kotlin-testing
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Kotlin testing patterns with Kotest, MockK, coroutine testing, property-based testing, and Kover coverage. Follows TDD methodology with idiomatic Kotlin practices.
13 other projects use a version of this, 11 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Rojios/everything-claude-codeedited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- davidanthonyn/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- full-stack-skills/kotlin-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- gongyijie85/dsh-eccedited, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- MohamedEssam0-0/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- agenticluke/kotlin-test-pilot-plustheir own version, first seen Sep 23, 2026
Other versions13 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 11
- loulanyue/awesome-claude-notes★ 272100% same
- Fmarzochi/EGC★ 6199% same
- gongyijie85/dsh-ecc★ 899% same
- ronmkr/PromptBook★ 2100% same
- junimnjw/everything-claude-code★ 1100% same
- Rojios/everything-claude-code★ 1100% same
- SamuelNDCE/claude-super-skill-library★ 1100% same
- TironFox/everything-claude-code★ 1100% same
- davidanthonyn/claude-skills★ 0100% same
- MohamedEssam0-0/claude-skills★ 0100% same
1 more not listed
Wrote their own version · 2
- agenticluke/kotlin-test-pilot-plus★ 0same name
- full-stack-skills/kotlin-skills★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository270 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibilitySkill
- agent-architecture-auditSkill
- agent-evalSkill
- agent-harness-constructionSkill
- agentic-engineeringSkill
- agentic-osSkill
- agent-introspection-debuggingSkill
- agent-payment-x402Skill
- agent-self-evaluationSkill
- agent-sortSkill
- ai-first-engineeringSkill
- ai-regression-testingSkill
- android-clean-architectureSkill
- angular-developerSkill
- api-connector-builderSkill
- api-designSkill
- architecture-decision-recordsSkill
- article-writingSkill
- automation-audit-opsSkill
- autonomous-agent-harnessSkill
- autonomous-loopsSkill
- backend-patternsSkill
- benchmark-methodologySkill
- benchmark-optimization-loopSkill
- benchmarkSkill
- blender-motion-state-inspectionSkill
- blueprintSkill
- brand-discoverySkill
- brand-voiceSkill
- browser-qaSkill
- bun-runtimeSkill
- canary-watchSkill
- carrier-relationship-managementSkill
- cisco-ios-patternsSkill
- ckSkill
- claude-devfleetSkill
- clickhouse-ioSkill
- click-path-auditSkill
- codebase-onboardingSkill
- codehealth-mcpSkill
- code-tourSkill
- coding-standardsSkill
- competitive-platform-analysisSkill
- competitive-report-structureSkill
- compose-multiplatform-patternsSkill
- config-gcSkill
- configure-eccSkill
- connections-optimizerSkill
- content-engineSkill
- content-hash-cache-patternSkill
- context-budgetSkill
- continuous-agent-loopSkill
- continuous-learningSkill
- continuous-learning-v2Skill
- cost-aware-llm-pipelineSkill
- cost-trackingSkill
- councilSkill
- cpp-coding-standardsSkill
- cpp-testingSkill
- crosspostSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
9 rules. 5 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 4 are very specific to this project.
5
Common
Most of the 13 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
4
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 783
Write tests FIRST (TDD)
- Common: line 784
Use Kotest's spec styles consistently across the project
- Very specific: line 785
Use MockK's coEvery/coVerify for suspend functions
- Very specific: line 786
Use runTest for coroutine testing
- Common: line 787
Test behavior, not implementation
- Common: line 788
Use property-based testing for pure functions
- Very specific: line 789
Use data class test fixtures for clarity
- Very specific: line 794
Use Thread.sleep() in coroutine tests (use advanceTimeBy)
- Common: line 796
Test private functions directly
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 13 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Kotlin Testing Patterns
Comprehensive Kotlin testing patterns for writing reliable, maintainable tests following TDD methodology with Kotest and MockK.
