agentleFS
rahmanef63rahmanef63/si-coder-agent/skills/sc-build/SKILL.md

sc-build

Skill13 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Build a web app from a plain-language idea for a non-technical user. Ask at most three short business/product questions one at a time, infer everything already stated, choose technical defaults automatically, create a first working version, gather product feedback, then publish through /sc-all.

2 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

21 rules. About 0 are common, 18 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈18

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 3

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Use this for a new app, a vague business idea, or requests such as:

    line 14
  2. Distinctive:

    Do not ask again for anything already stated or safely inferable.

    line 36
  3. Very specific:

    When product information is genuinely missing, use the sc.product.interview tool when available.

    line 38
  4. Distinctive:

    Ask one question at a time.

    line 42
  5. Distinctive:

    Ask at most three questions before the first build.

    line 43
  6. Distinctive:

    Prefer 2–4 plain-language choices when they make answering easier.

    line 45
  7. Distinctive:

    Do not ask about framework, database, hosting provider, repository provider, DNS, containers, CI, or environment variables by default.

    line 47
  8. Distinctive:

    If the user says "use your best judgment", stop interviewing and build.

    line 48
  9. Distinctive:

    After three questions, use sensible assumptions and build a focused first version.

    line 49
  10. Distinctive:

    Create a concise internal brief without asking the user to approve technical details:

    line 53
  11. Distinctive:

    Create the first working version as soon as the brief is sufficient.

    line 68
  12. Distinctive:

    no placeholder files that exist only to preserve obsolete imports,

    line 78
  13. Distinctive:

    Do not make the user review an implementation plan before building unless there is a real cost, destructive change, legal/compliance …

    line 81
  14. Distinctive:

    When a preview is possible, summarize what now works in user terms.

    line 85
  15. Distinctive:

    If the user is satisfied or asked to publish immediately, continue without another confirmation loop.

    line 95
  16. Very specific:

    Follow /sc-all for the runtime-first deployment, connected-account, domain, and verification flow.

    line 99
  17. Distinctive:

    Never ask the user to copy secret values between services when a connector/server-side path can do it.

    line 103
  18. Very specific:

    Use the main sc delivery workflow (../sc/references/delivery.md, or references/delivery.md in its standalone package) through sc-all.

    line 108
  19. Distinctive:

    When one service permission blocks progress, present only that action:

    line 114
  20. Distinctive:

    Keep environment key names, terminal commands, and provider internals in optional technical details unless the user must run a command …

    line 121
  21. Distinctive:

    Do not present a generic backlog or upsell list.

    line 135

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

/sc-build — idea to working web app

Use this for a new app, a vague business idea, or requests such as:

/sc-build I need a website for my laundry business.

The user is not expected to provide a PRD, choose a framework, understand hosting, or know database terminology.

Language

Reply in the user's language. Keep internal instructions and durable documentation in English.

Phase 1 — understand the product, not the infrastructure

First extract as much as possible from the user's existing message:

  • the outcome they want,
  • who will use it,
  • the most important user action,
  • any must-have requirement,
  • business/product name if given,
  • desired domain if given,
  • whether there is already an existing project.

Do not ask again for anything already stated or safely inferable.

When product information is genuinely missing, use the sc.product.interview tool when available. Otherwise follow the same policy manually.

Interview rules

  1. Ask one question at a time.
  2. Ask at most three questions before the first build.
  3. Questions are business/product questions, never technology questions.
  4. Prefer 2–4 plain-language choices when they make answering easier.
  5. A domain is not required for the first preview.
  6. Do not ask about framework, database, hosting provider, repository provider, DNS, containers, CI, or environment variables by default.
  7. If the user says "use your best judgment", stop interviewing and build.
  8. After three questions, use sensible assumptions and build a focused first version.

Phase 2 — create the internal build brief

Create a concise internal brief without asking the user to approve technical details:

  • product goal,
  • users/roles,
  • primary flow,
  • first-version must-have,
  • pages/screens implied by the flow,
  • data the app needs,
  • external services only when the feature requires them,
  • launch/domain preference if already known.

Choose the simplest maintainable architecture supported by the current environment and existing project standards. If an existing project is present, preserve its architecture unless the user requested a migration.

Phase 3 — build first, explain second

Create the first working version as soon as the brief is sufficient.

Default quality bar:

  • responsive/mobile-first,
  • accessible basic interactions,
  • useful empty/loading/error states,
  • real data flow for the core feature rather than decorative mock UI,
  • authentication only when the product actually needs separate identities/roles,
  • sensible validation and safe defaults,
  • no placeholder files that exist only to preserve obsolete imports,
  • DRY/SSOT implementation appropriate to the chosen stack.

Do not make the user review an implementation plan before building unless there is a real cost, destructive change, legal/compliance concern, or another decision that cannot be safely inferred.

Phase 4 — preview and product feedback

When a preview is possible, summarize what now works in user terms. Ask for product feedback, not technical approval.

Good:

"The first version is ready: customers can choose a service and request a booking, and the admin can see incoming requests. What would you like to change in the experience?"

Avoid:

"Do you approve Svelte + Convex + Vercel?"

If the user is satisfied or asked to publish immediately, continue without another confirmation loop.

Phase 5 — publish seamlessly

Follow /sc-all for the runtime-first deployment, connected-account, domain, and verification flow.

  • Hosted chat/web agent → use secure connected accounts; do not require a VPS or local secret store.
  • Local runtime → infer existing server configuration; if genuinely unknown, ask in plain language whether the user wants to use their own server or the easiest managed option.
  • Never ask the user to copy secret values between services when a connector/server-side path can do it.

A publish is complete only after the public app, domain/HTTPS and requested account/email flows are verified. Include required recovery, OAuth consent/legal pages and release automation in the initial acceptance criteria. Use the main sc delivery workflow (../sc/references/delivery.md, or references/delivery.md in its standalone package) through sc-all. Preserve existing auth/hosting choices and record configured/deployed/verified separately.

Permission/access handoff

When one service permission blocks progress, present only that action:

  • what access is needed in user language,
  • the official URL or secure connector link,
  • where SI-Coder stores the access safely,
  • what SI-Coder will do immediately after the user completes it.

Keep environment key names, terminal commands, and provider internals in optional technical details unless the user must run a command locally.

Completion and next step

State what is working now, including the canonical public URL when published. Then provide exactly one:

[rekomendasi]
Next        : <one highest-value next improvement>
Why         : <one sentence>
Needs       : <prerequisites, or "nothing from you yet">
If you want : <what SI-Coder will do next>

Do not present a generic backlog or upsell list.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.