agentleFS
PydanticKnown publisherpydantic/pydantic-ai-harness/AGENTS.md

pydantic-ai-harness

AGENTS.md954 starsChanged 4 months agoMITView on GitHub

pydantic-ai-harness is the first-party capability library for Pydantic AI. Pydantic AI core owns the primitive runtime: agent loop semantics, normalized messages, model/provider/profile behavior, tool execution semantics, durable execution primitives, and generic capability hooks. Harness owns optional, batteries-included compositions built from those primitives: coding-agent tools, guardrails, memory, context management, repo tools, verification loops, skills, planning, sub-agents, and other reusable agent behaviors. When a change needs new core semantics, stop and propose the Pydantic AI core change instead of reimplementing core behavior…

  • Installs packages

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this AGENTS.md into the rules it gives an agent

31 rules. About 0 are common, 19 are distinctive, and 12 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈19

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 12

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    When a change needs new core semantics, stop and propose the Pydantic AI core change instead of reimplementing core behavior in harness.

    line 16
  2. Distinctive:

    Before implementing or reviewing a capability change:

    line 32
  3. Very specific:

    Read the linked agent_docs/ guide for the task.

    line 35
  4. Distinctive:

    Read the public Pydantic AI docs for every integration point you touch:

    line 36
  5. Very specific:

    Use pydantic_ai_harness.code_mode as the exemplar for capability shape, docs, tests, and public exports until another capability becomes a …

    line 45
  6. Very specific:

    If .agents/skills/branch-context/issue-brief.md exists, read it plus pr-decisions.md and the latest handoff before making design decisions.

    line 61
  7. Distinctive:

    When implementing a new capability, reference these docs:

    line 68
  8. Very specific:

    Follow the naming convention in agent_docs/capability-authoring.md ("Naming Capabilities"): a noun when the capability names a thing (a …

    line 81
  9. Distinctive:

    Do not run coverage locally unless CI reports a specific coverage gap.

    line 108
  10. Very specific:

    no typecasting (as in TypeScript, cast() in Python) -- use type narrowing instead

    line 111
  11. Distinctive:

    prefer the most generic input types possible (reduce dependency chains)

    line 112
  12. Distinctive:

    don't add comments that restate what the code does

    line 113
  13. Very specific:

    No em-dashes (—). Use -- for an aside or interruption, or split into two sentences.

    line 119
  14. Distinctive:

    Avoid absolute claims ("never", "always", "guaranteed") unless they are literally true and load-bearing.

    line 124
  15. Distinctive:

    Use bold sparingly -- for the lead-in term of a list item, not to emphasize whole sentences.

    line 127
  16. Distinctive:

    Document the why, the constraints, and the non-obvious.

    line 129
  17. Distinctive:

    Prefer plain ASCII punctuation over decorative Unicode (arrows, fancy quotes) in prose and comments.

    line 131
  18. Distinctive:

    Run Ruff across the repository.

    line 142
  19. Distinctive:

    Do not run repository-wide Pyright, pytest, or coverage locally.

    line 152
  20. Distinctive:

    If CI reports a coverage gap, run coverage only for the flagged file or focused test.

    line 153
  21. Very specific:

    Use uv pip for Python 3.10 to resolve Harness without CLAI's Python requirement.

    line 173
  22. Very specific:

    Do not add placeholder template files for new capabilities.

    line 194
  23. Very specific:

    Import TestModel from pydantic_ai.models.test for model behavior.

    line 200
  24. Distinctive:

    Keep real provider calls out of tests.

    line 201
  25. Very specific:

    Prefer tests through Agent(..., capabilities=[...]) when that is the public behavior.

    line 205
  26. Very specific:

    Don't import private (_-prefixed) helpers into tests.

    line 208
  27. Very specific:

    Test async behavior directly, following agent_docs/concurrency.md: assert the cancellation, the ordering, or the cleanup itself rather than …

    line 216
  28. Distinctive:

    Always link sources for any claims made during research

    line 224
  29. Distinctive:

    Commit messages should summarize the "why", not the "what"

    line 225
  30. Distinctive:

    Pushing is not the end of the task: After you push, do not go idle.

    line 240
  31. Distinctive:

    Do not leave work uncommitted: Don't end a turn with unstaged or uncommitted local changes unless the user's own instructions say otherwise.

    line 244

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 40,246 AGENTS.md files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
AGENTS.md

Pydantic AI Harness

Repository purpose

pydantic-ai-harness is the first-party capability library for Pydantic AI.

Pydantic AI core owns the primitive runtime: agent loop semantics, normalized messages, model/provider/profile behavior, tool execution semantics, durable execution primitives, and generic capability hooks.

Harness owns optional, batteries-included compositions built from those primitives: coding-agent tools, guardrails, memory, context management, repo tools, verification loops, skills, planning, sub-agents, and other reusable agent behaviors.

When a change needs new core semantics, stop and propose the Pydantic AI core change instead of reimplementing core behavior in harness.

