agent-workflow-governance
Skill253 starsChanged 32 days agoMITView on GitHub
用户要求整体检查项目治理规则的承载位置、精简常驻约束,或判断散落资料能否沉淀为 Skill、脚本或 Hook 时使用。只读识别主源、重复工作流与自动化缺口,给出证据和最小建议;单项文档维护直接使用已有专项 Skill。
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Seekers2001/docs-governanceword for word, first seen Oct 13, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- Seekers2001/docs-governance★ 320100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository20 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- agent-entrypointsSkill
- architecture-docsSkill
- context-and-decisionsSkill
- docs-auditSkill
- docs-governanceSkill
- docs-maintenanceSkill
- docs-retroSkill
- docs-structureSkill
- domain-modelingSkill
- living-docs-governanceSkill
- module-governanceSkill
- product-evolutionSkill
- writing-for-agentsSkill
- change-impactSkill
- contract-firstSkill
- loop-design-checkSkill
- module-regressionSkill
- test-collaborationSkill
The file
Files
项目治理规则与工作流落点检查
输入为目标项目根、任务范围、规则与资料入口、现有 Skills 和自动化配置。管理治理规则的分工,不代替需求、架构和测试等专项判断。
- 固定范围。 读取项目共享入口、地图与任务要求,记录基线和未提交变化。全局配置、个人记忆与历史会话不在本检查范围。
- 按需采集。 执行规则与工作流落点检查,沿代表性任务检查入口、规范、Skill、参考和已有自动化;大型项目分批,明确未覆盖项。仅需项目健康静态证据时,复用 living-docs-governance 的项目健康采集流程。
- 判断落点。 优先复用已有 Skill、附件、脚本和触发链。将项目事实与可复用方法分开,保留核心约束、主源与历史依据;不因一份文档长就新建 Skill。
- 交付并停止。 输出“规则/工作流 → 证据与版本 → 当前载体 → 建议落点 → 最小下一步 → 验证办法”,区分问题、未发现问题、不适用和未验证。只读交付即停止;不迁移正文、合并或删除 Skill、安装 Hook 或修改门禁。证据不足只暂停依赖该证据的结论。
规则文字与配置存在不证明宿主行为有效。后续实施须有对应授权;此检查不自动执行所发现的命令。历史经验提炼与效果回查另由后续议题承接,已有经验判断优先复用 docs-retro。
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

