creating-skills
Skill124 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Use when creating new Claude Code skills or improving existing ones - ensures skills are discoverable, scannable, and effective through proper structure, CSO optimization, and real examples
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
16 rules. 0 are common, 14 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 27 edited versions we read keep these.
14
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Core principle: Default assumption is Claude is already very smart.
- Very specific: line 42
Only name and description fields supported (max 1024 chars total)
- Distinctive: line 44
Avoid reserved words: "anthropic", "claude" in names
- Distinctive: line 80
Use broad guidance, principles, examples
- Distinctive: line 89
Red flag: If skill tries to constrain Claude too much on creative tasks, reduce specificity.
- Distinctive: line 113
Use words Claude would search for:
- Distinctive: line 214
When: All content fits in ~500 words, no heavy reference needed
- Very specific: line 246
SKILL.md: Keep under 500 lines
- Distinctive: line 273
Use progressive disclosure (reference additional files as needed)
- Distinctive: line 354
Start with minimal viable skill
- Distinctive: line 355
Test with real use cases
- Distinctive: line 357
Remove what doesn't add value
- Distinctive: line 402
When skills produce consistent formats:
- Distinctive: line 470
Flat namespace: - all skills in one searchable directory
- Distinctive: line 485
Leave gaps in understanding (no examples)
- Distinctive: line 494
Golden rule: Default assumption is Claude is already very smart.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 27 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Creating Skills
Overview
Skills are reference guides for proven techniques, patterns, or tools. Write them to help future Claude instances quickly find and apply effective approaches.
Skills must be discoverable (Claude can find them), scannable (quick to evaluate), and actionable (clear examples).
Core principle: Default assumption is Claude is already very smart. Only add context Claude doesn't already have.
When to Use
Create a skill when:
- Technique wasn't intuitively obvious
- Pattern applies broadly across projects
- You'd reference this again
- Others would benefit
Don't create for:
- One-off solutions specific to single project
- Standard practices well-documented elsewhere
- Project conventions (put those in
.claude/CLAUDE.md)
Required Structure
Frontmatter (YAML)
---
name: skill-name-with-hyphens
description: Use when [triggers/symptoms] - [what it does and how it helps]
tags: relevant-tags
---Rules:
- Only
nameanddescriptionfields supported (max 1024 chars total) - Name: letters, numbers, hyphens only (max 64 chars). Use gerund form (verb + -ing)
- Avoid reserved words: "anthropic", "claude" in names
- Description: Third person, starts with "Use when..." (max 1024 chars)
- Include BOTH triggering conditions AND what skill does
- Match specificity to task complexity (degrees of freedom)
Document Structure
# Skill Name
## Overview
Core principle in 1-2 sentences. What is this?
## When to Use
- Bullet list with symptoms and use cases
- When NOT to use
## Quick Reference
Table or bullets for common operations
## Implementation
Inline code for simple patterns
Link to separate file for heavy reference (100+ lines)
## Common Mistakes
What goes wrong + how to fix
## Real-World Impact (optional)
Concrete results from using this techniqueDegrees of Freedom
Match specificity to task complexity:
- High freedom: Flexible tasks requiring judgment
- Use broad guidance, principles, examples
- Let Claude adapt approach to context
- Example: "Use when designing APIs - provides REST principles and patterns"
- Low freedom: Fragile or critical operations
- Be explicit about exact steps
- Include validation checks
- Example: "Use when deploying to production - follow exact deployment checklist with rollback procedures"
Red flag: If skill tries to constrain Claude too much on creative tasks, reduce specificity. If skill is too vague on critical operations, add explicit steps.
Claude Search Optimization (CSO)
Critical: Future Claude reads the description to decide if skill is relevant. Optimize for discovery.
