agentleFS
rajedevrajedev/AIWeatherApp/.claude/skills/openweathermap-api-integration/SKILL.md

openweathermap-api-integration

Skill0 starsChanged 4 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Use this skill whenever integrating OpenWeatherMap's free-tier API into an app — current weather, 5-day/3-hour forecast, geocoding (city name to coordinates and back), or securely configuring the API key (local.properties, BuildConfig, request interceptor). Trigger on mentions of "OpenWeatherMap", "openweathermap.org", "forecast5", "data/2.5/weather", "data/2.5/forecast", "geo/1.0/direct", "geo/1.0/reverse", "OWM", or "OpenWeatherMap API key". Also trigger for the general technique of aggregating interval-based forecast data (e.g. 3-hourly) into daily buckets, which generalizes beyond weather to any interval-sampled forecast/timeseries API. Covers the free endpoints, which name/ID-based lookups are deprecated in favor of geocoding, the client-side daily-aggregation logic the free tier requires, and safe API key storage. Not a tech-stack tutorial — pair with whatever networking/DI/caching pattern the project already uses (e.g. an offline-first caching skill).

  • Reads credentials

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. About 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈1

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.