project
Skill3 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Create and manage the project structure - projects, sub-projects, and work packages (WPs). Actions - new project, new subproject, new WP, overview. Hierarchy depth (2 or 3 levels) is fixed at creation. All work happens in WPs; projects and sub-projects are pure structure.
39 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- saksham10arora-dotcom/everything-claude-codextheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- kriscard/Skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 28, 2026
- jantichy/claudetheir own version, first seen Oct 27, 2026
- usk6666/yorishiro-proxytheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
- baney75/myelinatetheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- jurapascal/claude-code-hubtheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use next, learn and 7 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
VercelSkillnext
Next.js renderer for json-render that turns JSON specs into full Next.js applications with routes, layouts, SSR, and metadata. Use when working with @json-render/next, building Next.js apps from JSON specs, or creating AI-generated multi-page applications.
Also in 3 projects that use this
genomewalkerSkilllearn
Learn from web sources, generate SKILL.md, and store key patterns in soul memory. Trigger keywords: learn, skill-gen, web-learn, documentation, tutorial.
Also in 8 projects that use this
Microsoft AzureSkilltest
Also in 6 projects that use this
OpenAISkillaudit
Audit or critique a product flow, journey, workflow, funnel, onboarding path, checkout path, settings path, screen, or multi-step product experience by capturing screenshots first, then reporting UX, design, and accessibility findings inline from that evidence. Use Figma only when the user explicitly asks for a board. Use when the user asks to audit, review, critique, inspect, assess, analyze, evaluate, or give feedback on a product experience.
Also in 5 projects that use this
GoogleSkillteach
Teach the user a new skill or concept, within this workspace.
Also in 4 projects that use this
SentrySkillreview
Fixture review skill.
Also in 5 projects that use this
Other versions39 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 39
- fleetdm/fleet★ 7.2ksame name
- samchon/typia★ 6ksame name
- samchon/nestia★ 2.2ksame name
- cwinvestments/memstack★ 425same name
- AlpacaLabsLLC/skills-for-architects★ 390same name
- Achuan-2/siyuan-plugin-task-note-management★ 227same name
- HurricaHjz/SecondSelf★ 156same name
- Soul-Brews-Studio/arra-oracle-skills-cli★ 121same name
- HurricaHjz/second-yourself★ 105same name
- cybaea/obsidian-vault-intelligence★ 79same name
29 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
The file
Show its rules and text
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
21 rules. 0 are common, 11 are distinctive, and 10 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 32 edited versions we read keep these.
11
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
10
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 12
If the requested action is ambiguous or contradictory (matches multiple actions, arguments conflict with the action, or the intent is …
- Very specific: line 22
Every project is either 2-level or 3-level (root CLAUDE.md, Hierarchy Protocol).
- Very specific: line 29
Before any action other than "new project": read vault/projects/<project>/ids.md, take Levels, and obey it.
- Distinctive: line 51
If the action was unknown, say so first, then show the table.
- Distinctive: line 57
Ask for anything missing: name and overall goals.
- Distinctive: line 59
Creation mode: Ask how the structure should be built (in simple tier use plain words: "build as we go" vs.
- Very specific: line 63
Create projects/<ACR>-<name>/ — the confirmed acronym as an uppercase prefix, then the kebab-case name (e.g.
- Distinctive: line 65
No resources/ or outputs/ — those exist only in WPs.
- Distinctive: line 95
Add a routing map row to root CLAUDE.md (using the prefixed folder name).
- Very specific: line 97
If the Todos module (M3) is active: offer a board/task setup for the project (/todos board <name> in Notion mode) — offer only, never …
- Distinctive: line 104
If no project is named: list existing projects and ask which one.
- Very specific: line 105
Check the depth: Read Levels from vault/projects/<project>/ids.md.
- Distinctive: line 106
Ask for anything missing: sub-project name (kebab-case) and purpose.
- Very specific: line 108
Create projects/<project>/<SS>-<sub>/ directly in the project (no sub-projects/ wrapper) — pure structure, no CLAUDE.md, no …
- Distinctive: line 119
Ask for details: WP name (kebab-case) and purpose (one sentence minimum).
- Very specific: line 121
2-level: read Next WP from ids.md, use it as WW, add the row (number, WP folder, Next task: 01, Next output: 001), bump Next WP.
- Very specific: line 122
3-level: read Next WP from the owning sub-project's row, use it as WW, add the WP row (ID <SS>-<WW>, folder path, Next task: 01, Next …
- Very specific: line 123
Create <WW>-<wp>/ directly in the owning unit (no work-packages/ wrapper) with resources/ and outputs/ — the WW prefix from step 3, two …
- Distinctive: line 125
Update the project CLAUDE.md Structure section.
- Distinctive: line 137
Never create resources/ or outputs/ outside a WP.
- Very specific: line 143
All created folder and file names follow the Latin-alphabet kebab-case convention (root CLAUDE.md, Output Hygiene & Naming).
