agentleFS
prospapledge88prospapledge88/claude-skills/skills/content/output-format-transformer/SKILL.md

output-format-transformer

Skill0 starsChanged 7 months agoNo licenceView on GitHub

Transform synthesised research findings into a specific deliverable format with structural completeness enforced. Use when the user has synthesis output, research findings, or structured analysis and needs it formatted as a particular deliverable type. Triggers include: "turn this into a skill spec", "format as a system prompt", "make this into a framework", "create an implementation plan from this", "transform these findings", "formalise this as", "convert synthesis to", "structure this as", deliverable, output format, reformat findings. Do NOT use for: performing synthesis or analysis itself (→ source-quality-assessor, evidence-convergence-mapper), creating skills from requirements or conversation (→ skill-writer), writing research prompts from scratch without existing findings (→ deep-research-prompt-writer), collaborative long-form writing from scratch (→ content-research-writer), editing existing deliverables, or planning multi-pass research pipelines (→ research-orchestrator).

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

22 rules. About 0 are common, 22 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • ≈0

    Common · estimate

    Many files like this have a rule of this kind.

  • ≈22

    Distinctive · estimate

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.

≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.