rhdh / rules
Cursor rule171 starsChanged 20 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
When creating or modifying Playwright spec files under e2e-tests/playwright/, always use the coverage-instrumented test and expect instead of importing directly from @playwright/test. The instrumented version is a drop-in replacement: describe, beforeAll, expect, locators, and all fixtures behave identically. When COLLECT_COVERAGE is unset (the default), the instrumented fixture is a no-op with zero overhead. If the spec creates its own BrowserContext / Page via browser.newContext(), also import and call the explicit helpers: See docs/coverage/e2e-rhdh.md for full details on the coverage infrastructure.
We split this e2e-coverage-imports.mdc into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 7
When creating or modifying Playwright spec files under e2e-tests/playwright/, always use the coverage-instrumented test and expect instead …
- Very specific: line 23
If the spec creates its own BrowserContext / Page via browser.newContext(), also import and call the explicit helpers:
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 6,350 Cursor rule files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
---
globs: e2e-tests/playwright/**/*.spec.ts,e2e-tests/playwright/**/*.test.ts
---
# E2E Coverage: Use Instrumented Imports
When creating or modifying Playwright spec files under `e2e-tests/playwright/`, always use the coverage-instrumented `test` and `expect` instead of importing directly from `@playwright/test`.
## Import Rule
```typescript
// WRONG - bypasses coverage collection
import { test, expect } from "@playwright/test";
// CORRECT - uses the @support path alias (configured in e2e-tests/tsconfig.json)
import { test, expect } from "@support/coverage/test";
```
The instrumented version is a drop-in replacement: `describe`, `beforeAll`, `expect`, locators, and all fixtures behave identically. When `COLLECT_COVERAGE` is unset (the default), the instrumented fixture is a no-op with zero overhead.
## Specs with Custom Context
If the spec creates its own `BrowserContext` / `Page` via `browser.newContext()`, also import and call the explicit helpers:
```typescript
import { test, expect, startCoverageForPage, stopCoverageForPage } from "@support/coverage/test";
test("my test", async ({ browser }, testInfo) => {
const context = await browser.newContext();
const page = await context.newPage();
await startCoverageForPage(page);
try {
// test body
} finally {
await stopCoverageForPage(page, testInfo);
await context.close();
}
});
```
## Reference
See `docs/coverage/e2e-rhdh.md` for full details on the coverage infrastructure.
Where files are headingNew Cursor rule files have more rules about planning and tracking tasks, and fewer about code style.
Of the Cursor rule files we read, the 3,978 first seen in the last six months, against the older ones: the kind of rule that gained most share, and the kind that lost most. About files like this in general, not this one, and an estimate, since a kind is a pattern in the words.
In this repository20 other files it gives its agents.
- .cursor/rules/add_extension_metadata.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/ci-e2e-testing.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/e2e-fix-workflow.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/github-workflows-security.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/managing-ai-rules.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/playwright-locators.mdcCursor rule
- e2e-deploy-rhdhSkill
- e2e-diagnose-and-fixSkill
- e2e-parse-ci-failureSkill
- e2e-reproduce-failureSkill
- e2e-submit-and-reviewSkill
- e2e-verify-fixSkill
- patch-backstageSkill
- e2e-deploy-rhdhSkill
- e2e-diagnose-and-fixSkill
- e2e-parse-ci-failureSkill
- e2e-reproduce-failureSkill
- e2e-submit-and-reviewSkill
- e2e-verify-fixSkill
- patch-backstageSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