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 32 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Task
Execute the requested action: $ARGUMENTS
Calling rule: /project <action> <arguments>.
If the requested action is ambiguous or contradictory (matches multiple actions, arguments conflict with the action, or the intent is unclear), do NOT guess: flag the ambiguity and ask for clarification before executing.
Core principle: work is done at WP level only. Projects and sub-projects are organizational structure. If the user asks for work on a project or sub-project that has no suitable WP, suggest creating one first.
Tier check (read axiom-config.md first): in simple tier, every project is 2-level — do not ask the depth question, do not mention 3-level structure, and manage numbering/IDs silently (apply them consistently; explain only when asked). In advanced tier, follow the depth rules below in full.
Hierarchy depth (advanced tier — read before any action)
Every project is either 2-level or 3-level (root CLAUDE.md, Hierarchy Protocol). The depth is chosen when the project is created and recorded in its registry as Levels: **2** or Levels: **3**.
| Depth | Chain | Sub-projects | Task ID |
| 2-level | Project → WP → Task | Not allowed | XX-WW-TT |
| 3-level | Project → Sub-project → WP → Task | Mandatory — every WP lives in one | XX-SS-WW-TT |
Before any action other than "new project": read vault/projects/<project>/ids.md, take Levels, and obey it.
The depth is locked. This skill never converts a project between 2 and 3 levels — that renumbers WPs and rewrites every task ID in the project. If the user asks for it, refuse and point to /setup new (Setup Protocol): the change is drafted as a setup file, executed once, and archived to setup/done/.
If action is empty
Describe this skill: its purpose and the actions table from "overview". Do not execute anything.
If action is "overview" (or unknown)
Show all options in tabular form:
| Argument | Action |
new project | Create a new project (all steps, including the depth choice in advanced tier) |
new subproject <project> | Create a sub-project under <project>. Advanced tier, 3-level projects only. No project named: ask which one |
new WP <project> - <subproject> | Create a work package inside the sub-project (3-level projects) |
new WP <project> | Create a work package directly under the project (2-level projects) |
overview | This table |
If the action was unknown, say so first, then show the table.
If action is "new project"
- Ask for anything missing: name and overall goals. Derive the kebab-case folder name (Latin alphabet only — transliterate other scripts) and confirm it if it differs from what the user typed.
- Depth. Simple tier: 2-level, silently. Advanced tier: ask for the hierarchy depth (2 or 3 levels) — show the table above and state plainly that the choice is fixed for the project's life and can only be changed later through a setup file. Do not default silently.
- Creation mode. Ask how the structure should be built (in simple tier use plain words: "build as we go" vs. "plan the full structure now from your deliverables"):
- Agile (default) — create the project shell now; sub-projects and WPs are added incrementally via
new subproject/new WPas the work unfolds. Continue with the steps below unchanged. - Predictive — plan the whole structure upfront from the deliverables. Interview for the work breakdown structure (WBS): the deliverables, their groupings, and known work items (accept a pasted WBS or build it through questions). Analyze it and map it to the hierarchy — 3-level: WBS branches → sub-projects, leaves → WPs; 2-level: leaves → WPs; flag WBS levels that don't fit the fixed depth and propose merges/splits. Present the full proposed tree with final names (kebab-case, acronym and number prefixes per the naming convention) and wait for approval. Then scaffold everything in one pass: all registry rows allocated in order, all folders, all vault mirror nodes (
goals.mdper unit,tasks.mdper WP — WP goals seeded from the WBS deliverable).
- Agile (default) — create the project shell now; sub-projects and WPs are added incrementally via
- Derive a project acronym (2 uppercase letters, per the Task ID Protocol). Confirm it with the user and check it is globally unique — scan every
vault/projects/*/ids.md(Acronym:line) and everyvault/workstations/*/areas.md(Acronym:line); projects and workstations share one namespace. The acronym must be globally unique so task IDs are unique and folder prefixes never collide. - Create
projects/<ACR>-<name>/— the confirmed acronym as an uppercase prefix, then the kebab-case name (e.g.PW-personal-website) — containing only:CLAUDE.md— sums up the rules for this project. Sections: Identity (what this project is, what routes here — state the depth here too), Goals (link to the vault goals page, no duplication), Structure (sub-projects and WPs as they are created), Workflow (project-specific rules).- No resources/ or outputs/ — those exist only in WPs.
Vault (mirrors the structure, same
ACR-prefix): createvault/projects/<ACR>-<name>/withgoals.md,status.md, andids.md. Frontmatter + [[wiki links]]. The registry shape follows the depth:2-level — one counter for WPs:
Acronym: **PW** Levels: **2** Next WP: **01** | WW | WP (folder) | Next task | Next output | | -- | ----------- | --------- | ----------- |3-level — a sub-project counter, plus one WP counter per sub-project:
Acronym: **PW** Levels: **3** Next sub-project: **01** | SS | Sub-project | Next WP | | -- | ----------- | ------- | | ID | WP (folder path) | Next task | Next output | | -- | ---------------- | --------- | ----------- |Next taskcounts task IDs (Task ID Protocol),Next outputthe running number in produced filenames (Output Hygiene & Naming). Both start at01/001in every new WP.- Add a routing map row to root CLAUDE.md (using the prefixed folder name).
