run-eval
Skill0 starsChanged 26 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Reproducible benchmark run into a new versioned result file — never over a committed baseline.
- Reads credentials
7 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- danielrosehill/AI-Evaltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- hidai25/eval-viewtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- DaveGold/mcp-metadata-demotheir own version, first seen Oct 26, 2026
- hishamkaram/markdown-memorytheir own version, first seen Oct 17, 2026
- sloprail/sloprailtheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- Kohulan/orthonym-skillstheir own version, first seen Sep 29, 2026
Other versions7 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 7
- microsoft/skills-for-copilot-studio★ 486same name
- hidai25/eval-view★ 140same name
- DaveGold/mcp-metadata-demo★ 5same name
- danielrosehill/AI-Eval★ 4same name
- Kohulan/orthonym-skills★ 2same name
- sloprail/sloprail★ 2same name
- hishamkaram/markdown-memory★ 1same name
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository4 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- kpi-reportSkill
- session-endSkill
- session-startSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 7 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
5
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 14
Output path: Always --out benchmarks/results/v2 (create it).
- Very specific: line 15
Run. For long runs use run_in_background and wait for the completion notification.
- Very specific: line 16
Write a sidecar <same-name>.run.json with everything from step 2, start/end time and the exit code.
- Very specific: line 18
Run the eval-analyst agent on the new JSON.
- Very specific: line 19
Do not edit any frozen file or docs/EVAL_RESULTS.md here.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 7 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Testbed and arguments: $ARGUMENTS
Testbeds: injecagent, memory_poisoning (via python -m benchmarks.cli), memory_poisoning_harm (python -m benchmarks.testbeds.memory_poisoning.harm_report), load (python -m benchmarks.load), soak (python -m benchmarks.soak), agentdojo (python -m benchmarks.testbeds.agentdojo.runner), classifier_eval, affordance_detector. Read benchmarks/README.md for each one's flags.
- Cost check. AgentDojo, the LLM classifier and anything with
SCANNER_BACKEND=llmcall a paid API. Estimate calls × tokens × price, show it, and wait for approval. Never read.envto find a key; ask the owner how the key is provided. - Pin the run. Record: HEAD commit and whether the tree is dirty (
git status --short), Python and package versions (pip freeze | sha256sum), everyTRUST_MEDIATOR_*/SCANNER_*env var in effect, seeds, model name, and the exact command line. - Output path. Always
--out benchmarks/results/v2(create it). Rename the outputs to<testbed>_<YYYY-MM-DD>[_<variant>].{md,json}. If that name exists, add_2,_3. Never pass--out benchmarks/results— the frozen guard blocks it. - Run. For long runs use
run_in_backgroundand wait for the completion notification. - Write a sidecar
<same-name>.run.jsonwith everything from step 2, start/end time and the exit code. - Compare against the committed baseline for the same testbed in
benchmarks/results/and report the delta. Always include theno_tool_policyablation row where the testbed has one, and both storage and harm ASR for memory poisoning. - Run the
eval-analystagent on the new JSON. Report anything it cannot reproduce. - Do not edit any frozen file or
docs/EVAL_RESULTS.mdhere;/kpi-reportdoes that.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

