planning-and-task-decomposition
Skill3 starsChanged 14 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Turn clear requirements into an ordered, verifiable implementation plan. Use when a spec or well-understood goal needs decomposition before coding — when the task feels too large to start, the order of work isn't obvious, or scope must be communicated. Trigger phrases include: "plan this", "break this down", "make an implementation plan", "how should we implement this", "create a task list", "what order should we build this in". This skill defines HOW to build and in what order — it assumes WHAT to build is already pinned down. If requirements are loose, unverified, or missing, first run the task-scoping skill (task-scope-and-spec: scope a loose engineering task into a tight, testable spec list) or gather inputs per the Input Gate below.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- codebase-researchSkill
- explain-codeSkill
- goal-workflowSkill
- guided-implementationSkill
- hac-initSkill
- helpSkill
- interview-meSkill
- notion-cliSkill
- playwright-cliSkill
- pr-descriptionSkill
- python-code-reviewSkill
- python-devSkill
- python-project-scaffoldSkill
- systematic-debuggingSkill
- task-handoverSkill
- task-scope-and-specSkill
- write-testsSkill
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. About 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈14
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.