agentleFS
rainmancswh-dotrainmancswh-dot/claude-skills/spec-verify/SKILL.md

spec-verify

Skill1 starsChanged 5 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub

规格一致性验证 — 检查前端代码是否与 api-contract.yaml 和 flows.md 一致,输出结构化 PASS/FAIL 结果

11 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use spec-apply, spec-archive and 2 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • pivoshenkoSkill

    spec-apply

    Implement an OpenSpec change's tasks in parallel - read the task queue, plan file-disjoint waves, dispatch one agent per task into its own worktree, verify, tick the checkbox, commit, repeat. Use when the user says "apply the change", "implement the change", "run the tasks", "work the tasks in parallel", "fan out the change", "dispatch the spec", "/spec-apply", or hands over an OpenSpec change and expects code written for it. Wraps `/opsx:apply`, whose loop is strictly serial, single-agent, and git-blind. Boundaries: artifacts missing or incomplete -> `spec-propose`; every task already ticked and the result needs checking -> `spec-verify`; a finished change ready to fold into the specs -> `spec-archive`; a plain GitHub issue with no OpenSpec change behind it -> `git-issue-start`.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • sourjyaSkill

    spec-archive

    Archive a completed and verified spec. Moves it from active specs to the docs archive, updates the spec registry. Use after spec-verify passes.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    grill-me

    A relentless interview to sharpen a plan or design.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    handoff

    Compact the current conversation into a handoff document for another agent to pick up.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 11 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 11 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.