agentleFS
pumpkit-iopumpkit-io/sdlc/skills/commands/triage/SKILL.md

triage

Skill2 starsChanged 10 days agoMITView on GitHub

Move issues and external PRs through a state machine of triage roles, categorise, verify, grill if needed, and write agent-ready briefs.

189 other projects use a version of this, 76 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use writing-beats, setup-matt-pocock-skills and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • LesaniSkill

    writing-beats

    Shape an article as a journey of beats, choose-your-own-adventure style. The user picks a starting beat from the raw material, you write only that beat, then offer options for where to pivot next, beat by beat, until the article reaches a natural end. Use when the user has raw material and wants to assemble it as a narrative rather than an argument.

    Also in 66 projects that use this

  • GoogleSkill

    setup-matt-pocock-skills

    Configure this repo for the engineering skills — set up its issue tracker, triage label vocabulary, and domain doc layout. Run once before first use of the other engineering skills.

    Also in 167 projects that use this

  • liufeng1976Skill

    setup-ts-deep-modules

    Wire dependency-cruiser into a TypeScript repo so each package is a deep module — implementation hidden in subfolders, reachable only through its entry-point files. User-invoked.

    Also in 42 projects that use this

  • SethGammonSkill

    ascii-diagram

    Generate perfectly aligned ASCII diagrams — architecture, flow, sequence, box-and-arrow. Uses a programmatic character-grid approach so alignment is guaranteed by math, not token prediction. Includes post-render verification.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • simo97Skill

    migrate-to-shoehorn

    Migrate test files from `as` type assertions to @total-typescript/shoehorn. Use when user mentions shoehorn, wants to replace `as` in tests, or needs partial test data.

    Also in 68 projects that use this

  • LesaniSkill

    writing-shape

    Take a markdown file of raw material and shape it into an article through a conversational session — drafting candidate openings, growing the piece paragraph by paragraph, arguing about format (lists, tables, callouts, quotes) at each step. Use when the user has a pile of notes, fragments, or a rough draft and wants help turning it into something publishable.

    Also in 63 projects that use this

  • +1 more from Lesani

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

5 rules. 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 176 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Every comment or issue posted to the issue tracker during triage must start with this disclaimer:

    line 13
  2. Distinctive:

    Every triaged issue should carry exactly one category role and one state role.

    line 45
  3. Very specific:

    Grill (if needed): If the request needs fleshing out, load the grilling and domain-modeling skills, and grill it into shape a round of …

    line 80
  4. Very specific:

    Rejected (enhancement): write to .out-of-scope/, link to it from a comment, then close (OUT-OF-SCOPE.md).

    line 89
  5. Distinctive:

    If prior triage notes exist on the issue or PR, read them, check whether the reporter has answered any outstanding questions, and present …

    line 116

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 176 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Triage

Move issues on the project issue tracker through a small state machine of triage roles.

If this repo treats external pull requests as a request surface (see the issue-tracker config), triage covers them too: a PR is an issue with attached code, using the same roles, same states, and same machine, with a few deltas marked "for a PR" below. Resolve a bare #42 to an issue or PR per the tracker config.

Every comment or issue posted to the issue tracker during triage must start with this disclaimer:

> *This was generated by AI during triage.*

Reference docs

  • AGENT-BRIEF.md: how to write durable agent briefs
  • OUT-OF-SCOPE.md: how the .out-of-scope/ knowledge base works

Worktree

Triage writes repo files in two places: grilling (GLOSSARY.md, ADRs) and a rejected enhancement's .out-of-scope/ entry. Reading the tracker, labelling and commenting need no worktree. Load the worktrees skill and resolve the worktree for this work before writing anything. Commit the files there, and when the triage of that issue or PR is done, release this session's worktree lock, as the worktrees skill's Release section says.

Roles

Two category roles:

  • bug: something is broken
  • enhancement: new feature or improvement

Five state roles:

  • needs-triage: maintainer needs to evaluate
  • needs-info: waiting on reporter for more information
  • ready-for-agent: fully specified, ready for an AFK agent
  • ready-for-human: needs human implementation
  • wontfix: will not be actioned

For a PR, the same states read against the attached code: ready-for-agent means a brief is attached and an agent should take the next step on the diff; ready-for-human means it's ready for a human to merge.

