agentleFS
raaafraaaf/claude-skills/ship/CLAUDE.md

claude-skills / ship

CLAUDE.md0 starsChanged 30 days agoMITView on GitHub

Rules bound to /ship's own pipeline. Cross-cutting rules (marker hashing, test-command:/ deploy-command: trust boundary) live in the root CLAUDE.md.

  • Reads credentials

The file

Files
CLAUDE.md

/ship internals

Rules bound to /ship's own pipeline. Cross-cutting rules (marker hashing, test-command:/ deploy-command: trust boundary) live in the root CLAUDE.md.

Gotchas

  • /ship's docs phase runs before the commit on purpose. Phase 0.8 in ship/SKILL.md inventories the repo's own docs (README, CLAUDE.md, CHANGELOG, docs/**, help pages, .env.example, SKILL.md), runs check-docs-claims.sh for the mechanical part, and updates whatever the diff invalidated. It sits before Phase 1 so the change and its documentation land in one commit rather than in a follow-up nobody writes; Phase 1's git add -u picks the edits up, since every file it may touch is already tracked. It never creates a doc file that does not exist (this repo has no CHANGELOG, and /ship must not invent one) and it never rewrites prose the diff did not invalidate. Since the 2026-10-03 /audit rebuild there is no audit docs worker any more, so this phase is the only place docs get synced. When it edits a doc, one fact-checker agent checks the changed claims against the code before the commit (added 2026-10-03; no doc edits, no dispatch). /ship therefore needs Edit in allowed-tools; it previously had only Read/Write, and a whole-file Write is the wrong instrument for a surgical README correction. Doc-only edits deliberately do not invalidate a fresh audit marker: they are prose by the same definition classify-diff.sh uses, so Phase 2 keeps checking marker age only.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.