start
Skill34 starsChanged 3 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Orient users on RELAI's capabilities, current eval status and next steps, or initialize RELAI records when a workflow needs them. Route clear requests directly to the relevant skill and reuse existing project infrastructure.
132 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- chuanglibs/Claude-Code-Game-Studios-Codextheir own version, first seen Nov 15, 2026
- ansvisor/ansvisortheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dsifry/metaswarmtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ai-search-guru/getcito-worlds-first-open-source-aio-aeo-or-geo-tooltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- paulocsb/worldcup-fifa-pooltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- srinator22/New-Projecttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use setup-engine, team-audio and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
CoralGameSkillsetup-engine
Configure the project's game engine and version. Pins the engine in CLAUDE.md, detects knowledge gaps, and populates engine reference docs via WebSearch when the version is beyond the LLM's training data.
Also in 13 projects that use this
CoralGameSkillteam-audio
Orchestrate audio team: audio-director + sound-designer + technical-artist + gameplay-programmer for full audio pipeline from direction to implementation.
Also in 13 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillcreate-stories
Break a single epic into implementable story files. Reads the epic, its GDD, governing ADRs, and control manifest. Each story embeds its GDD requirement TR-ID, ADR guidance, acceptance criteria, story type, and test evidence path. Run after /create-epics for each epic.
Also in 11 projects that use this
lilangMaxSkillstory-done
End-of-story completion review. Reads the story file, verifies each acceptance criterion against the implementation, checks for GDD/ADR deviations, prompts code review, updates story status to Complete, and surfaces the next ready story from the sprint.
Also in 11 projects that use this
- +5 more from CoralGame
- +3 more from lilangMax
Other versions132 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 132
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- Donchitos/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 27ksame name
- openai/plugins★ 7.8ksame name
- SterlingChin/marvin-template★ 1ksame name
- educlopez/ui-craft★ 441same name
- ai-search-guru/getcito-worlds-first-open-source-aio-aeo-or-geo-tool★ 432same name
- dsifry/metaswarm★ 426same name
- pixel-cellar/Claude-Code-Game-Studios★ 324same name
- ansvisor/ansvisor★ 233same name
- alexeykrol/claude-code-starter★ 194same name
122 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository8 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- coding-evalsSkill
- discoverSkill
- evalSkill
- improveSkill
- loopSkill
- trace-reviewSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 119 edited versions we read keep these.
2
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 39
When initialization is needed and authorized, copy only the parts of template/ needed for the selected workflow into the repository's …
- Distinctive: line 49
If setup was interrupted, restore missing template files needed for the selected work.
- Very specific: line 57
When using managed state, read its contract and update relai/STATUS.md using the board contract.
- Distinctive: line 61
Start the already requested skill.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 119 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Start here
RELAI helps teams understand and improve agent behavior. Choose the smallest useful workflow:
- discover: requirements, risks and open questions from code, docs or traces.
- trace-review: build or adapt a UI for traces and source-linked feedback, including findings, questions and eval review when needed.
- eval: build missing evaluations, reuse a benchmark, or measure current behavior.
- improve: a direct fix, regression check, or measured behavioral, cost or latency improvement.
- loop: coordinate ongoing learning and experiments under one agreement.
- coding-evals: agent-neutral coding tasks from sessions, pull requests and history, including for a custom coding agent developed here.
Route before setting up
Inspect the request and existing project tests, runners and results. A deterministic fix or a
regression check using project tests goes directly to improve; that handoff completes this skill
without requiring evaluation setup or a board. Maintain durable knowledge when useful as the
knowledge policy describes; a small task may yield
a valuable constraint or lesson. Do not ask the user to choose a step they already requested.
Other workflows reuse working infrastructure and initialize only the RELAI artifacts they need.
For shared terms, knowledge maintenance and user interaction, read the relevant sections of the
project's relai/README.md, otherwise the bundled terms,
knowledge policy and
user interaction guidance. Plugin methods are linked from each skill; relai/
paths refer to project artifacts, not files inside the plugin.
Initialize or recover managed state when needed
- A README beginning
<!-- relaiidentifies RELAI state. If an unrelated folder occupiesrelai/, explain the collision and ask how to resolve it. Do not move or overwrite it; another state root is not currently supported by these workflows. - When initialization is needed and authorized, copy only the parts of template/
needed for the selected workflow into the repository's
relai/, including supporting contracts and checker dependencies. Keep needed local references usable; references to optional stages do not require initializing those stages. Skip caches and renamegitignoreto.gitignorewhen copied. Explain material additions; ask only when existing instructions do not authorize them. Add other template assets when a concrete workflow needs them, rather than copying unused harness or reporting infrastructure in advance. - Record the source of copied files in
relai/UPSTREAM.mdor existing project provenance, following the project-copy upgrade policy. Apply that policy when upgrading existing copies; an installed plugin update does not replace project files. - If setup was interrupted, restore missing template files needed for the selected work. Preserve project modifications. If an existing file is incompatible with the needed operation, explain the difference and resolve that file rather than silently replacing the project copy.
- This is orientation and setup: do not run a model or container here. Name a credential only when a later step needs it, using the project's existing credential mechanism where suitable.
Orient and hand off
When using managed state, read its contract and update relai/STATUS.md using the
board contract. Show the current request, relevant progress, pending
decisions and the useful next action. Missing optional stages are not prerequisites.
Start the already requested skill. If the goal remains unclear, offer the relevant choices with a recommendation. This skill is complete when the request has been routed, or the user understands the project's relevant state and next action; setup and a board are required only on the managed-state path.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