- Suggest the next structural step — agile mode: a sub-project for 3-level projects, the first WP for 2-level ones (without a WP no work can be performed in this project); predictive mode: the structure already exists — point to the first WP to start working in instead.
- If the Todos module (M3) is active: offer a board/task setup for the project (
/todos board <name>in Notion mode) — offer only, never create it unasked. Best after the first WP exists.
If action is "new subproject <project>"
- Simple tier: explain that sub-projects belong to advanced mode and offer
/axiom tier advanced. Do not create anything. - If no project is named: list existing projects and ask which one. If the named project does not exist: ask (do not create it implicitly).
- Check the depth. Read
Levelsfromvault/projects/<project>/ids.md. If the project is 2-level, refuse: a 2-level project has no sub-projects. Offer the two legitimate paths — create a WP directly under the project, or convert the project to 3 levels via/setup new. Never create the sub-project anyway. - Ask for anything missing: sub-project name (kebab-case) and purpose.
- Allocate the sub-project number first (the folder is named after it): read
Next sub-projectfromids.md, use it as this sub-project'sSS, then add its row (number, name,Next WP: 01) and bumpNext sub-project(monotonic, never reused). - Create
projects/<project>/<SS>-<sub>/directly in the project (nosub-projects/wrapper) — pure structure, no CLAUDE.md, no resources/outputs. - Vault: create
vault/projects/<project>/<SS>-<sub>/withgoals.md. Update the project CLAUDE.md Structure section. - Suggest creating the first WP inside it.
If action is "new WP <project> - <subproject>" or "new WP <project>"
- Parse $ARGUMENTS and read
Levelsfromvault/projects/<project>/ids.md. Verify the parents exist; if not, ask instead of creating implicitly. Then check the form against the depth:- 3-level, no
- <subproject>given → refuse. Every WP must live in a sub-project. List the project's sub-projects and ask which one, or offernew subprojectfirst. - 2-level, a
- <subproject>given → refuse. A 2-level project has no sub-projects; the WP goes directly under the project.
- 3-level, no
- Ask for details: WP name (kebab-case) and purpose (one sentence minimum).
- Allocate the WP number first (the folder is named after it), from the counter that matches the depth (Task ID Protocol):
- 2-level: read
Next WPfromids.md, use it asWW, add the row (number, WP folder,Next task: 01,Next output: 001), bumpNext WP. - 3-level: read
Next WPfrom the owning sub-project's row, use it asWW, add the WP row (ID<SS>-<WW>, folder path,Next task: 01,Next output: 001), bump that sub-project'sNext WP. WP numbers restart at 01 in every sub-project, so they are unique only together withSS.
- 2-level: read
- Create
<WW>-<wp>/directly in the owning unit (nowork-packages/wrapper) withresources/andoutputs/— theWWprefix from step 3, two digits, then the kebab-case name (e.g.02-seo-optimization). The WP is the smallest unit and the only place work is performed. - Vault (mirrored node):
vault/projects/<project>/[<SS>-<sub>/]<WW>-<wp>/— same numbered folder — withgoals.md(the purpose) andtasks.md(open tasks). New task lines carry the full task ID (XX-WW-TTorXX-SS-WW-TT) and consume the WP'sNext taskcounter. - Update the project CLAUDE.md Structure section.
After any action
- Append to
vault/log.md, updatevault/index.md. - Report the created/changed structure as a tree.
Notes
- CLAUDE.md exists at project level only. Sub-projects and WPs are structure, not rule carriers.
- Never create resources/ or outputs/ outside a WP.
- Tasks have no folders: they live in the WP's
tasks.md. - The project folder itself carries the acronym prefix —
<ACR>-<name>, inprojects/and in the vault mirror. In the actions above,<project>therefore means the acronym-prefixed folder name. Only the name part may later be renamed — the acronym prefix is fixed for the project's life. - Sub-project folders carry the
SS-number prefix, WP folders theWW-prefix, both nested inside the acronym-prefixed project folder inprojects/and in the vault mirror. Only the name part may later be renamed — the prefixes are fixed for the unit's life, and a freed number is never reused. - In a 3-level project, WP numbers are not unique on their own (each sub-project restarts at 01). Always address a WP together with its sub-project — in this skill, in
/todos, and in conversation. - Work areas under
workstations/carry their ownAA-prefix and workstations their own acronym — different registry, see the/wsskill. - All created folder and file names follow the Latin-alphabet kebab-case convention (root CLAUDE.md, Output Hygiene & Naming); the uppercase acronym prefix is the one exception, alongside the numeric
SS-/WW-prefixes.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

