agentleFS
randommoniclerandommonicle/claude-skills/flag-deferred-items/SKILL.md

flag-deferred-items

Skill27 starsChanged 18 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub

When proposing anything as deferred, out of scope, or "for a later phase", plant a grep-able flag at the place where the deferred work will land. Triggers whenever the words "deferred", "out of scope", "later commit", "later phase", "future work", or similar appear in plans, commits, or design discussions.

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈3

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When proposing anything as deferred, do not record it only in a session-specific document and move on.

    line 8
  2. Distinctive:

    Migration-level anchor: If a future schema change is anticipated, add a comment in the most recent migration affecting the relevant table …

    line 33
  3. Distinctive:

    Handover-note entry: If a handover note is being produced, list deferred items in a dedicated section so the next session sees them on read.

    line 37
  4. Very specific:

    If the project uses multiple tokens for different deferral types (e.g.

    line 45
  5. Very specific:

    FORWARD anchors are the milestone checklist: Before scoping a milestone, grep -rn "FORWARD(<milestone>)" and treat every hit as a checklist …

    line 61

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Flag deferred items at the anchor

When proposing anything as deferred, do not record it only in a session-specific document and move on. Plant a grep-able flag at the place where the deferred work will actually land.

When this applies

This skill fires whenever a plan, commit, or design discussion contains language like:

  • "deferred"
  • "out of scope"
  • "later commit" / "later phase"
  • "future work"
  • "future enhancement"
  • "Phase N+" / "post-launch" / "post-MVP"
  • "not in this PR"
  • "follow-up"

Any of those phrases is the trigger. The skill applies regardless of whether the deferral is forced by scope, time, dependency, or design choice.

How to apply

For each deferred item, plant flags at as many of these locations as apply:

  1. Code-level anchor. Add a comment at the file, function, or migration the deferred work will touch when it lands. Use a grep-able prefix the project agrees on (commonly FORWARD:, TODO:, or a project-specific tag). The comment names the deferred item and points at where it was decided.

    Example: // FORWARD: spend-cap director-approval queue, see DECISIONS 2026-05-10

  2. Migration-level anchor. If a future schema change is anticipated, add a comment in the most recent migration affecting the relevant table family, pointing forward to the expected change.
  3. Decision-log entry. Record the deferral in the project's decisions log with a "When this lands, also do X" line so re-reading the entry surfaces secondary work.
  4. Handover-note entry. If a handover note is being produced, list deferred items in a dedicated section so the next session sees them on read.

The same item often deserves anchors at multiple locations. A migration deferral typically needs both a comment in the current migration (so the next migration on that table sees it) and a decision-log entry (so re-reading the decision surfaces it).

What "grep-able" means

The anchor must use a literal token consistent enough that grep -rn "<token>" across the codebase returns every deferred item. Inconsistent tokens (TODO in one place, FIXME in another, plain prose in a third) defeat the purpose.

If the project uses multiple tokens for different deferral types (e.g. FORWARD: for next-phase, PROD-GATE: for production-blocking), use the right token for the right item. The project-level memory or CLAUDE.md will define the taxonomy.

What this skill does not do

This skill does not decide whether to defer. The decision to defer is part of the plan-first gate. This skill only fires once the decision has been made, to ensure the deferral is anchored.

This skill does not promise the deferred work will be done. The anchor's job is to surface the item when the relevant area is next touched, so the decision to do or re-defer can be made then.

Why

Out-of-scope items recorded only in a session-specific document decay. By the time the relevant phase or area is touched again, the document may not be the most recently read, and the deferred item gets forgotten or rediscovered the hard way (rework, missed regulatory requirement, or worse). Anchoring at the future landing point means the reminder is visible from multiple angles when the work happens.

Additions from cross-repo lessons (ratified 2026-07-23)

  • Expected-breakage tests carry the anchor in .fixme(), never .skip() or deletion — a fixme stays visible in every run's output; a skip disappears into green.
  • FORWARD anchors are the milestone checklist. Before scoping a milestone, grep -rn "FORWARD(<milestone>)" and treat every hit as a checklist item; the predecessor migration's header records the contract a handover summarised away.
  • Dormant controls say so everywhere. A gate that bites nothing yet states its dormancy in the migration, the smoke, the decision log, and to the user — otherwise its first bite is diagnosed as a new bug.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.