
- Distinctive: line 194
Treat the sub-Claude's output as a colleague's report, not ground truth.
- Very specific: line 213
Inspect permission dialogs: before respond-ing; don't auto-approve.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Delegate to an Independent Claude Code Session
Use tui-driver to drive a separate claude CLI session so you can hand it
a self-contained task and collect the result without spending your own context
window on the work. The driven session is a fully independent Claude instance:
its own context, its own working directory, its own tool calls.
When this is the right tool:
- Isolated context — a big, noisy sub-task (read 40 files, summarize a huge log, explore an unfamiliar subsystem) whose intermediate work you don't want in your own transcript. The sub-Claude does the slog; you keep just the answer.
- Parallel work — fire the task with
send-async, runpoll --waitin the background, and keep working. You're notified when it's done. - Second opinion — pose a design/debugging question to a fresh instance with no priming from your conversation.
When NOT to use it: ordinary work in your current session, anything that needs your existing context, or trivial tasks. Spawning a sub-Claude is heavier and has a real cost (see below).
Cost & resources — same plan as this session, not a separate bill
A driven claude session runs under the same Claude Code authentication as
the session you're already in (your subscription, or your API key). It is
not a separate or extra bill — it draws from the same usage and rate-limit
pool this session already uses. (This is unlike headless claude -p one-shots,
which some setups meter per invocation; driving the interactive TUI is just
another Claude Code session on your existing login.)
What it does cost: a second concurrent Claude consumes that shared rate
limit / plan quota faster and adds startup + token overhead. So reserve it for
genuine isolation or parallelism, don't spin them up in tight loops, and stop
each one when done so it isn't left running.
Session Management
# Start an independent claude session in the current directory
tui-driver claude start
# ...or in a specific directory (the sub-Claude's working dir)
tui-driver --dir /path/to/project claude start
# When fully done, stop it (do not leave it running — it costs)
tui-driver claude stopHandle the startup prompt. On first launch in a directory claude may show
a trust/onboarding dialog ("Do you trust the files in this folder?"). After
start, peek once and clear it if present:
tui-driver claude raw # one look: is a trust/onboarding dialog showing?
tui-driver claude respond "" # press Enter to accept the default, if soParallel / multiple delegates. The default session is keyed on
command+directory, so a second tui-driver claude start in the same directory
is refused. To run several independent sub-Claudes, give each its own session:
tui-driver --session claude-a claude start
tui-driver --session claude-b claude start
# pass the SAME --session NAME to every send/poll/respond/stop for that oneRecovering a stuck or orphaned session
tui-driver list # every session + state (all dirs)
tui-driver claude reap # clear crashed/idle orphans only
tui-driver claude stop && tui-driver claude start # force a clean restartreap never touches a live or recently-active session.
Delegating a Task (Async Pattern)
Always use send-async + poll --wait (run in background). A real Claude
Code task can take minutes (it reads files, runs tools), so never block on it.
# Step 1: Fire the task (returns immediately)
tui-driver claude send-async "<self-contained task — see prompt tips below>"
# Step 2: Wait for the result in a SEPARATE Bash call with run_in_background=true
TUI_TIMEOUT=900 tui-driver -q claude poll --waitWorkflow: call send-async in one Bash call, then poll --wait in a second
Bash call with run_in_background: true, and continue with other work — you'll
be notified when the result arrives.
How poll behaves (so you don't get stuck):
- Only one
send-asyncmay be pending per session. Sending another while one is pending fails withalready pendinguntil you retrieve the result. Retrieving the result is what releases the lock. - A single
pollis self-contained: one call returns the whole response when the screen is stable (exit 0), orwaiting(exit 2) if still working. You never need to callpolltwice in a row. - A timeout (exit 3) does not lose the task — it stays pending. Poll again
(or with a larger
TUI_TIMEOUT) for the rest, or drop it withtui-driver claude cancel. - To check on a running task without retrieving it, use
tui-driver claude progress(read-only: pending?, elapsed, screen changing?, last screen lines). Never userawfor monitoring; it's for debugging a session that already misbehaves. - Exit codes:
0ready,1hard error (reason on stderr even with-q),2still working,3timeout.