Description Best Practices
# ❌ BAD - Too vague, doesn't mention when to use
description: For async testing
# ❌ BAD - First person (injected into system prompt)
description: I help you with flaky tests
# ✅ GOOD - Triggers + what it does
description: Use when tests have race conditions or pass/fail inconsistently - replaces arbitrary timeouts with condition polling for reliable async tests
# ✅ GOOD - Technology-specific with explicit trigger
description: Use when using React Router and handling auth redirects - provides patterns for protected routes and auth state managementKeyword Coverage
Use words Claude would search for:
- Error messages: "ENOENT", "Cannot read property", "Timeout"
- Symptoms: "flaky", "hanging", "race condition", "memory leak"
- Synonyms: "cleanup/teardown/afterEach", "timeout/hang/freeze"
- Tools: Actual command names, library names, file types
Naming Conventions
Use gerund form (verb + -ing):
- ✅
creating-skillsnotskill-creation - ✅
testing-with-subagentsnotsubagent-testing - ✅
debugging-memory-leaksnotmemory-leak-debugging - ✅
processing-pdfsnotpdf-processor - ✅
analyzing-spreadsheetsnotspreadsheet-analysis
Why gerunds work:
- Describes the action you're taking
- Active and clear
- Consistent with Anthropic conventions
Avoid:
- ❌ Vague names like "Helper" or "Utils"
- ❌ Passive voice constructions
Code Examples
One excellent example beats many mediocre ones.
Choose Language by Use Case
- Testing techniques → TypeScript/JavaScript
- System debugging → Shell/Python
- Data processing → Python
- API calls → TypeScript/JavaScript
Good Example Checklist
- Complete and runnable
- Well-commented explaining WHY not just what
- From real scenario (not contrived)
- Shows pattern clearly
- Ready to adapt (not generic template)
- Shows both BAD (❌) and GOOD (✅) approaches
- Includes realistic context/setup code
Example Template
// ✅ GOOD - Clear, complete, ready to adapt
interface RetryOptions {
maxAttempts: number;
delayMs: number;
backoff?: 'linear' | 'exponential';
}
async function retryOperation<T>(
operation: () => Promise<T>,
options: RetryOptions
): Promise<T> {
const { maxAttempts, delayMs, backoff = 'linear' } = options;
for (let attempt = 1; attempt <= maxAttempts; attempt++) {
try {
return await operation();
} catch (error) {
if (attempt === maxAttempts) throw error;
const delay = backoff === 'exponential'
? delayMs * Math.pow(2, attempt - 1)
: delayMs * attempt;
await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, delay));
}
}
throw new Error('Unreachable');
}
// Usage
const data = await retryOperation(
() => fetchUserData(userId),
{ maxAttempts: 3, delayMs: 1000, backoff: 'exponential' }
);Don't
- ❌ Implement in 5+ languages (you're good at porting)
- ❌ Create fill-in-the-blank templates
- ❌ Write contrived examples
- ❌ Show only code without comments
File Organization
Self-Contained (Preferred)
typescript-type-safety/
SKILL.md # Everything inlineWhen: All content fits in ~500 words, no heavy reference needed
With Supporting Files
api-integration/
SKILL.md # Overview + patterns
retry-helpers.ts # Reusable code
examples/
auth-example.ts
pagination-example.tsWhen: Reusable tools or multiple complete examples needed
With Heavy Reference
aws-sdk/
SKILL.md # Overview + workflows
s3-api.md # 600 lines API reference
lambda-api.md # 500 lines API referenceWhen: Reference material > 100 lines
Token Efficiency
Skills load into every conversation. Keep them concise.
Target Limits
- SKILL.md: Keep under 500 lines
- Getting-started workflows: <150 words
- Frequently-loaded skills: <200 words total
- Other skills: <500 words
- Files > 100 lines: Include table of contents
Challenge each piece of information: "Does Claude really need this explanation?"
Compression Techniques
# ❌ BAD - Verbose (42 words)
Your human partner asks: "How did we handle authentication errors in React Router before?"
You should respond: "I'll search past conversations for React Router authentication patterns."
Then dispatch a subagent with the search query: "React Router authentication error handling 401"
# ✅ GOOD - Concise (20 words)
Partner: "How did we handle auth errors in React Router?"
You: Searching...