When to Use
- Writing new Kotlin functions or classes
- Adding test coverage to existing Kotlin code
- Implementing property-based tests
- Following TDD workflow in Kotlin projects
- Configuring Kover for code coverage
How It Works
- Identify target code — Find the function, class, or module to test
- Write a Kotest spec — Choose a spec style (StringSpec, FunSpec, BehaviorSpec) matching the test scope
- Mock dependencies — Use MockK to isolate the unit under test
- Run tests (RED) — Verify the test fails with the expected error
- Implement code (GREEN) — Write minimal code to pass the test
- Refactor — Improve the implementation while keeping tests green
- Check coverage — Run
./gradlew koverHtmlReportand verify 80%+ coverage
Examples
The following sections contain detailed, runnable examples for each testing pattern:
Quick Reference
- Kotest specs — StringSpec, FunSpec, BehaviorSpec, DescribeSpec examples in Kotest Spec Styles
- Mocking — MockK setup, coroutine mocking, argument capture in MockK
- TDD walkthrough — Full RED/GREEN/REFACTOR cycle with EmailValidator in TDD Workflow for Kotlin
- Coverage — Kover configuration and commands in Kover Coverage
- Ktor testing — testApplication setup in Ktor testApplication Testing
TDD Workflow for Kotlin
The RED-GREEN-REFACTOR Cycle
RED -> Write a failing test first
GREEN -> Write minimal code to pass the test
REFACTOR -> Improve code while keeping tests green
REPEAT -> Continue with next requirementStep-by-Step TDD in Kotlin
// Step 1: Define the interface/signature
// EmailValidator.kt
package com.example.validator
fun validateEmail(email: String): Result<String> {
TODO("not implemented")
}
// Step 2: Write failing test (RED)
// EmailValidatorTest.kt
package com.example.validator
import io.kotest.core.spec.style.StringSpec
import io.kotest.matchers.result.shouldBeFailure
import io.kotest.matchers.result.shouldBeSuccess
class EmailValidatorTest : StringSpec({
"valid email returns success" {
validateEmail("user@example.com").shouldBeSuccess("user@example.com")
}
"empty email returns failure" {
validateEmail("").shouldBeFailure()
}
"email without @ returns failure" {
validateEmail("userexample.com").shouldBeFailure()
}
})
// Step 3: Run tests - verify FAIL
// $ ./gradlew test
// EmailValidatorTest > valid email returns success FAILED
// kotlin.NotImplementedError: An operation is not implemented
// Step 4: Implement minimal code (GREEN)
fun validateEmail(email: String): Result<String> {
if (email.isBlank()) return Result.failure(IllegalArgumentException("Email cannot be blank"))
if ('@' !in email) return Result.failure(IllegalArgumentException("Email must contain @"))
val regex = Regex("^[A-Za-z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+\\.[A-Za-z]{2,}$")
if (!regex.matches(email)) return Result.failure(IllegalArgumentException("Invalid email format"))
return Result.success(email)
}
// Step 5: Run tests - verify PASS
// $ ./gradlew test
// EmailValidatorTest > valid email returns success PASSED
// EmailValidatorTest > empty email returns failure PASSED
// EmailValidatorTest > email without @ returns failure PASSED
// Step 6: Refactor if needed, verify tests still passKotest Spec Styles
StringSpec (Simplest)
class CalculatorTest : StringSpec({
"add two positive numbers" {
Calculator.add(2, 3) shouldBe 5
}
"add negative numbers" {
Calculator.add(-1, -2) shouldBe -3
}
"add zero" {
Calculator.add(0, 5) shouldBe 5
}
})FunSpec (JUnit-like)
class UserServiceTest : FunSpec({
val repository = mockk<UserRepository>()
val service = UserService(repository)
test("getUser returns user when found") {
val expected = User(id = "1", name = "Alice")
coEvery { repository.findById("1") } returns expected
val result = service.getUser("1")
result shouldBe expected
}
test("getUser throws when not found") {
coEvery { repository.findById("999") } returns null
shouldThrow<UserNotFoundException> {
service.getUser("999")
}
}
})BehaviorSpec (BDD Style)
class OrderServiceTest : BehaviorSpec({
val repository = mockk<OrderRepository>()
val paymentService = mockk<PaymentService>()
val service = OrderService(repository, paymentService)
Given("a valid order request") {
val request = CreateOrderRequest(
userId = "user-1",
items = listOf(OrderItem("product-1", quantity = 2)),
)
When("the order is placed") {
coEvery { paymentService.charge(any()) } returns PaymentResult.Success
coEvery { repository.save(any()) } answers { firstArg() }
