commit
Skill61 starsChanged 7 days agoMITView on GitHub
Create a single feature-level commit after a change is implemented. Reads the OpenSpec change artifacts to write a verb-phrase conventional-commit message with an outcome summary and optional issue reference. Commit only — never runs tests, typecheck, lint or build, and never pushes.
188 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- daledesilva/obsidian_inktheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- thoughtbot/rails-consultanttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- jisuzzzz/haechitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dirien/yet-another-agent-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- denysdovhan/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use validate-plan, act-on-feedback and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
shawn-dumasSkillvalidate-plan
Validate an orchestration plan after pre-flight certification. Runs adversarial review, deep review (verify prompt data against codebase), and PoC gate for risky approaches. Auto-invoked by orchestrate-* skills at Step 8.
Also in 5 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillact-on-feedback
Act on user feedback attached to the current session. Use when the user submits feedback on the session's changes via the Submit Feedback button.
Also in 3 projects that use this
decocmsSkilladd-mcp-tools
Guide for adding new MCP tools with consistent patterns for schemas, tool definitions, registry updates, and Better Auth integration
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillgenerate-run-commands
Generate or modify run commands for the current session. Use when the user wants to set up or update run commands that appear in the session's Run button.
Also in 3 projects that use this
mitsuhikoSkilloebb-scotty
Austrian rail travel planner (ÖBB Scotty). Use when planning train journeys in Austria, checking departures/arrivals at stations, or looking for service disruptions. Covers ÖBB trains, S-Bahn, regional trains, and connections to neighboring countries.
Also in 3 projects that use this
mitsuhikoSkillpi-share
Load and parse session transcripts from shittycodingagent.ai/buildwithpi.ai/buildwithpi.com/pi.dev (pi-share) URLs. Fetches gists, decodes embedded session data, and extracts conversation history.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions188 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 188
- microsoft/vscode★ 195ksame name
- TryGhost/Ghost★ 56ksame name
- ToolJet/ToolJet★ 41ksame name
- ShareX/ShareX★ 41ksame name
- openai/symphony★ 27ksame name
- ccusage/ccusage★ 19ksame name
- ryoppippi/ccusage★ 19ksame name
- windmill-labs/windmill★ 18ksame name
- EverMind-AI/EverMemOS★ 14ksame name
- EverMind-AI/EverOS★ 14ksame name
178 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository16 other files it gives its agents.
- .claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- bootstrapSkill
- dispatchSkill
- docs-digestSkill
- evalsSkill
- explain-codeSkill
- exploreSkill
- fix-testsSkill
- graphSkill
- manual-test-planSkill
- reportSkill
- review-artifactsSkill
- review-codeSkill
- settleSkill
- shipSkill
- specSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 168 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
Write one good commit for a completed change.
- Very specific: line 29
Ask only when the session is interactive and all three fail.
- Distinctive: line 34
If the branch looks like a feature branch but no reference was found:
- Very specific: line 49
Read proposal.md for the one-line intent, design.md for scope, and the checked items in tasks.md for what was actually done.
- Very specific: line 93
Never re-implement or quick-fix failing code here: If the tree looks broken: interactive, warn and ask whether to commit anyway.
- Very specific: line 99
Commit hash and subject, files committed, anything left unstaged, and the warning from step 1 if it fired.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 168 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Write one good commit for a completed change.
Commit only. This skill never runs tests, typecheck, lint, or a build — not in any mode, --yes included. Something else already verified; if nothing did, that is a gap in the caller, not work for this skill to absorb.
--yes runs non-interactively: no confirmation prompt. It is not permission to push or amend.
1. Resolve the change and the issue reference
Resolve the change by trying, in order:
- An explicit change name argument
- The current branch name (
feat/<name>,fix/<name>) - The most recently modified
openspec/changes/*/directory
Ask only when the session is interactive and all three fail. Under --yes, never ask — report which rungs were tried and stop with a one-line message.
Extract an issue reference from the branch when one was not passed:
feat/RD-65-task-page → RD-65 · fix/PROJ-123-login-bug → PROJ-123
If the branch looks like a feature branch but no reference was found:
⚠️ No issue reference found. Branch
<name>looks like a feature branch — pass one as/interlock:commit <REF>to avoid rewriting the message later.
Interactive: wait for the user to confirm or supply one. Under --yes: emit that single line, proceed without a ref, and surface it again in the final report. On main, develop, or any branch without a feat//fix/ prefix, proceed silently — the reference is genuinely optional there.
2. Gather context
openspec status --change "<name>" --json
git status --short
git diff --statRead proposal.md for the one-line intent, design.md for scope, and the checked items in tasks.md for what was actually done. Inspect the diff to confirm the message matches reality rather than matching the plan.
3. Compose the message
<type>(<scope>): <verb phrase, imperative, lowercase>
Summary of changes:
- <outcome, not task completion>
- <outcome>
Refs: <ISSUE-REF>- Scope is the issue reference when one exists (
feat(RD-65): …), otherwise the primary module or feature area (feat(tasks): …). - Summary bullets describe outcomes, not "completed task 2.3".
Refs:line appears only when a reference exists. Omit the line entirely otherwise — never writeRefs: none.
| Good | feat(RD-65): add task list page with filtering and status badges |
| Good | fix(PROJ-123): resolve token refresh race condition |
| Good | feat(tasks): add task list page with filtering |
| Bad | feat(tasks): Task List Page — not a verb phrase |
| Bad | feat(tasks): added the new task list page — past tense, wordy |
4. Preview and commit
Show the full message. Interactive: ask "Commit with this message?" and allow edits. Under --yes: print it and commit.
Stage by naming every path explicitly, then commit.
Guardrails
- Never
git add -Aorgit add .. Name every path. Leave unrelated dirty files unstaged. - Never push.
--yesis not that permission. - Never amend unless the user explicitly asks and the amend conditions hold.
--yesis not that permission. - Never run tests, typecheck, lint, or build — in any mode.
- Never re-implement or quick-fix failing code here. If the tree looks broken: interactive, warn and ask whether to commit anyway; under
--yes, commit and report the observation. Never start a verify/fix loop either way.
5. Report
Commit hash and subject, files committed, anything left unstaged, and the warning from step 1 if it fired. Suggest the next step: /interlock:settle to open or update the pull request.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
Reviews can't be read right now.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