Vocabulary

  • Capability: an AbstractCapability subclass that bundles tools, hooks, instructions, and model settings into a reusable unit. This is the core abstraction of pydantic-ai-harness.
  • Hook: a lifecycle method on AbstractCapability that intercepts agent graph execution (e.g. before_model_request, wrap_run, after_tool_execute)
  • Toolset: a collection of tools that a capability can provide to the agent
  • Guard: a type of capability that validates inputs/outputs or controls tool access (e.g. InputGuard, OutputGuard)
  • Harness: this package -- a collection of pre-made capabilities for Pydantic AI.
  • AICA: AI Code Assistant -- the automated agent that implements issues, reviews plans, and handles PR feedback
  • Ralph loop: the state-machine-based workflow that drives AICA through phases (TRIAGE -> GOALS -> PLAN -> CODE -> VERIFY -> REVIEW -> PUBLISH)
  • DDD+ protocol: classification system for PR review comments (do, dismiss, discuss, waiting, done)

AICA preflight

Before implementing or reviewing a capability change:

  1. Read agent_docs/index.md.
  2. Read the linked agent_docs/ guide for the task.
  3. Read the public Pydantic AI docs for every integration point you touch:
  4. Inspect the installed pydantic_ai package source for exact hook/toolset signatures when needed. Do not assume a contributor's local checkout layout.
  5. Use pydantic_ai_harness.code_mode as the exemplar for capability shape, docs, tests, and public exports until another capability becomes a better example. Capabilities live in their own top-level submodule pydantic_ai_harness/<name>/ (module name = capability name; one module per capability or strategy) and are not re-exported from the root __init__.py, so each keeps its own optional dependencies. The experimental tier is retired; ACP is the sole remaining experimental capability (see agent_docs/capability-authoring.md, "Capability Submodules And Exports").

Branch context (optional)

.agents/skills/branch-context/ is opt-in per-branch state for work that spans sessions: an issue brief, an append-only decisions log, and session handoffs. The scaffolding (SKILL.md, scripts, *.template.md) is committed; the instances are git-ignored and created per branch.

  • If .agents/skills/branch-context/issue-brief.md exists, read it plus pr-decisions.md and the latest handoff before making design decisions.
  • To adopt a branch, instantiate the surfaces from the templates or run /adopt-pr. Contributors who never instantiate them can ignore this section.

Capabilities API reference

When implementing a new capability, reference these docs:

Capability naming

Follow the naming convention in agent_docs/capability-authoring.md ("Naming Capabilities"): a noun when the capability names a thing (a tool or faculty the model uses, a subsystem, a named strategy); an imperative verb phrase when it acts on the run and one verb phrase states its entire contract. Never invent a nominalization for an action, and never name a capability after the problem it solves.

Telemetry

OpenTelemetry is part of a feature's design, not a follow-up. Every new capability decides what it emits before it merges, from the point of view of someone operating a run in production and asking what happened, why the run changed course, and what it cost.

Emitting nothing is a valid answer when core's own spans already cover the work. It is an answer to state in the docs, not a step to skip.

The house pattern (spans on ctx.tracer, attribute naming, content behind trace_include_content) is in agent_docs/capability-authoring.md "Telemetry".

Coding standards

  • Python 3.10+ (target version for pyright and ruff)
  • pyright strict mode -- no Any types, full type annotations
  • ruff: line-length=120, single quotes, max-complexity=15
  • CI enforces 100% branch coverage from combined matrix data.
  • Do not run coverage locally unless CI reports a specific coverage gap.
  • Investigate a reported gap with focused coverage for the flagged file or test.
  • docstrings use single backticks (markdown), not RST double backticks
  • no typecasting (as in TypeScript, cast() in Python) -- use type narrowing instead
  • prefer the most generic input types possible (reduce dependency chains)
  • don't add comments that restate what the code does

Writing style

Applies to docs, READMEs, docstrings, comments, commit messages, and PR text.

  • No em-dashes (—). Use -- for an aside or interruption, or split into two sentences. Em-dash-heavy prose reads as machine-generated.
  • State facts, not sales copy. Cut marketing superlatives and hype ("blazingly fast", "battle-tested", "the single most expensive thing you can do", "footgun") and editorializing adjectives ("sprawling", "noisy", "silently").
  • Avoid absolute claims ("never", "always", "guaranteed") unless they are literally true and load-bearing. Name the specific mechanism instead of the slogan.
  • Use bold sparingly -- for the lead-in term of a list item, not to emphasize whole sentences.
  • Document the why, the constraints, and the non-obvious. Don't restate what the code or signature already says.
  • Prefer plain ASCII punctuation over decorative Unicode (arrows, fancy quotes) in prose and comments.

Package management

  • Change dependencies only when required. Use uv and link an issue.
  • PRs touching pyproject.toml or uv.lock require the dependencies:approved label; pushes clear approval.