Long tasks need a bigger timeout. The default TUI_TIMEOUT is 300s. A
substantial coding/exploration task can exceed that — set TUI_TIMEOUT (e.g.
900 or more) on the poll --wait call. If output gets clipped or never
settles, raise TUI_STABLE (more consecutive stable samples) too.
Exact completion marker (recommended for delegates). Since you control
the delegate's prompt, ask it to end with a marker and pass --until — the
result returns the moment it's done, with no risk of a mid-task pause being
mistaken for completion:
tui-driver claude send-async "…do the task… When completely finished, print the word DONE followed by three exclamation marks on its own line."
TUI_TIMEOUT=900 tui-driver -q --until 'DONE!!!' claude poll --wait(Describe the marker in the prompt rather than spelling it out, so the echo of your own prompt can't match the pattern.)
Handling the Sub-Claude's Permission Prompts
A driven claude will pause on tool-permission dialogs (edit a file, run a
command, etc.). Your poll will return with the dialog text on screen instead
of a final answer. Read it, decide, and reply with respond --async, which
re-arms the pending task so the next poll --wait picks up where it left off:
tui-driver claude respond --async "y" # approve the pending tool use
tui-driver claude respond --async "n" # deny
tui-driver claude respond --async "" # press Enter (accept the highlighted default)After responding, start a new poll --wait (in the background) to get the
next state or the final result.
Safety: you are approving tool use in a separate agent. Don't blindly
respond "y" to everything — inspect the dialog first. If you want the sub-task
to run without interactive approvals, agree the permission posture with the user
up front (e.g. launching with a permission flag), rather than auto-approving
whatever it asks.
Writing a Good Delegate Prompt
The sub-Claude has none of your context. The prompt must be fully self-contained.
- State the goal and the working directory's relevance — it starts fresh in
whatever
--diryou gave it. - Specify the exact deliverable and format — "Return a bullet list of the files that define routes and the HTTP method each handles" beats "look at the routing."
- Have it write results to a file you then read. This is the most reliable
way to get clean, verifiable output past the TUI chrome:
Thentui-driver claude send-async "Explore the auth module under ./src/auth and write a summary of the login flow (entry points, token handling, where sessions are stored) to /tmp/auth-summary.md. Keep it under 300 words."Read /tmp/auth-summary.mddirectly — don't rely on scraping the terminal. - Bound the scope — give it a clear stopping point so it doesn't wander.
Collecting and Trusting Results
- The captured response is everything after your prompt, including TUI chrome (boxes, status bars, the input line). Ignore those and extract the actual answer — or, better, read the file you asked it to write (tip #3).
- Treat the sub-Claude's output as a colleague's report, not ground truth. If you'll act on it (apply a patch, make a decision), spot-check the key claims against the actual files yourself.
Rules
- Same plan, not a separate bill — a sub-Claude shares this session's auth and usage pool; a concurrent one just burns shared rate limits faster, so don't spawn frivolously or in loops.
- Only for isolation / parallelism / second opinion — not routine work.
- Always
send-async+poll --wait(background) — never block. - One pending task per session; retrieve before sending again. A
timeout keeps the task pending — poll again or
cancel. - Monitor with
progress, retrieve withpoll/poll --wait— never monitor withraw. - Raise
TUI_TIMEOUTfor substantial tasks (default 300s is often short) and prefer an--untilcompletion marker. - Self-contained prompts — the sub-Claude has none of your context.
- Prefer file output (
write … to /tmp/…) and read it back to verify. - Inspect permission dialogs before
respond-ing; don't auto-approve. stopwhen done — never leave a sub-Claude running.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