val result = service.placeOrder(request)
Then("it should return a confirmed order") {
result.status shouldBe OrderStatus.CONFIRMED
}
Then("it should charge payment") {
coVerify(exactly = 1) { paymentService.charge(any()) }
}
}
When("payment fails") {
coEvery { paymentService.charge(any()) } returns PaymentResult.Declined
Then("it should throw PaymentException") {
shouldThrow<PaymentException> {
service.placeOrder(request)
}
}
}
}
})DescribeSpec (RSpec Style)
class UserValidatorTest : DescribeSpec({
describe("validateUser") {
val validator = UserValidator()
context("with valid input") {
it("accepts a normal user") {
val user = CreateUserRequest("Alice", "alice@example.com")
validator.validate(user).shouldBeValid()
}
}
context("with invalid name") {
it("rejects blank name") {
val user = CreateUserRequest("", "alice@example.com")
validator.validate(user).shouldBeInvalid()
}
it("rejects name exceeding max length") {
val user = CreateUserRequest("A".repeat(256), "alice@example.com")
validator.validate(user).shouldBeInvalid()
}
}
}
})Kotest Matchers
Core Matchers
import io.kotest.matchers.shouldBe
import io.kotest.matchers.shouldNotBe
import io.kotest.matchers.string.*
import io.kotest.matchers.collections.*
import io.kotest.matchers.nulls.*
// Equality
result shouldBe expected
result shouldNotBe unexpected
// Strings
name shouldStartWith "Al"
name shouldEndWith "ice"
name shouldContain "lic"
name shouldMatch Regex("[A-Z][a-z]+")
name.shouldBeBlank()
// Collections
list shouldContain "item"
list shouldHaveSize 3
list.shouldBeSorted()
list.shouldContainAll("a", "b", "c")
list.shouldBeEmpty()
// Nulls
result.shouldNotBeNull()
result.shouldBeNull()
// Types
result.shouldBeInstanceOf<User>()
// Numbers
count shouldBeGreaterThan 0
price shouldBeInRange 1.0..100.0
// Exceptions
shouldThrow<IllegalArgumentException> {
validateAge(-1)
}.message shouldBe "Age must be positive"
shouldNotThrow<Exception> {
validateAge(25)
}Custom Matchers
fun beActiveUser() = object : Matcher<User> {
override fun test(value: User) = MatcherResult(
value.isActive && value.lastLogin != null,
{ "User ${value.id} should be active with a last login" },
{ "User ${value.id} should not be active" },
)
}
// Usage
user should beActiveUser()MockK
Basic Mocking
class UserServiceTest : FunSpec({
val repository = mockk<UserRepository>()
val logger = mockk<Logger>(relaxed = true) // Relaxed: returns defaults
val service = UserService(repository, logger)
beforeTest {
clearMocks(repository, logger)
}
test("findUser delegates to repository") {
val expected = User(id = "1", name = "Alice")
every { repository.findById("1") } returns expected
val result = service.findUser("1")
result shouldBe expected
verify(exactly = 1) { repository.findById("1") }
}
test("findUser returns null for unknown id") {
every { repository.findById(any()) } returns null
val result = service.findUser("unknown")
result.shouldBeNull()
}
})Coroutine Mocking
class AsyncUserServiceTest : FunSpec({
val repository = mockk<UserRepository>()
val service = UserService(repository)
test("getUser suspending function") {
coEvery { repository.findById("1") } returns User(id = "1", name = "Alice")
val result = service.getUser("1")
result.name shouldBe "Alice"
coVerify { repository.findById("1") }
}
test("getUser with delay") {
coEvery { repository.findById("1") } coAnswers {
delay(100) // Simulate async work
User(id = "1", name = "Alice")
}
val result = service.getUser("1")
result.name shouldBe "Alice"
}
})Argument Capture
test("save captures the user argument") {
val slot = slot<User>()
coEvery { repository.save(capture(slot)) } returns Unit
service.createUser(CreateUserRequest("Alice", "alice@example.com"))
slot.captured.name shouldBe "Alice"
slot.captured.email shouldBe "alice@example.com"
slot.captured.id.shouldNotBeNull()
}Spy and Partial Mocking
test("spy on real object") {
val realService = UserService(repository)
val spy = spyk(realService)
every { spy.generateId() } returns "fixed-id"
spy.createUser(request)
verify { spy.generateId() } // Overridden
// Other methods use real implementation
}Coroutine Testing
runTest for Suspend Functions
import kotlinx.coroutines.test.runTest
class CoroutineServiceTest : FunSpec({
test("concurrent fetches complete together") {
runTest {
val service = DataService(testScope = this)
val result = service.fetchAllData()
result.users.shouldNotBeEmpty()
result.products.shouldNotBeEmpty()
}
}
test("timeout after delay") {
