agentleFS
quietmachineworksquietmachineworks/qmw/skills/status/SKILL.md

status

Skill0 starsChanged 2 months agoMITView on GitHub

Read qmw's own records under .qmw/ and report where the work stands - open bugs, changes landed, dependencies held with the price of unblocking them, the last release verdict. Writes nothing. Use when asked what has been done on a project, what is still open, where things stand, whether a bug was ever fixed, what is blocked, or to catch up on a codebase qmw has already worked.

177 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use off, list and 9 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • StakeholderSenseiSkill

    off

    Disable polygraph for this repo (user-only escape hatch; all hooks no-op)

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • SuShuhengSkill

    list

    Use when checking obshare-cli upload history, finding document tokens, or reviewing previous upload URLs and permission snapshots.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • kennethleungtySkill

    pause

    Pause — stop the music (alias for /stop)

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • codebycoreySkill

    new

    Start a new change with a proposal. Use when starting a feature, creating a proposal, or beginning planned work.

    Also in 7 projects that use this

  • michaelenglandSkill

    import

    This skill should be used when the user wants to import an existing .pptx file into deckwright, bring in a PowerPoint that was created outside this tool, reverse-engineer a presentation for editing, or invoke /deckwright:import. Converts a .pptx into a PptxGenJS generation script so it can be edited and regenerated through the deckwright pipeline.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • genomewalkerSkill

    resume

    Resume a thread by loading its ~800-token context capsule

    Also in 15 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 146 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Write nothing: No files, no config, no commits, no "while I was there".

    line 19

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 146 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Status

The running record of what has been done to a project: the repairs signed off, the bugs still open, the last release verdict. Read it when you pick a codebase back up, so the work continues where it was left rather than from a blank slate. This skill reads qmw's own records and reports where the work stands.

The other reading skill, audit-agent, audits the agent: what is installed and what it earns. This one audits the work: what qmw has produced, across every record it left. Neither touches code.

Write nothing. No files, no config, no commits, no "while I was there". This skill reads the records and reports them; it never appends an entry, closes one, or tidies one. An entry that changed is a lie about what qmw actually did.

What it reads

qmw's records live under .qmw/ at the repository top, one subdirectory per skill.

  • .qmw/fix-bug/ - log.md is the index, one row per incident with its status and how many times it was seen; SQ-<n>/report.md carries the root cause and the proof. The open incidents are the finding that matters most.
  • .qmw/run-qa/ - the registry, with its resume-point block and its rows by status; config.md and the persona briefs say what a pass covers. Report the open findings and where a pass in progress was left.
  • .qmw/refactor/log.md - one block per intervention, the class closed and the commit. The next line of the last block is a candidate someone named and did not start.
  • .qmw/build-feature/log.md - one block per intention landed, the class of change and the commit, with its own next line.
  • .qmw/upgrade-deps/log.md - raised, and held. The held section is the live one: each hold carries the price of unblocking it, and a hold whose price is a refactor of the project's own code is a /qmw:refactor mandate already written.
  • .ratchet/ - the checks the project froze and their baselines, when it carries them. A baseline is a number frozen in time, not a live count; report what is guarded, not a fresh measurement.

A record the project does not carry is named as absent, not invented. A project qmw has never touched leaves no records, and that is the honest first line of the report.

Read the records, do not re-run the skills. This skill does not reproduce a bug to check it is still open, re-measure a ratchet, or replay a release check. It reports what the records say and how fresh they are. A record that looks stale against the tree (a fix-bug incident open on a screen that no longer exists, an upgrade-deps hold on a dependency already raised) is a finding worth naming, not a repair to make.

The report

In the language of the conversation, read in a terminal. No tables: flat blocks, so nothing wraps at eighty columns.

Open with the picture in a few lines: which records exist, the date of the most recent entry across all of them, and the one sentence a returning reader wants, usually the count of what is still open. Then, grouped by record and ordered by what needs attention first:

fix-bug       2 open, oldest SQ-9 P1 on /billing, seen 3 times, red since 2026-08
  the report reproduces; no root cause recorded yet
upgrade-deps  1 held: left-pad, blocked on an API migration touching 4 files
  the price is a /qmw:refactor mandate, already written in the hold
refactor      last landed RF-7 on 2026-08-25; its next line names RF-8, not started

That block is nonsense on purpose; a real report comes from the records read, never from this file. Each line is a fact the reader can act on: a status, a date, a count, and the single next thing the record itself points at.

Detail what needs a decision; list the rest. An open P1, a hold whose price is now cheap to pay, a pass left mid-resume: these get their block. Everything green and closed is one line, named and counted, under a closing "also" line per record. A report that reads back every closed entry buries the two that are still open.

Close on what to do

The last thing printed is the action list, three to five lines, ordered by what is most worth picking up, written so each can be pasted or asked for:

/qmw:fix-bug resume SQ-9 - open P1, reproduces, no root cause recorded yet
/qmw:upgrade-deps left-pad - the hold's blocker is now a 4-file refactor, priced in the log
/qmw:refactor RF-8 - named as next by the last refactor, never started

Each action is the record's own next step, handed back as an invocation. The skill does not decide what to work on; it says where the work was left and lets the reader choose. Nothing comes after the actions. The bottom of a terminal is the slot next to the prompt, and the actions own it.

Say where the run broke its own budget

One line per deviation, after the report and before the actions, only when there is one:

deviated: appended a note to a log it only reads, this skill writes nothing
deviated: reproduced SQ-9 to check it still fails, this skill reads records only

Nothing to say is the normal case, and then print nothing at all: not deviated: none, not a compliance note. Only what can be counted belongs here - files written against zero, the skills re-run against reading records only. A report that quietly repaired what it read is no longer a record of what qmw did, it is a record of what this skill did.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.