[Dispatch subagent → synthesis]Techniques:
- Reference tool
--helpinstead of documenting all flags - Cross-reference other skills instead of repeating content
- Show minimal example of pattern
- Eliminate redundancy
- Use progressive disclosure (reference additional files as needed)
- Organize content by domain for focused context
Workflow Recommendations
For multi-step processes, include:
- Clear sequential steps: Break complex tasks into numbered operations
- Feedback loops: Build in verification/validation steps
- Error handling: What to check when things go wrong
- Checklists: For processes with many steps or easy-to-miss details
Example structure:
## Workflow
1. **Preparation**
- Check prerequisites
- Validate environment
2. **Execution**
- Step 1: [action + expected result]
- Step 2: [action + expected result]
3. **Verification**
- [ ] Check 1 passes
- [ ] Check 2 passes
4. **Rollback** (if needed)
- Steps to undo changesCommon Mistakes
| Mistake | Why It Fails | Fix |
| Narrative example | "In session 2025-10-03..." | Focus on reusable pattern |
| Multi-language dilution | Same example in 5 languages | One excellent example |
| Code in flowcharts | step1 [label="import fs"] | Use markdown code blocks |
| Generic labels | helper1, helper2, step3 | Use semantic names |
| Missing description triggers | "For testing" | "Use when tests are flaky..." |
| First-person description | "I help you..." | "Use when... - provides..." |
| Deeply nested file references | Multiple @ symbols, complex paths | Keep references simple and direct |
| Windows-style file paths | C:\path\to\file | Use forward slashes |
| Offering too many options | 10 different approaches | Focus on one proven approach |
| Punting error handling | "Claude figures it out" | Include explicit error handling in scripts |
| Time-sensitive information | "As of 2025..." | Keep content evergreen |
| Inconsistent terminology | Mixing synonyms randomly | Use consistent terms throughout |
Flowchart Usage
Only use flowcharts for:
- Non-obvious decision points
- Process loops where you might stop too early
- "When to use A vs B" decisions
Never use for:
- Reference material → Use tables/lists
- Code examples → Use markdown blocks
- Linear instructions → Use numbered lists
Cross-Referencing Skills
# ✅ GOOD - Name only with clear requirement
**REQUIRED:** Use superpowers:test-driven-development before proceeding
**RECOMMENDED:** See typescript-type-safety for proper type guards
# ❌ BAD - Unclear if required
See skills/testing/test-driven-development
# ❌ BAD - Force-loads file, wastes context
@skills/testing/test-driven-development/SKILL.mdAdvanced Practices
Iterative Development
Best approach: Develop skills iteratively with Claude
- Start with minimal viable skill
- Test with real use cases
- Refine based on what works
- Remove what doesn't add value
Build Evaluations First
Before extensive documentation:
- Create test scenarios
- Identify what good looks like
- Document proven patterns
- Skip theoretical improvements
Utility Scripts
For reliability, provide:
- Scripts with explicit error handling (don't defer errors to Claude)
- Exit codes for success/failure
- Clear error messages
- Examples of usage
- List required dependencies explicitly
Example:
#!/bin/bash
set -e # Exit on error
if [ ! -f "config.json" ]; then
echo "Error: config.json not found" >&2
exit 1
fi
# Script logic here
echo "Success"
exit 0Verifiable Intermediate Outputs
For complex operations, create validation checkpoints:
- Have Claude produce a structured plan file
- Validate the plan with a script
- Execute only after validation passes
This catches errors before they compound.
Templates for Structured Output
When skills produce consistent formats:
## Output Template
\`\`\`typescript
interface ExpectedOutput {
status: 'success' | 'error';
data: YourDataType;
errors?: string[];
}
\`\`\`
**Usage**: Copy and adapt for your contextSkill Creation Checklist
Before writing:
- Technique isn't obvious or well-documented elsewhere
- Pattern applies broadly (not project-specific)
- I would reference this across multiple projects
Frontmatter:
- Name uses only letters, numbers, hyphens
- Description starts with "Use when..."
- Description includes triggers AND what skill does
- Description is third person
- Total frontmatter < 1024 characters
Content:
- Overview states core principle (1-2 sentences)
- "When to Use" section with symptoms
- Quick reference table for common operations
- One excellent code example (if technique skill)
- Common mistakes section
- Keywords throughout for searchability
Quality:
- Word count appropriate for frequency (see targets above)
- SKILL.md under 500 lines
- No narrative storytelling
- Flowcharts only for non-obvious decisions
- Supporting files only if needed (100+ lines reference)
- Cross-references use skill name, not file paths
- No time-sensitive information
- Consistent terminology throughout
- Concrete examples (not templates)
- Degrees of freedom match task complexity
Testing:
- Tested with Claude Haiku, Sonnet, and Opus (instructions effective for Opus may need more detail for Haiku)
- Tested with subagent scenarios (if discipline-enforcing skill)
- Addresses common rationalizations
- Includes red flags list
Directory Structure
skills/
skill-name/
SKILL.md # Required
supporting-file.* # Optional
examples/ # Optional
example1.ts
scripts/ # Optional
helper.pyFlat namespace - all skills in one searchable directory
Real-World Impact
Good skills:
- Future Claude finds them quickly (CSO optimization)
- Can be scanned in seconds (quick reference)
- Provide clear actionable examples
- Prevent repeating same research
- Stay under 500 lines (token efficient)
- Match specificity to task needs (right degrees of freedom)
Bad skills:
- Get ignored (vague description)
- Take too long to evaluate (no quick reference)
- Leave gaps in understanding (no examples)
- Waste token budget (verbose explanations of obvious things)
- Over-constrain creative tasks or under-specify critical operations
- Include time-sensitive or obsolete information
Remember: Skills are for future Claude, not current you. Optimize for discovery, scanning, and action.