runTest {
val service = SlowService()
shouldThrow<TimeoutCancellationException> {
withTimeout(100) {
service.slowOperation() // Takes > 100ms
}
}
}
}
})Testing Flows
import io.kotest.matchers.collections.shouldContainInOrder
import kotlinx.coroutines.flow.MutableSharedFlow
import kotlinx.coroutines.flow.toList
import kotlinx.coroutines.launch
import kotlinx.coroutines.test.advanceTimeBy
import kotlinx.coroutines.test.runTest
class FlowServiceTest : FunSpec({
test("observeUsers emits updates") {
runTest {
val service = UserFlowService()
val emissions = service.observeUsers()
.take(3)
.toList()
emissions shouldHaveSize 3
emissions.last().shouldNotBeEmpty()
}
}
test("searchUsers debounces input") {
runTest {
val service = SearchService()
val queries = MutableSharedFlow<String>()
val results = mutableListOf<List<User>>()
val job = launch {
service.searchUsers(queries).collect { results.add(it) }
}
queries.emit("a")
queries.emit("ab")
queries.emit("abc") // Only this should trigger search
advanceTimeBy(500)
results shouldHaveSize 1
job.cancel()
}
}
})TestDispatcher
import kotlinx.coroutines.test.StandardTestDispatcher
import kotlinx.coroutines.test.advanceUntilIdle
class DispatcherTest : FunSpec({
test("uses test dispatcher for controlled execution") {
val dispatcher = StandardTestDispatcher()
runTest(dispatcher) {
var completed = false
launch {
delay(1000)
completed = true
}
completed shouldBe false
advanceTimeBy(1000)
completed shouldBe true
}
}
})Property-Based Testing
Kotest Property Testing
import io.kotest.core.spec.style.FunSpec
import io.kotest.property.Arb
import io.kotest.property.arbitrary.*
import io.kotest.property.forAll
import io.kotest.property.checkAll
import kotlinx.serialization.json.Json
import kotlinx.serialization.encodeToString
import kotlinx.serialization.decodeFromString
// Note: The serialization roundtrip test below requires the User data class
// to be annotated with @Serializable (from kotlinx.serialization).
class PropertyTest : FunSpec({
test("string reverse is involutory") {
forAll<String> { s ->
s.reversed().reversed() == s
}
}
test("list sort is idempotent") {
forAll(Arb.list(Arb.int())) { list ->
list.sorted() == list.sorted().sorted()
}
}
test("serialization roundtrip preserves data") {
checkAll(Arb.bind(Arb.string(1..50), Arb.string(5..100)) { name, email ->
User(name = name, email = "$email@test.com")
}) { user ->
val json = Json.encodeToString(user)
val decoded = Json.decodeFromString<User>(json)
decoded shouldBe user
}
}
})Custom Generators
val userArb: Arb<User> = Arb.bind(
Arb.string(minSize = 1, maxSize = 50),
Arb.email(),
Arb.enum<Role>(),
) { name, email, role ->
User(
id = UserId(UUID.randomUUID().toString()),
name = name,
email = Email(email),
role = role,
)
}
val moneyArb: Arb<Money> = Arb.bind(
Arb.long(1L..1_000_000L),
Arb.enum<Currency>(),
) { amount, currency ->
Money(amount, currency)
}Data-Driven Testing
withData in Kotest
class ParserTest : FunSpec({
context("parsing valid dates") {
withData(
"2026-01-15" to LocalDate(2026, 1, 15),
"2026-12-31" to LocalDate(2026, 12, 31),
"2000-01-01" to LocalDate(2000, 1, 1),
) { (input, expected) ->
parseDate(input) shouldBe expected
}
}
context("rejecting invalid dates") {
withData(
nameFn = { "rejects '$it'" },
"not-a-date",
"2026-13-01",
"2026-00-15",
"",
) { input ->
shouldThrow<DateParseException> {
parseDate(input)
}
}
}
})Test Lifecycle and Fixtures
BeforeTest / AfterTest
class DatabaseTest : FunSpec({
lateinit var db: Database
beforeSpec {
db = Database.connect("jdbc:h2:mem:test;DB_CLOSE_DELAY=-1")
transaction(db) {
SchemaUtils.create(UsersTable)
}
}
afterSpec {
transaction(db) {
SchemaUtils.drop(UsersTable)
}
}
beforeTest {
transaction(db) {
UsersTable.deleteAll()
}
}
test("insert and retrieve user") {
transaction(db) {
UsersTable.insert {
it[name] = "Alice"
it[email] = "alice@example.com"
}
}
val users = transaction(db) {
UsersTable.selectAll().map { it[UsersTable.name] }
}
users shouldContain "Alice"
}
})Kotest Extensions
// Reusable test extension
class DatabaseExtension : BeforeSpecListener, AfterSpecListener {
lateinit var db: Database
override suspend fun beforeSpec(spec: Spec) {
db = Database.connect("jdbc:h2:mem:test;DB_CLOSE_DELAY=-1")
}
override suspend fun afterSpec(spec: Spec) {
// cleanup
}
}
class UserRepositoryTest : FunSpec({
val dbExt = DatabaseExtension()
register(dbExt)
test("save and find user") {
val repo = UserRepository(dbExt.db)
// ...
