acceptance-criteria
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Defines the content and structure of a Slice's Acceptance Criteria. Reference when assembling or reviewing slices/<id>/acceptance-criteria.json.
16 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- celestialdust/achilles-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- MiguelSavignano/claude-code-systemtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Happy-Technologies-LLC/happy-platform-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- Tngc93/product-management-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- Sunnyshinnny776/pm-agentic-cookbooktheir own version, first seen Oct 20, 2026
- garthcodes/claude-skillstheir own version, first seen Oct 8, 2026
Other versions16 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 16
- Happy-Technologies-LLC/happy-platform-skills★ 41same name
- jdm4pku/RE-Skills★ 26same name
- MiguelSavignano/claude-code-system★ 6same name
- HamzaSheikh768/Agents-Skills-Lap★ 3same name
- designedbythanh/ai-skills-library-product-design★ 2same name
- garthcodes/claude-skills★ 2same name
- smarzban/agent-sdlc★ 2same name
- Sunnyshinnny776/pm-agentic-cookbook★ 2same name
- celestialdust/achilles-skills★ 1same name
- dhslegen/digital-delivery-team★ 1same name
6 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository17 other files it gives its agents.
- adjudication-recordSkill
- adrSkill
- behavior-inventorySkill
- characterization-suiteSkill
- context-modelSkill
- contract-testsSkill
- cutover-planSkill
- design-docSkill
- divergence-registerSkill
- interface-inventorySkill
- migration-waypointsSkill
- observability-specSkill
- retirement-registerSkill
- roadmapSkill
- slice-outlineSkill
- tactical-modelSkill
- variation-policySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
1 rule. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 12 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 28
If a criterion's exact boundary is still under discussion, write it as precisely as currently possible and flag the open question in the …
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 12 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Acceptance Criteria
Defines what an Acceptance Criterion record contains. In v1 (characterization oracle), acceptance criteria restate what the characterization suite must prove; under a future specification oracle (seam S1.1) they would instead carry the scope directly.
Schema
schemas/acceptance-criteria.schema.json. One JSON object per criterion; slices/<id>/acceptance-criteria.json is a JSON array of these.
Required fields
id (AC-NNNN), slice (SLC-NNNN), statement (≥10 characters — a real assertion, not a restated Behavior summary), behaviors.
Content obligations
Every Slice needs at least one Acceptance Criterion, and every criterion should cite the Behavior(s) it proves — in v1 behaviors[] should be non-empty for every criterion, since there is no other oracle yet to carry the scope. Set failure_path: true for criteria specifically about failure, timeout, or partial-completion behavior, and make sure such criteria actually exist — a Slice whose acceptance criteria are all happy-path is under-specified before a single test is written.
Behavior-ID citation
behaviors[] is the citation. A criterion with an empty behaviors[] under oracle_strategy: "characterization" has nothing anchoring it to observed system behavior — it is closer to a wish than a criterion.
Unknowns
If a criterion's exact boundary is still under discussion, write it as precisely as currently possible and flag the open question in the accompanying PRD — do not leave the statement vague to avoid committing.
Minimal worked example
{
"id": "AC-0009",
"slice": "SLC-0004",
"statement": "An order placement request with quantity <= 0 is rejected with the same error code and message the legacy system returns",
"behaviors": ["BHV-0042"],
"failure_path": true
}Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

