zephyr-explore
Skill5 starsChanged 44 days agoMITView on GitHub
Use when Zephyr source, branch history, external precedent, or design constraints must be investigated before a decision can be made.
In this repository7 other files it gives its agents.
- de-ai-writingSkill
- docs-translate-zhSkill
- interactive-gdb-debuggingSkill
- openeuler-researchSkill
- zephyr-debugSkill
- zephyr-patch-reviewSkill
- zephyr-safety-evidenceSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 26
Put every generated intermediate debugging document, debug script, and scaffolding or harness script, including Bash and Python scripts, …
- Very specific: line 45
Search current source, tests, documentation, and MAINTAINERS.yml before using history or external material.
- Distinctive: line 50
Use local history when current source does not explain intent or a compatibility constraint.
- Distinctive: line 53
Stop when the evidence supports the next design, review, or verification decision.
- Distinctive: line 60
Treat external code as precedent unless import is explicitly in scope and license-compatible.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Zephyr Explore
Audit workflow
For every non-trivial task that writes to the workspace, choose a stable task slug and keep agent-only records under:
.zephyr-skills/<agent-task>/
├── audit.md # Baseline, decisions, evidence, verification, and gaps
├── commands.md # Redacted commands, working directories, and results
├── scripts/ # Intermediate debug documents, scripts, and harnesses
├── output/ # Non-Zephyr dependencies and temporary binaries
└── logs/ # Decisive build, test, runtime, or diagnostic logsPut every generated intermediate debugging document, debug script, and
scaffolding or harness script, including Bash and Python scripts, under
scripts/, never in a build directory. Put non-Zephyr third-party source or
libraries acquired solely for the agent's task, and temporary binaries produced
by agent-only probes or tools, under output/. Do not copy normal Zephyr build
artifacts there. Keep other agent plans and temporary evidence in the same task
directory. In a Git worktree, add
/.zephyr-skills/ to the repository-local exclude file returned by
git rev-parse --git-path info/exclude before writing audit artifacts. Preserve
existing entries, avoid duplicates, and verify before handoff that
git status --short contains no .zephyr-skills/ paths. Keep Zephyr-native
build trees, binaries, and test outputs separate: honor a user-specified path,
otherwise use defaults such as configured build.dir-fmt, build/, or
twister-out/. Record the effective paths, do not stage .zephyr-skills/
unless requested, and report the task directory and unresolved gaps at handoff.
Investigate
- Bound the question to paths, symbols, configuration, and behavior.
- Search current source, tests, documentation, and
MAINTAINERS.ymlbefore using history or external material. - For branch comparisons, use the user-specified target. Otherwise resolve the
configured upstream and use
git merge-base HEAD <upstream>; report a missing target or upstream instead of guessing. - Use local history when current source does not explain intent or a compatibility constraint.
- Consult primary external sources only when local evidence is insufficient.
- Stop when the evidence supports the next design, review, or verification decision.
Report
- Separate implemented, verified, documented, inferred, and unknown behavior.
- Cite decisive paths, symbols, commits, or external revisions.
- Treat external code as precedent unless import is explicitly in scope and license-compatible.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

