Qclaw / rules
Cursor rule2.8k starsChanged 8 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Qclaw 開源貢獻的 Git 工作流程、Commit 格式與分支命名
- Commits and pushes
In this repository2 other files it gives its agents.
- .cursor/rules/electron-ipc.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/qclaw-project.mdcCursor rule
The file
Files
--- description: Qclaw 開源貢獻的 Git 工作流程、Commit 格式與分支命名 alwaysApply: true --- # Git 工作流程 ## Remote 設定 | Remote | 指向 | 用途 | |--------|------|------| | `origin` | `JasonYang318/Qclaw`(fork) | 推送改動 | | `upstream` | `qiuzhi2046/Qclaw`(原始) | 同步最新版 | ## 同步上游 ```powershell git fetch upstream git checkout main git merge upstream/main git push origin main ``` ## 分支命名 - 新功能:`feat/<功能名>` - 修 bug:`fix/<問題描述>` - 文件:`docs/<主題>` ## Commit 訊息格式 ``` <type>: <簡述> ``` | 前綴 | 用途 | |------|------| | `feat` | 新功能 | | `fix` | 修 bug | | `docs` | 文件變更 | | `refactor` | 重構 | | `test` | 測試 | | `chore` | 工具 / 設定 | ## PR 流程 1. 先開 GitHub Issue,等維護者確認方向 2. 在自己的 fork 分支開發 3. 跑完三個驗證指令後再 commit 4. 推送到 `origin`,開 PR 指向 `qiuzhi2046/Qclaw`
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