Every triaged issue should carry exactly one category role and one state role. If state roles conflict, flag it and ask the maintainer before doing anything else.

These are canonical role names, and by default also the label strings. If docs/agents/triage-labels.md exists, it maps roles to the label strings this repo actually uses: apply those instead.

State transitions: an unlabeled issue normally goes to needs-triage first; from there it moves to needs-info, ready-for-agent, ready-for-human, or wontfix. needs-info returns to needs-triage once the reporter replies. The maintainer can override at any time; flag transitions that look unusual and ask before proceeding.

Invocation

The maintainer invokes /triage and describes what they want in natural language. Interpret the request and act. Examples:

  • "Show me anything that needs my attention"
  • "Let's look at #42" (issue or PR)
  • "Move #42 to ready-for-agent"
  • "What's ready for agents to pick up?"

Show what needs attention

Query the issue tracker and present three buckets, oldest first:

  1. Unlabeled: never triaged.
  2. needs-triage: evaluation in progress.
  3. needs-info with reporter activity since the last triage notes: needs re-evaluation.

When PRs are in scope, include external PRs in these buckets and tag each line [PR] or [issue]. Discovery surfaces only external PRs (the tracker config defines who counts as external), so a collaborator's in-flight PR is not triage work. This filter is discovery-only; an explicitly named PR is always triaged regardless of author.

Show counts and a one-line summary per item. Let the maintainer pick.

Triage a specific issue or PR

  1. Gather context. Read the full issue or PR (body, comments, labels, author, dates; for a PR, the diff too). Parse any prior triage notes so you don't re-ask resolved questions. Explore the codebase using the project's domain glossary, respecting ADRs in the area. Run two checks against the codebase: (a) redundancy: search for an existing implementation of the requested behavior by domain concept (not just the request's wording), and report where you looked. If found, it's an already-implemented wontfix (step 5). (b) prior rejection: read .out-of-scope/*.md and surface any that resembles this request.
  2. Recommend. Tell the maintainer your category and state recommendation with reasoning, plus a brief codebase summary relevant to the request (including whether it's already implemented). Wait for direction.
  3. Verify the claim. Before any grilling, check that the claim holds up. For a bug, reproduce it from the reporter's steps. For a PR, confirm the diff does what it claims: fetch its head into a local branch named triage/pr-<number> (the tracker config says how), open it with the worktrees skill's create, and run the relevant tests or commands there. Once verified, finish that worktree through the worktrees skill; the PR is open, so its finish takes --pr-open. Report what happened: confirmed (with code path), failed, or insufficient detail (a strong needs-info signal). A confirmed verification makes a much stronger agent brief.
  4. Grill (if needed). If the request needs fleshing out, load the grilling and domain-modeling skills, and grill it into shape a round of questions at a time, sharpening domain terms and updating GLOSSARY.md/ADRs inline as decisions land.
  5. Apply the outcome. Load the prose-style skill and write every comment, brief and .out-of-scope/ entry in that style.
    • ready-for-agent: post an agent brief comment (AGENT-BRIEF.md).
    • ready-for-human: same structure as an agent brief, but note why it can't be delegated (judgment calls, external access, design decisions, manual testing).
    • needs-info: post triage notes (template below).
    • For wontfix, close the issue, with the comment depending on why:
      • Already implemented: the change already exists in the codebase. Point to where it lives; do not write to .out-of-scope/ (that KB is for rejected requests, not built ones).
      • Rejected (bug): give a polite explanation, then close.
      • Rejected (enhancement): write to .out-of-scope/, link to it from a comment, then close (OUT-OF-SCOPE.md).
    • needs-triage: apply the role. Optional comment if there's partial progress.

Quick state override

If the maintainer says "move #42 to ready-for-agent", trust them and apply the role directly. Confirm what you're about to do (role changes, comment, close), then act. Skip grilling. If moving to ready-for-agent without a grilling session, ask whether they want to write an agent brief.

Needs-info template

## Triage Notes

**What we've established so far:**

- point 1
- point 2

**What we still need from you (@reporter):**

- question 1
- question 2

Capture everything resolved during grilling under "established so far" so the work isn't lost. Questions must be specific and actionable, not "please provide more info".

Resuming a previous session

If prior triage notes exist on the issue or PR, read them, check whether the reporter has answered any outstanding questions, and present an updated picture before continuing. Don't re-ask resolved questions.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.