Golden rule: Default assumption is Claude is already very smart. Only add context Claude doesn't already have.
Other versions29 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- NangoHQ/nango★ 13k89% same
- AgentWorkforce/relay★ 1.1k100% same
Wrote their own version · 27
- microsoft/FluidFramework★ 5ksame name
- dotnet/fsharp★ 4.3ksame name
- microsoft/vstest★ 977same name
- redai-infra/Relax★ 647same name
- jaktestowac/awesome-copilot-for-testers★ 118same name
- microsoft/upgrade-agent-plugins★ 44same name
- myths-labs/muse★ 37same name
- mjunaidca/mjs-agent-skills★ 27same name
- osmontero/opencode-skills★ 15same name
- AbdullahMalik17/Digital-FTE★ 12same name
17 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
Used alongsideProjects with it also use building-chatgpt-apps, building-chat-interfaces and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
mjunaidcaSkillbuilding-chatgpt-apps
Guides creation of ChatGPT Apps with interactive widgets using OpenAI Apps SDK and MCP servers. Use when building ChatGPT custom apps with visual UI components, embedded widgets, or rich interactive experiences. Covers widget architecture, MCP server setup with FastMCP, response metadata, and Developer Mode configuration. NOT when building standard MCP servers without widgets (use building-mcp-servers skill instead).
Also in 4 projects that use this
mjunaidcaSkillbuilding-chat-interfaces
Build AI chat interfaces with custom backends, authentication, and context injection. Use when integrating chat UI with AI agents, adding auth to chat, injecting user/page context, or implementing httpOnly cookie proxies. Covers ChatKitServer, useChatKit, and MCP auth patterns. NOT when building simple chatbots without persistence or custom agent integration.
Also in 4 projects that use this
- +10 more from mjunaidca
In this repository64 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- beanstalk-deployCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/core-principles.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/creating-agents-md.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/creating-claude-agents.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/creating-claude-commands.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/creating-claude-hooks.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/creating-continue-packages.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/creating-copilot-packages.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/creating-cursor-commands.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/creating-cursor-rules.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/creating-kiro-agents.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/creating-kiro-packages.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/creating-skills.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/creating-windsurf-packages.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/elastic-beanstalk-deployment.mdCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/format-conversion.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/github-actions-testing.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/karen-repo-reviewer.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/prpm-json-best-practices.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/self-improve-cursor.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/testing-patterns.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript-type-safety.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/typescript-type-specialist.mdcCursor rule
- creating-agent-skillsSkill
- adding-new-ai-formatSkill
- agent-builderSkill
- aws-beanstalk-expertSkill
- beanstalk-deploySkill
- claude-hook-writerSkill
- creating-agents-mdSkill
- creating-claude-agentsSkill
- creating-claude-commandsSkill
- creating-claude-hooksSkill
- creating-claude-rulesSkill
- creating-continue-packagesSkill
- creating-copilot-packagesSkill
- creating-cursor-commandsSkill
- creating-cursor-rules-skillSkill
- creating-kiro-agentsSkill
- creating-kiro-packagesSkill
- creating-opencode-agentsSkill
- creating-opencode-pluginsSkill
- creating-windsurf-packagesSkill
- creating-zed-extensionsSkill
- documentation-standardsSkill
- elastic-beanstalk-deploymentSkill
- github-actions-testingSkill
- human-writingSkill
- integrating-stripe-webhooksSkill
- karen-repo-reviewerSkill
- npm-trusted-publishingSkill
- osgrepSkill
- postgres-migrationsSkill
- prpm-developmentSkill
- prpm-json-best-practicesSkill
- pulumi-troubleshootingSkill
- self-improvingSkill
- slash-command-builderSkill
- The first 60 shown.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

