define-problem-statement
Skill777 starsChanged 10 months agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Creates a clear problem framing document with user impact, business context, and success criteria. Use when starting a new initiative, realigning a drifted project, or communicating up to leadership.
1 other project uses a version of this, 1 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- yuusakuri/agent-skillsedited, first seen Nov 1, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 1
- yuusakuri/agent-skills★ 2100% same
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository69 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- define-hypothesisSkill
- define-jtbd-canvasSkill
- define-opportunity-treeSkill
- define-prioritization-frameworkSkill
- deliver-acceptance-criteriaSkill
- deliver-edge-casesSkill
- deliver-launch-checklistSkill
- deliver-prdSkill
- deliver-release-notesSkill
- deliver-user-storiesSkill
- develop-adrSkill
- develop-design-rationaleSkill
- develop-solution-briefSkill
- develop-spike-summarySkill
- discover-competitive-analysisSkill
- discover-interview-synthesisSkill
- discover-journey-mapSkill
- discover-market-sizingSkill
- discover-stakeholder-summarySkill
- foundation-build-risk-reviewSkill
- foundation-lean-canvasSkill
- foundation-meeting-agendaSkill
- foundation-meeting-briefSkill
- foundation-meeting-recapSkill
- foundation-meeting-synthesizeSkill
- foundation-okr-writerSkill
- foundation-personaSkill
- foundation-prioritized-action-planSkill
- foundation-stakeholder-briefingsSkill
- foundation-stakeholder-updateSkill
- iterate-lessons-logSkill
- iterate-pivot-decisionSkill
- iterate-refinement-notesSkill
- iterate-retrospectiveSkill
- measure-dashboard-requirementsSkill
- measure-experiment-designSkill
- measure-experiment-resultsSkill
- measure-instrumentation-specSkill
- measure-okr-graderSkill
- measure-survey-analysisSkill
- tool-design-sprint-briefSkill
- tool-design-sprint-decide-and-storyboardSkill
- tool-design-sprint-map-and-targetSkill
- tool-design-sprint-prototype-planSkill
- tool-design-sprint-readinessSkill
- tool-design-sprint-sketchSkill
- tool-design-sprint-test-and-scoreSkill
- tool-foundation-sprint-approach-optionsSkill
- tool-foundation-sprint-basicsSkill
- tool-foundation-sprint-briefSkill
- tool-foundation-sprint-differentiationSkill
- tool-foundation-sprint-founding-hypothesisSkill
- tool-foundation-sprint-magic-lensesSkill
- tool-foundation-sprint-readinessSkill
- tool-note-and-voteSkill
- utility-mermaid-diagramsSkill
- utility-pm-changelog-curatorSkill
- utility-pm-criticSkill
- The first 60 shown.
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
4 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 35
When asked to create a problem statement, follow these steps:
- Distinctive: line 38
Ask who is experiencing this problem.
- Distinctive: line 53
Document what you don't know yet.
- Very specific: line 57
Use the template in references/TEMPLATE.md to structure the output.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
<!-- PM-Skills | https://github.com/product-on-purpose/pm-skills | Apache 2.0 -->Problem Statement
A problem statement is a concise document that frames the problem you're solving, articulates the impact on users and the business, and defines clear success criteria. It serves as the foundation for all subsequent product work by ensuring alignment on what problem to solve before jumping to how to solve it.
When to Use
- Starting a new initiative or project to establish shared understanding
- Realigning a drifted project back to its original intent
- Communicating up to leadership or stakeholders about priorities
- Evaluating whether a proposed solution actually addresses the core problem
- Onboarding new team members to provide context
When NOT to Use
- The problem is already agreed and engineering needs the spec -> use
deliver-prd - You want to propose and compare solution approaches -> use
develop-solution-brief - You are capturing customer motivation rather than a business problem -> use
define-jtbd-canvas - The "problem" is really an unvalidated assumption -> frame it with
define-hypothesisand test it before committing a team to it
Instructions
When asked to create a problem statement, follow these steps:
- Identify the User Segment Ask who is experiencing this problem. Get specific about the user persona, role, or segment. Avoid vague descriptions like "users" - instead target "mobile shoppers completing checkout" or "enterprise admins managing 50+ users."
- Understand the Pain Points Explore what friction, frustration, or unmet need the user experiences. Ask probing questions to understand the severity and frequency of the problem. Look for evidence from user research, support tickets, or behavioral data.
- Establish Business Context Connect the user problem to business impact. How does this problem affect revenue, retention, growth, or strategic goals? Why should the organization invest in solving this now versus later?
- Define Success Metrics Identify how you will measure success. What metrics will move if this problem is solved? Establish current baselines and target improvements. Be specific and time-bound.
- Surface Constraints and Considerations Note any technical limitations, resource constraints, regulatory requirements, or dependencies that will shape the solution space.
- Capture Open Questions Document what you don't know yet. What assumptions need validation? What additional research is needed?
Output Format
Use the template in references/TEMPLATE.md to structure the output. A complete problem statement fills every template section: Problem Summary; User Impact; Business Context; Success Criteria; Constraints & Considerations; and Open Questions.
Quality Checklist
Before finalizing, verify:
- Problem is specific to a defined user segment (not "all users")
- Impact is quantified with data or reasonable estimates
- Success metrics have baselines and targets
- Problem describes the "what" without prescribing the "how"
- Business context explains why this matters now
- Open questions are captured for follow-up
Examples
See references/EXAMPLE.md for a completed example.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