Local verification

Run Ruff across the repository. Run Pyright and pytest for the paths that you modify.

uv run --no-sync ruff format --check .
uv run --no-sync ruff check .
PYRIGHT_PYTHON_IGNORE_WARNINGS=1 uv run --no-sync pyright pydantic_ai_harness/<module>.py tests/<module>.py
uv run --no-sync pytest -p no:cacheprovider tests/<capability>

CI runs the repository-wide typecheck, test, and combined coverage gates. Do not run repository-wide Pyright, pytest, or coverage locally. If CI reports a coverage gap, run coverage only for the flagged file or focused test.

Workspace And Python 3.10

uv sync --locked --all-packages --all-extras --group lint

Harness and pydantic-clai2 share the root uv.lock, .venv, and Pyright configuration. Workspace commands require Python 3.11+ because CLAI depends on Termflow. Harness's package metadata and Pyright target remain Python 3.10+. Tracking issue: https://github.com/pydantic/pydantic-ai-harness/issues/875.

uv venv /tmp/harness-py310 --python 3.10
uv pip install --python /tmp/harness-py310/bin/python --resolution lowest-direct --group dev \
  --editable . --requirements pyproject.toml --all-extras
/tmp/harness-py310/bin/python -m pytest -p no:cacheprovider tests/code_mode

Use uv pip for Python 3.10 to resolve Harness without CLAI's Python requirement. CI retains Python 3.10 slim, all-extras, and lowest-versions jobs. The slim and all-extras installs use the shared lock's versions as ceilings, allowing older releases when a locked dependency requires Python 3.11+. Run the environment's Python directly so uv run does not select the workspace interpreter.

File structure

The tree is discoverable by listing it; only the conventions that are not are recorded here.

Each released capability is a self-contained package under pydantic_ai_harness/<capability>/ (naming and exports are covered in the preflight above), with tests under tests/<capability>/. It ships two hand-maintained docs that must stay in sync: the README.md next to the code (GitHub/PyPI) and the docs/<capability>.md page (the docs site at pydantic.dev/docs/ai/harness). The docs/ folder is flat -- there are no capabilities/ or experimental/ subdirectories. A user-facing change updates both; agent_docs/review-checklist.md "Docs" and the docs-parity-reviewer subagent enforce the parity before merge.

Do not add placeholder template files for new capabilities. Start from the existing CodeMode package shape, then delete what the new capability does not need.

Testing patterns

  • Import TestModel from pydantic_ai.models.test for model behavior.
  • Keep real provider calls out of tests.
  • ALLOW_MODEL_REQUESTS = False is set globally in conftest.py
  • Tests use pytest-anyio for async support
  • Each capability test class follows: TestCapabilityName with methods test_<scenario>
  • Prefer tests through Agent(..., capabilities=[...]) when that is the public behavior. Use direct Toolset/RunContext tests for lower-level lifecycle, schema, retry, or wrapper behavior that is hard to isolate through Agent.
  • Don't import private (_-prefixed) helpers into tests. Exercise them through the capability's public surface so tests survive internal refactors: drive the behavior through Agent(..., capabilities=[...]), or import the public class re-exported from the capability package's __init__.py (e.g. from pydantic_ai_harness.filesystem import FileSystemToolset, not from pydantic_ai_harness.filesystem._toolset import _content_hash). When a branch is only reachable by calling a private helper directly, mark it # pragma: no cover rather than reaching into the helper from a test.
  • Test async behavior directly, following agent_docs/concurrency.md: assert the cancellation, the ordering, or the cleanup itself rather than the output it happens to produce; order steps with Events instead of sleeps; and reach the real trigger (a real outer anyio cancel scope, the Trio parametrization where the suite has it) rather than a stand-in.

Contributing rules for AICAs

  • Always link sources for any claims made during research
  • Commit messages should summarize the "why", not the "what"
  • PR titles feed the release notes verbatim -- GitHub builds "What's Changed" from them. Write an imperative sentence naming the change, and wrap every code identifier (class names, keyword arguments, module paths, CLI flags, env vars, file paths) in backticks. No feat: / fix: / docs: prefix -- that belongs on the commit subject, not the title. Merged titles predating this rule carry prefixes; follow the rule, not the back catalogue.

Pushing changes

A restriction is a conclusion you earn from a real failure, not a field you read. Never report an operation as blocked, unavailable, or not-permitted based on a metadata flag, a config field, or a docs claim — attempt it and quote the actual error. (maintainerCanModify: false on a PR does not mean you cannot push: it governs the upstream-maintainer auto-grant, not your own access to the fork.) If you genuinely cannot attempt it, say "not attempted", never "we can't".

Pushing is not the end of the task. After you push, do not go idle. The work is done when CI is green and there are no unresolved comments — see the pushing-commits-to-the-repo skill for the full loop.

Do not leave work uncommitted. Don't end a turn with unstaged or uncommitted local changes unless the user's own instructions say otherwise.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.