consult
Skill148 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub
Consult an external LLM with the user's query.
21 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- fjwood69/moritheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- natb1/commons.systemstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- natb1/CanonDBtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- alimohammadiamirhossein/deputytheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarmtheir own version, first seen Oct 30, 2026
- meowdiocre/meowpitheir own version, first seen Oct 27, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use discover, init and 3 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
anombyte93Skilldiscover
Phase 1 of the prd-taskmaster pipeline: brainstorm-driven discovery. Delegates to superpowers:brainstorming in Interactive Mode (one adaptive question at a time), or self-brainstorms in Autonomous Mode when no user is present. Intercepts before the brainstorming chain hands off to writing-plans — this skill owns the exit. Extracts constraints, calibrates scale (Solo / Team / Enterprise), and advances the pipeline to GENERATE.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillinit
Also in 3 projects that use this
AnthropicSkillstatus
Case status summary by audience — client-facing (plain language), internal (for the professor), or court-ready (formal caption format per local rules). Same facts, different framing and depth. Use when a student needs to update the client, brief the professor, or prepare a court status report.
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillcouncil
Convene the persona panel — six orthogonal review lenses — on a target. Cold independent fan-out, debate-to-consensus, synthesized verdict with recorded dissent and a roster manifest.
Also in 3 projects that use this
AWSSkillship
Finalize dev work on an issue branch — update docs, push, and open a PR.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions21 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 21
- zaxbysauce/opencode-swarm★ 519same name
- ZaxbyHub/opencode-swarm★ 518same name
- ansari-project/codev★ 298same name
- cluesmith/codev★ 298same name
- fjwood69/mori★ 32same name
- jamillazarev/multica-ops★ 11same name
- Reef123/OpenVera★ 9same name
- meowdiocre/meowpi★ 3same name
- alimohammadiamirhossein/deputy★ 2same name
- natb1/CanonDB★ 2same name
11 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- collabSkill
- collab-vsSkill
- consult-llmSkill
- debateSkill
- debate-vsSkill
- implementSkill
- panelSkill
- phased-implementSkill
- review-panelSkill
- reviewSkill
- workshopSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
6 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 17 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 23
Check $ARGUMENTS for flags:
- Distinctive: line 43
Use Glob/Grep to find relevant files.
- Distinctive: line 44
Read key files to confirm relevance.
- Distinctive: line 46
Do not stop at the first plausible file, definition, setting, or example.
- Very specific: line 59
Before using the response, apply the loaded consult-llm skill's context request loop.
- Distinctive: line 69
ALWAYS gather file context before consulting.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 17 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Consult an external LLM with the user's query via the consult-llm CLI.
Load the consult-llm skill before invoking — it defines the invocation contract (stdin heredoc, flags, output format, multi-turn). Do not call the CLI without loading it first.
Available models
Selectors resolvable in this environment (depends on configured API keys):
!`consult-llm models`Argument handling
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
Check $ARGUMENTS for flags:
Model flags: any --<selector> from the Models block above selects that model (e.g. --gemini, --openai, --deepseek, --minimax). Repeat for multiple models — they run in parallel.
Translate model flags according to the loaded consult-llm skill's model-selection rules.
Mode flags:
--browser→ use web mode (--web, copies prompt to clipboard)--background→ run the Bash call in background mode (run_in_background)
Strip all flags from the arguments to get the user query.
Workflow
0. Load consult-llm skill
Load it now. Follow its invocation contract for all CLI calls in this workflow.
1. Gather context
- Use Glob/Grep to find relevant files.
- Read key files to confirm relevance.
- Do enough research to understand how the requested behavior actually works. Before starting, think about what resources would be useful to obtain first: relevant source files, tests, logs, generated files, config, examples, command output, external docs, or authoritative upstream source. Gather the cheapest useful evidence before consulting.
- Do not stop at the first plausible file, definition, setting, or example. Follow references, callers, related tests, and runtime usage until you can explain the current behavior and the likely impact of changing it.
- Select files that let reviewers understand the behavior being discussed and verify your assumptions.
2. Invoke
One or more --<selector> flags — single call with one -m <selector> per flag, plus -f <path> for each relevant file. Multiple selectors run in parallel and the CLI returns a combined response with per-model sections.
No model flag (default) — use the loaded consult-llm skill's default model-selection rules, plus -f <path> for each relevant file.
--browser — single call with --web (model flags are ignored in web mode).
3. Resolve context requests
Before using the response, apply the loaded consult-llm skill's context request loop. If an answer ends with a context request, resume that model independently with the requested evidence and treat its revised answer as the consultation result.
4. Present results
- Normal mode (single model): summarize key insights, recommendations, and considerations.
- Normal mode (multiple models): the CLI output already contains labeled per-model sections. Synthesize by highlighting agreements, noting disagreements, and presenting a unified takeaway.
- Web mode: inform the user the prompt was copied to clipboard and ask them to paste it into their browser-based LLM and share the response back.
Critical rules
- ALWAYS gather file context before consulting.
- Pass through the user's query faithfully — do NOT add your own theories, suspects, analysis, or suggested solutions to the prompt. The user's intent is the prompt. Rephrase as needed so the prompt reads as a direct question to the LLM, not a meta-instruction to you. You may add brief factual context (e.g. "we recently changed X to Y"), but never inject your own diagnostic opinions or hypotheses. Do not pass the user's query verbatim if it is phrased as an instruction to you rather than a question for the LLM.
- Provide focused, relevant files (quality over quantity).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

