frontend-component-build
Skill2 starsChanged 26 days agoMITView on GitHub
Build production-ready frontend components with accessible markup, sensible props, defined states, and tested behavior. Use this skill whenever the user wants to build a component from scratch, refactor an existing one, design a component API, or implement a UI element with proper states and accessibility. Triggers on build a component, create a button, create a modal, create a form input, component API, props design, component states, refactor component, accessible component. Also triggers when implementing UI from a design that needs to be reusable.
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈4
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 83
Every state needs visual treatment AND accessibility treatment.
- Very specific: line 110
Button: use <button>. Don't fake one with a <div>.
- Distinctive: line 120
Verify the component works before declaring it done.
- Distinctive: line 141
Style with tokens: No hardcoded colors, spacing, or sizes.
- Distinctive: line 173
When to use vs. when to use an alternative
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 308,232 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Frontend Component Build
Build production-ready components. Stack-agnostic principles. Most patterns translate to React, Vue, Svelte, or vanilla web components.
This skill is about implementing a component well. For broader system design see design-system. For day-to-day visual decisions see design-standards.
When to use
- Building a new component from scratch
- Refactoring an existing component
- Designing a component API (props, slots, events)
- Adding accessibility to an existing component
- Implementing a component from a design
When NOT to use
- Building a full design system (use
design-system) - Page-level design decisions (use
design-standards) - Backend or data work (use
code-review-web) - Performance-only optimization (use
performance-optimization)
Required inputs
- The component's purpose (what UI need it serves)
- The design (or willingness to design it)
- The framework or technical context
- The states the component must support
- Accessibility requirements
The framework: 6 dimensions
A complete component handles six dimensions. Skip any one and the component is incomplete.
1. Anatomy
Identify the parts that make up the component before writing any markup.
Common anatomies:
- Button: container + label + (optional) icon + (optional) loading indicator
- Modal: backdrop + container + header + body + footer + close affordance
- Form input: label + input + (optional) help text + (optional) error message
- Card: container + (optional) header + body + (optional) footer + (optional) media
Naming the parts up front makes the API obvious.
2. Variants
What variations does the component support?
- Visual variants (primary, secondary, ghost, danger)
- Size variants (small, medium, large)
- Functional variants (with icon, without icon, icon-only)
Variants should be a managed set, not a free-for-all. Document the supported set; reject requests for new variants without a real use case.
3. States
What states must the component handle?
- Default
- Hover (when pointer is supported)
- Focus (always - keyboard navigation requires it)
- Active / pressed
- Disabled
- Loading (where applicable)
- Error (for inputs, forms, validation-bound components)
- Empty (for components that display data)
Every state needs visual treatment AND accessibility treatment.
4. Props / API
Design the component's contract.
API design principles:
- Required props minimal. What's truly needed every time? That's required. Everything else has a sensible default.
- Boolean props are red flags. Three booleans means seven combinations. Prefer enum strings:
variant: "primary" | "secondary" | "ghost"overprimary={true} ghost={false}. - Children > props. Where content is content, accept children. Don't invent
headerTextandbodyTextprops when slots work. - Composition > configuration. A component that does 5 things via 12 props often should be 5 smaller components.
- Type the props. TypeScript or PropTypes or JSDoc. The type is documentation that won't go out of date.
5. Accessibility
Build it accessible from the start. Adding accessibility later is 5x harder.
Universal:
- Semantic HTML elements (
<button>,<a>,<nav>,<form>, etc.) over generic<div> - Keyboard navigable (Tab, Shift+Tab, Enter/Space for buttons)
- Focus visible
- Tap targets minimum 44 by 44 pixels
- ARIA only where semantic HTML is insufficient
Component-specific:
- Button: use
<button>. Don't fake one with a<div>. - Modal: focus trap, ESC to close, returns focus to trigger on close,
role="dialog"andaria-labelledby. - Form input: label associated via
for/idoraria-labelledby. Error messages linked viaaria-describedby.aria-invalidwhen in error state. - Toggles:
<button>witharia-pressedfor two-state, orrole="switch"for on/off. - Tabs:
role="tablist"/role="tab"/role="tabpanel"witharia-selectedand arrow-key navigation. - Tooltips and popovers: triggered by focus AND hover. Dismissible with ESC.
- Loading states: announce with
aria-liveso screen readers know something changed.
6. Tests
Verify the component works before declaring it done.
Test types by priority:
- Visual regression. Renders correctly across variants and states. (Storybook + visual diff tools, or manual screenshots.)
- Accessibility. Passes axe or equivalent automated checks.
- Keyboard navigation. Tab, Enter, Escape, arrow keys all work as expected.
- Component logic. Props produce expected output. Events fire correctly. (Unit tests.)
- Integration. Component works inside its expected parent contexts.
A component without at least automated accessibility testing is not done.
Workflow
- Understand the use case. What UI need does this component serve? Where will it appear? Adjacent components?
- Sketch the anatomy. Name the parts.
- List variants and states. Match the design system or define new ones if needed.
- Design the API. Required props, optional props, children, events. Type it.
- Build the markup with semantic HTML. Choose the right elements. Avoid generic
<div>for interactive things. - Style with tokens. No hardcoded colors, spacing, or sizes.
- Add interaction. Focus management, keyboard handlers, ARIA.
- Add states. Hover, focus, active, disabled, loading, error.
- Test. Automated accessibility, keyboard navigation, visual regression.
- Document. Usage, API, examples, anti-patterns.
Failure patterns
- Building with
<div onClick>. Loses keyboard accessibility, screen reader semantics, and focus. Use<button>or<a>. - Hardcoding colors and sizes. Tokens exist for a reason. Hardcoded values resist theming and consistency.
- Boolean prop explosion.
<Button primary large rounded fullWidth disabled icon />. Too many booleans means you actually need fewer variants designed more thoughtfully. - Forgetting focus states. Hover gets attention; focus gets neglected. Keyboard users see invisible buttons.
- Skipping disabled-state thought. A disabled button should look obviously disabled AND be
aria-disabledAND not respond to clicks. - Inventing ARIA. ARIA roles and properties have specific behaviors. Made-up ARIA is worse than no ARIA. Use semantic HTML first.
- Loading state that doesn't announce. Screen readers don't know the spinner appeared. Use
aria-live="polite"orrole="status". - Tooltip-only critical content. Hover-only content is invisible to keyboard and touch users. Critical content goes in the visible UI.
- Component without docs. Future-you, your teammate, or the next maintainer cannot use what they cannot understand.
Output format
A complete component delivery includes:
- Component code (in the appropriate framework)
- Storybook (or equivalent) entry showing all variants and states
- Documentation:
- Anatomy diagram or description
- Props/API table
- Usage examples (basic, advanced, edge cases)
- When to use vs. when to use an alternative
- Anti-patterns (what to avoid)
- Accessibility notes
- Tests (visual regression + accessibility + logic)
Reference files
references/component-spec-template.md- Template for documenting a component (props, states, accessibility, edge cases) before building.references/component-api-patterns.md- Common patterns for designing flexible component APIs (compound components, controlled vs uncontrolled, polymorphicasprop, render props, slots).references/accessibility-patterns.md- ARIA patterns for common interactive components.
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- accessibility-auditSkill
- code-review-webSkill
- content-and-copySkill
- content-strategySkill
- cro-optimizationSkill
- design-standardsSkill
- performance-optimizationSkill
- pm-spec-writingSkill
- qa-testingSkill
- seo-aeo-geoSkill
- seo-keywordSkill
- seo-onpageSkill
- skill-creation-walkthroughSkill
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