}
})Kover Coverage
Gradle Configuration
// build.gradle.kts
plugins {
id("org.jetbrains.kotlinx.kover") version "0.9.7"
}
kover {
reports {
total {
html { onCheck = true }
xml { onCheck = true }
}
filters {
excludes {
classes("*.generated.*", "*.config.*")
}
}
verify {
rule {
minBound(80) // Fail build below 80% coverage
}
}
}
}Coverage Commands
# Run tests with coverage
./gradlew koverHtmlReport
# Verify coverage thresholds
./gradlew koverVerify
# XML report for CI
./gradlew koverXmlReport
# View HTML report (use the command for your OS)
# macOS: open build/reports/kover/html/index.html
# Linux: xdg-open build/reports/kover/html/index.html
# Windows: start build/reports/kover/html/index.htmlCoverage Targets
| Code Type | Target |
| Critical business logic | 100% |
| Public APIs | 90%+ |
| General code | 80%+ |
| Generated / config code | Exclude |
Ktor testApplication Testing
class ApiRoutesTest : FunSpec({
test("GET /users returns list") {
testApplication {
application {
configureRouting()
configureSerialization()
}
val response = client.get("/users")
response.status shouldBe HttpStatusCode.OK
val users = response.body<List<UserResponse>>()
users.shouldNotBeEmpty()
}
}
test("POST /users creates user") {
testApplication {
application {
configureRouting()
configureSerialization()
}
val response = client.post("/users") {
contentType(ContentType.Application.Json)
setBody(CreateUserRequest("Alice", "alice@example.com"))
}
response.status shouldBe HttpStatusCode.Created
}
}
})Testing Commands
# Run all tests
./gradlew test
# Run specific test class
./gradlew test --tests "com.example.UserServiceTest"
# Run specific test
./gradlew test --tests "com.example.UserServiceTest.getUser returns user when found"
# Run with verbose output
./gradlew test --info
# Run with coverage
./gradlew koverHtmlReport
# Run detekt (static analysis)
./gradlew detekt
# Run ktlint (formatting check)
./gradlew ktlintCheck
# Continuous testing
./gradlew test --continuousBest Practices
DO:
- Write tests FIRST (TDD)
- Use Kotest's spec styles consistently across the project
- Use MockK's
coEvery/coVerifyfor suspend functions - Use
runTestfor coroutine testing - Test behavior, not implementation
- Use property-based testing for pure functions
- Use
data classtest fixtures for clarity
DON'T:
- Mix testing frameworks (pick Kotest and stick with it)
- Mock data classes (use real instances)
- Use
Thread.sleep()in coroutine tests (useadvanceTimeBy) - Skip the RED phase in TDD
- Test private functions directly
- Ignore flaky tests
Integration with CI/CD
# GitHub Actions example
test:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- uses: actions/setup-java@v4
with:
distribution: 'temurin'
java-version: '21'
- name: Run tests with coverage
run: ./gradlew test koverXmlReport
- name: Verify coverage
run: ./gradlew koverVerify
- name: Upload coverage
uses: codecov/codecov-action@v5
with:
files: build/reports/kover/report.xml
token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }}Remember: Tests are documentation. They show how your Kotlin code is meant to be used. Use Kotest's expressive matchers to make tests readable and MockK for clean mocking of dependencies.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

