agentleFS
redf0x1redf0x1/camofox-browser/skills/dogfood/SKILL.md

dogfood

Skill438 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub

QA testing workflow for CamoFox Browser — systematic testing with console capture, error detection, and Playwright tracing. Use when the user needs to test a web application, perform QA validation, do exploratory testing, or verify web app behavior. Triggers include "test this website", "QA", "dogfood", "exploratory testing", "find bugs", or any request to systematically test a web application.

78 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use dep-refs, feature-boundary-planner and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • betacatslingSkill

    dep-refs

    Use when needs to inspect TypeScript export references in the z-code workspace, list exports from a file, verify whether an export is unused before deletion, investigate who imports a symbol during refactors, or combine pnpm knip unused-export results with pnpm dep:refs symbol-level reference tracing.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • betacatslingSkill

    feature-boundary-planner

    Map a ZCode behavior change to current UI surfaces, state owners, protocol commands, persistence, and validation. Use for impact analysis, product-boundary planning, or an implementation handoff grounded in the checked-out source.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • lir-navcooSkill

    yuanbao

    Yuanbao (元宝) groups: @mention users, query info/members.

    Also in 18 projects that use this

  • Cartograf666Skill

    architecture-governance

    Bootstrap, document, enforce, and review a project's architecture through layer responsibilities, dependency direction, architecture manifests, legacy baselines, Change Envelopes, cross-layer approval policy, and deterministic architecture checks. Use when starting a project, auditing an existing codebase, planning cross-layer work, preventing architecture erosion, reviewing structural changes, or deciding whether implementation may expand into another layer.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • john-data-chenSkill

    touchdesigner-mcp

    Control a running TouchDesigner instance via twozero MCP — create operators, set parameters, wire connections, execute Python, build real-time visuals. 36 native tools.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • math-incSkill

    minecraft-modpack-server

    Set up a modded Minecraft server from a CurseForge/Modrinth server pack zip. Covers NeoForge/Forge install, Java version, JVM tuning, firewall, LAN config, backups, and launch scripts.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

7 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 78 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 4

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Follow the primary user flows:

    line 47
  2. Distinctive:

    When a bug is found:

    line 103
  3. Distinctive:

    Use the issue taxonomy to classify findings.

    line 140
  4. Distinctive:

    Use the report template to document each issue.

    line 141
  5. Very specific:

    Use trace chunk-start/stop to isolate specific bug reproductions within a longer session

    line 154
  6. Very specific:

    Check errors frequently — many bugs show console errors before visual symptoms

    line 155
  7. Very specific:

    Use annotate for visual evidence — it numbers all interactive elements

    line 156

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 78 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Dogfood QA Testing — camofox-browser

Systematic exploratory testing of web applications using camofox-browser's anti-detection browser automation.

When to Use

  • Testing web applications for bugs, UX issues, and accessibility problems
  • QA validation before release
  • Exploratory testing of new features
  • Cross-browser verification with Firefox/Camoufox engine

Prerequisites

  • camofox-browser server running on port 9377
  • Target application URL accessible

Workflow

Phase 1: Initialize Session

# Create a dedicated test session
camofox open "about:blank" --user dogfood-qa

# Start trace recording for evidence capture
camofox trace start --user dogfood-qa --screenshots --snapshots

Phase 2: Navigate & Orient

# Navigate to target application
camofox navigate "https://target-app.com" --user dogfood-qa

# Take initial snapshot to understand page structure
camofox snapshot --user dogfood-qa

# Capture annotated screenshot for visual baseline
camofox annotate --user dogfood-qa

Phase 3: Systematic Exploration

3.1 Happy Path Testing

Follow the primary user flows:

# Interact with elements using refs from snapshot
camofox click e5 --user dogfood-qa
camofox type e3 "test input" --user dogfood-qa
camofox press Enter --user dogfood-qa

# Wait for navigation/loading
camofox wait networkidle --user dogfood-qa

# Capture state after each action
camofox snapshot --user dogfood-qa

3.2 Edge Case Testing

# Test empty inputs
camofox type e3 "" --user dogfood-qa
camofox press Enter --user dogfood-qa

# Test long strings
camofox type e3 "aaaa...very long string..." --user dogfood-qa
camofox press Enter --user dogfood-qa

# Test special characters
camofox type e3 "<script>alert('xss')</script>" --user dogfood-qa
camofox press Enter --user dogfood-qa

3.3 Error Discovery

# Check for console errors after interactions
camofox errors --user dogfood-qa

# Check console output for warnings
camofox console --user dogfood-qa --type warning

# Monitor all console messages
camofox console --user dogfood-qa --limit 50

3.4 State & Navigation Testing

# Test back/forward navigation
camofox go-back --user dogfood-qa
camofox go-forward --user dogfood-qa

# Save session state for later comparison
camofox session save dogfood-qa-state --user dogfood-qa

# Test page reload
camofox navigate "https://target-app.com" --user dogfood-qa

Phase 4: Document Issues

When a bug is found:

# 1. Capture visual evidence
camofox annotate --user dogfood-qa

# 2. Capture page errors
camofox errors --user dogfood-qa

# 3. Capture console logs
camofox console --user dogfood-qa

# 4. Mark trace chunk for this specific issue
camofox trace chunk-start --user dogfood-qa
# ... reproduce the bug ...
camofox trace chunk-stop --user dogfood-qa

# 5. Take snapshot for element state
camofox snapshot --user dogfood-qa

Phase 5: Wrap Up

# Stop trace recording
camofox trace stop --user dogfood-qa
# → Trace ZIP saved to ~/.camofox/traces/
# → View at https://trace.playwright.dev

# Final console/error summary
camofox errors --user dogfood-qa
camofox console --user dogfood-qa --type error

# Close session
camofox close --user dogfood-qa

Issue Reporting

Use the issue taxonomy to classify findings. Use the report template to document each issue.

Key Differences from Standard Browser Testing

FeatureStandardcamofox-browser
DetectionEasily flagged as botAnti-detection (C++ spoofing)
BrowserChrome/ChromiumFirefox/Camoufox
EvidenceScreenshots onlyTraces (screenshots + DOM + network)
ConsoleManual DevToolsconsole / errors commands
Element refsCSS selectorsAccessibility tree refs (eN)

Tips

  • Use trace chunk-start/stop to isolate specific bug reproductions within a longer session
  • Check errors frequently — many bugs show console errors before visual symptoms
  • Use annotate for visual evidence — it numbers all interactive elements
  • Trace ZIPs contain full reproduction data — share via trace.playwright.dev
  • The --user flag isolates test sessions from each other

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.