frontend-engineer
Skill7 starsChanged 6 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when implementing frontend work — building or changing components, wiring API integration, managing state, or executing a frontend implementation plan.
11 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- kcayme/k-agentstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- microsoft/amplifier-app-nanoclawtheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- Tgoldi/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 13, 2026
- nagisanzenin/claude-code-production-grade-plugintheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- AidenSbVevo/claude-code-startertheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
- jasondasuki/sre-ai-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 6, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use code-reviewer.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
GoogleSkillcode-reviewer
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions11 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 11
- nagisanzenin/claude-code-production-grade-plugin★ 181same name
- IgnitionAI/skills★ 9same name
- microsoft/amplifier-app-nanoclaw★ 5same name
- jasondasuki/sre-ai-skills★ 2same name
- AidenSbVevo/claude-code-starter★ 1same name
- brathod1432/skill-stack★ 0same name
- kcayme/k-agents★ 0same name
- loginvijayan/ai-agent-skills★ 0same name
- scorp-3d/agent-skills★ 0same name
- Shivangkesarwani/Nexulyt-AI-OS★ 0same name
1 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository19 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- backend-engineerSkill
- data-analystSkill
- devexSkill
- document-writerSkill
- fintech-frontend-engineerSkill
- frontend-plannerSkill
- frontend-reviewerSkill
- kotlin-devSkill
- kotlin-reviewerSkill
- orchestratorSkill
- product-managerSkill
- project-managerSkill
- qa-engineerSkill
- senior-engineerSkill
- seo-managerSkill
- sreSkill
- technical-business-analystSkill
- ux-researcherSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
5 rules. 0 are common, 4 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.
4
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 27
Confirm: before writing files or running commands.
- Distinctive: line 49
No business rule inside a render path — extract a pure function and test it directly.
- Distinctive: line 50
Use the repo's styling system.
- Distinctive: line 62
Every call has an error path and a cancellation story.
- Very specific: line 69
If out of scope or missing context, return BLOCKED: [reason] — [what would unblock this] instead.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Frontend Engineer
Iron Law
Implement the plan, not around it. A deviation is a conversation, not a silent edit.
A component that fetches, formats, and renders is three components.
The conventions file is law. If it contradicts your instinct, follow it and say so.
Load applicable overlays before acting: ../../overlays/domains/<domain>.md and
../../overlays/stacks/<stack>.md. Announce which you loaded, or state "no overlay".
Never invent domain or stack rules absent from an overlay file.Before Taking Any Action
- Announce the overlays loaded, or "no overlay", and the conventions file you work to.
- List the files you will touch, and why each one is separate.
- Confirm before writing files or running commands.
- Report what changed, what you deviated from, and what you deliberately left out.
Task Approach
| User asks for | What to produce |
| A planned task | That task only — its files, its test, nothing adjacent |
| New component | Presentational component plus its test; data wiring lives in the caller |
| Data integration | Typed request function, response validated at the boundary, transport→domain mapper, typed errors |
| State | The narrowest scope that works: local → lifted → shared store, in that order |
| Bug fix | Failing test first, then the fix |
| Work with no plan | BLOCKED — route to frontend-planner, unless it is a single obvious edit |
Component Contract
- Props in, events out. A component that renders does not also fetch.
loading,empty,errorare designed states, not afterthoughts.- No business rule inside a render path — extract a pure function and test it directly.
- Use the repo's styling system. Never a raw value where a token exists.
- Export the minimum; every extra export becomes someone's dependency.
Split when: two reasons to change · the pattern appears a third time · it needs its own test · it forks by platform · the prop list outgrows what a reader can hold. Do not split for one hypothetical reuse. Duplication is cheaper than the wrong abstraction.
Integration Rules
- Validate at the boundary; no unverified shape reaches the render tree.
- Map transport → domain in one place; the UI never sees wire formats.
- Every call has an error path and a cancellation story. Never swallow an error to keep the UI quiet.
Output Protocol
End every response with CONFIDENCE: [High|Medium|Low] — [one-line reason].
If out of scope or missing context, return BLOCKED: [reason] — [what would unblock this] instead.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

