gateguard
Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Fact-forcing gate that blocks Edit/Write/Bash (including MultiEdit) and demands concrete investigation (importers, data schemas, user instruction) before allowing the action. Measurably improves output quality by +2.25 points vs ungated agents.
- Deletes or force-pushes
- Installs packages
- Commits and pushes
9 other projects use a version of this, 7 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- lhbsaa/apex-unifiededited, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- pankaj-mahaur/Agent-Daemonedited, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- agenticluke/edit-gateguard-plustheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- davidanthonyn/claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- NISTALTALSON/essential-claude-skillsedited, first seen Oct 11, 2026
- 5throck/ai-workspace-standardstheir own version, first seen Sep 26, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use improve-codebase-architecture.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
GoogleSkillimprove-codebase-architecture
Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions9 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 7
- Fmarzochi/EGC★ 6197% same
- NISTALTALSON/essential-claude-skills★ 154% same
- SamuelNDCE/claude-super-skill-library★ 199% same
- YogirajA/Claude-Skills★ 152% same
- davidanthonyn/claude-skills★ 099% same
- lhbsaa/apex-unified★ 094% same
- pankaj-mahaur/Agent-Daemon★ 098% same
Wrote their own version · 2
- 5throck/ai-workspace-standards★ 25same name
- agenticluke/edit-gateguard-plus★ 0same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository270 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibilitySkill
- agent-architecture-auditSkill
- agent-evalSkill
- agent-harness-constructionSkill
- agentic-engineeringSkill
- agentic-osSkill
- agent-introspection-debuggingSkill
- agent-payment-x402Skill
- agent-self-evaluationSkill
- agent-sortSkill
- ai-first-engineeringSkill
- ai-regression-testingSkill
- android-clean-architectureSkill
- angular-developerSkill
- api-connector-builderSkill
- api-designSkill
- architecture-decision-recordsSkill
- article-writingSkill
- automation-audit-opsSkill
- autonomous-agent-harnessSkill
- autonomous-loopsSkill
- backend-patternsSkill
- benchmark-methodologySkill
- benchmark-optimization-loopSkill
- benchmarkSkill
- blender-motion-state-inspectionSkill
- blueprintSkill
- brand-discoverySkill
- brand-voiceSkill
- browser-qaSkill
- bun-runtimeSkill
- canary-watchSkill
- carrier-relationship-managementSkill
- cisco-ios-patternsSkill
- ckSkill
- claude-devfleetSkill
- clickhouse-ioSkill
- click-path-auditSkill
- codebase-onboardingSkill
- codehealth-mcpSkill
- code-tourSkill
- coding-standardsSkill
- competitive-platform-analysisSkill
- competitive-report-structureSkill
- compose-multiplatform-patternsSkill
- config-gcSkill
- configure-eccSkill
- connections-optimizerSkill
- content-engineSkill
- content-hash-cache-patternSkill
- context-budgetSkill
- continuous-agent-loopSkill
- continuous-learningSkill
- continuous-learning-v2Skill
- cost-aware-llm-pipelineSkill
- cost-trackingSkill
- councilSkill
- cpp-coding-standardsSkill
- cpp-testingSkill
- crosspostSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 1 is common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
1
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Common: line 33
No competitor does all three.
- Very specific: line 98
If GateGuard blocks setup or repair work, start the session with ECC_GATEGUARD=off.
- Very specific: line 128
Use .gateguard.yml to ignore paths like .venv/, node_modules/, .git/.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
GateGuard — Fact-Forcing Pre-Action Gate
A PreToolUse hook that forces Claude to investigate before editing. Instead of self-evaluation ("are you sure?"), it demands concrete facts. The act of investigation creates awareness that self-evaluation never did.
When to Activate
- Working on any codebase where file edits affect multiple modules
- Projects with data files that have specific schemas or date formats
- Teams where AI-generated code must match existing patterns
- Any workflow where Claude tends to guess instead of investigating
Core Concept
LLM self-evaluation doesn't work. Ask "did you violate any policies?" and the answer is always "no." This is verified experimentally.
But asking "list every file that imports this module" forces the LLM to run Grep and Read. The investigation itself creates context that changes the output.
Three-stage gate:
1. DENY — block the first Edit/Write/Bash attempt
2. FORCE — tell the model exactly which facts to gather
3. ALLOW — permit retry after facts are presentedNo competitor does all three. Most stop at deny.
Evidence
Two independent A/B tests, identical agents, same task:
| Task | Gated | Ungated | Gap |
| Analytics module | 8.0/10 | 6.5/10 | +1.5 |
| Webhook validator | 10.0/10 | 7.0/10 | +3.0 |
| Average | 9.0 | 6.75 | +2.25 |
Both agents produce code that runs and passes tests. The difference is design depth.
Gate Types
Edit / MultiEdit Gate (first edit per file)
MultiEdit is handled identically — each file in the batch is gated individually.
Before editing {file_path}, present these facts:
1. List ALL files that import/require this file (use Grep)
2. List the public functions/classes affected by this change
3. If this file reads/writes data files, show field names, structure,
and date format (use redacted or synthetic values, not raw production data)
4. Quote the user's current instruction verbatimWrite Gate (first new file creation)
Before creating {file_path}, present these facts:
1. Name the file(s) and line(s) that will call this new file
2. Confirm no existing file serves the same purpose (use Glob)
3. If this file reads/writes data files, show field names, structure,
and date format (use redacted or synthetic values, not raw production data)
4. Quote the user's current instruction verbatimDestructive Bash Gate (every destructive command)
Triggers on: rm -rf, git reset --hard, git push --force, drop table, etc.
1. List all files/data this command will modify or delete
2. Write a one-line rollback procedure
3. Quote the user's current instruction verbatimRoutine Bash Gate (once per session)
1. The current user request in one sentence
2. What this specific command verifies or producesQuick Start
Option A: Use the ECC hook (zero install)
The hook at scripts/hooks/gateguard-fact-force.js is included in this plugin. Enable it via hooks.json.
If GateGuard blocks setup or repair work, start the session with
ECC_GATEGUARD=off. For hook-level control, keep using
ECC_DISABLED_HOOKS with the GateGuard hook ID.
In long sessions, only the first GATEGUARD_FACT_FORCE_FULL_DENIALS
fact-force denials (default 3) emit the full four-fact block; later
denials are condensed to a single line carrying the denial ordinal, so
near-identical blocks cannot accumulate in the context window and
amplify model repetition loops (#2142). Retrying the same file or
command after presenting facts never re-triggers the gate.
Option B: Full package with config
pip install gateguard-ai
gateguard initThis adds .gateguard.yml for per-project configuration (custom messages, ignore paths, gate toggles).
Anti-Patterns
- Don't use self-evaluation instead. "Are you sure?" always gets "yes." This is experimentally verified.
- Don't skip the data schema check. Both A/B test agents assumed ISO-8601 dates when real data used
%Y/%m/%d %H:%M. Checking data structure (with redacted values) prevents this entire class of bugs. - Don't gate every single Bash command. Routine bash gates once per session. Destructive bash gates every time. This balance avoids slowdown while catching real risks.
Best Practices
- Let the gate fire naturally. Don't try to pre-answer the gate questions — the investigation itself is what improves quality.
- Customize gate messages for your domain. If your project has specific conventions, add them to the gate prompts.
- Use
.gateguard.ymlto ignore paths like.venv/,node_modules/,.git/.
Related Skills
safety-guard— Runtime safety checks (complementary, not overlapping)code-reviewer— Post-edit review (GateGuard is pre-edit investigation)
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

