agentleFS
ppswdevppswdev/pp_skills/skills/00_base/finishing-a-development-branch/SKILL.md

finishing-a-development-branch

Skill0 starsChanged 5 days agoMITView on GitHub

Use when implementation is complete, all tests pass, and you need to decide how to integrate the work - guides completion of development work by presenting structured options for merge, PR, or cleanup

  • Commits and pushes

193 other projects use a version of this, 152 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use chinese-code-review, chinese-commit-conventions and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • Leodorareluctant259Skill

    chinese-code-review

    中文代码审查规范——在保持专业严谨的同时,用符合国内团队文化的方式给出有效反馈

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • Leodorareluctant259Skill

    chinese-commit-conventions

    中文 Git 提交规范 — 适配国内团队的 commit message 规范和 changelog 自动化

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • obraSkill

    diagnosing-superpowers

    Use when a superpowers session went wrong and your human partner wants to know why — repeated work, ignored plans, stumbles, poor results, a skill that didn't fire, "it took too long", "why is it so expensive", "what is it doing" — or wants to build a bug report for the superpowers maintainers, for the current session or a past one identified by id or path, on any harness.

    Also in 20 projects that use this

  • kntismSkill

    condition-based-waiting

    Use when tests have race conditions, timing dependencies, or inconsistent pass/fail behavior - replaces arbitrary timeouts with condition polling to wait for actual state changes, eliminating flaky tests from timing guesses

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    testing-anti-patterns

    Use when writing or changing tests, adding mocks, or tempted to add test-only methods to production code - prevents testing mock behavior, production pollution with test-only methods, and mocking without understanding dependencies

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    root-cause-tracing

    Use when errors occur deep in execution and you need to trace back to find the original trigger - systematically traces bugs backward through call stack, adding instrumentation when needed, to identify source of invalid data or incorrect behavior

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • +3 more from Leodorareluctant259

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

14 rules. 1 is common, 11 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 1

    Common

    Most of the 165 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 11

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Common:

    Core principle: Verify tests → Detect environment → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.

    line 12
  2. Distinctive:

    Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.

    line 36
  3. Distinctive:

    Don't add explanation: - keep options concise.

    line 93
  4. Distinctive:

    Wait for exact confirmation.

    line 158
  5. Distinctive:

    Fix: Always verify tests before offering options

    line 207
  6. Distinctive:

    Problem: Remove worktree user needs for PR iteration

    line 214
  7. Distinctive:

    Fix: Only cleanup for Options 1 and 4

    line 215
  8. Very specific:

    Fix: Always cd to main repo root before git worktree remove

    line 223
  9. Very specific:

    Fix: Only clean up worktrees under .worktrees/, worktrees/, or ~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/

    line 227
  10. Distinctive:

    Delete work without confirmation

    line 238
  11. Distinctive:

    Remove a worktree before confirming merge success

    line 240
  12. Distinctive:

    Run git worktree remove from inside the worktree

    line 242
  13. Distinctive:

    Verify tests before offering options

    line 245
  14. Distinctive:

    Run git worktree prune after removal

    line 251

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 165 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Finishing a Development Branch

Overview

Guide completion of development work by presenting clear options and handling chosen workflow.

Core principle: Verify tests → Detect environment → Present options → Execute choice → Clean up.

Announce at start: "I'm using the finishing-a-development-branch skill to complete this work."

The Process

Step 1: Verify Tests

Before presenting options, verify tests pass:

# Run project's test suite
npm test / cargo test / pytest / go test ./...

If tests fail:

Tests failing (<N> failures). Must fix before completing:

[Show failures]

Cannot proceed with merge/PR until tests pass.

Stop. Don't proceed to Step 2.

If tests pass: Continue to Step 2.

Step 2: Detect Environment

Determine workspace state before presenting options:

GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)

This determines which menu to show and how cleanup works:

StateMenuCleanup
GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON (normal repo)Standard 4 optionsNo worktree to clean up
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, named branchStandard 4 optionsProvenance-based (see Step 6)
GIT_DIR != GIT_COMMON, detached HEADReduced 3 options (no merge)No cleanup (externally managed)

Step 3: Determine Base Branch

# Try common base branches
git merge-base HEAD main 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD master 2>/dev/null

Or ask: "This branch split from main - is that correct?"

Step 4: Present Options

Normal repo and named-branch worktree — present exactly these 4 options:

Implementation complete. What would you like to do?

1. Merge back to <base-branch> locally
2. Push and create a Pull Request
3. Keep the branch as-is (I'll handle it later)
4. Discard this work

Which option?

Detached HEAD — present exactly these 3 options:

Implementation complete. You're on a detached HEAD (externally managed workspace).

1. Push as new branch and create a Pull Request
2. Keep as-is (I'll handle it later)
3. Discard this work

Which option?

Don't add explanation - keep options concise.

Step 5: Execute Choice

Option 1: Merge Locally

# Get main repo root for CWD safety
MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"

# Merge first — verify success before removing anything
git checkout <base-branch>
git pull
git merge <feature-branch>

# Verify tests on merged result
<test command>

# Only after merge succeeds: cleanup worktree (Step 6), then delete branch

Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 6), then delete branch:

git branch -d <feature-branch>

Option 2: Push and Create PR

# Push branch
git push -u origin <feature-branch>

# Create PR
gh pr create --title "<title>" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Summary
<2-3 bullets of what changed>

## Test Plan
- [ ] <verification steps>
EOF
)"

Do NOT clean up worktree — user needs it alive to iterate on PR feedback.

Option 3: Keep As-Is

Report: "Keeping branch <name>. Worktree preserved at <path>."

Don't cleanup worktree.

Option 4: Discard

Confirm first:

This will permanently delete:
- Branch <name>
- All commits: <commit-list>
- Worktree at <path>

Type 'discard' to confirm.

Wait for exact confirmation.

If confirmed:

MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"

Then: Cleanup worktree (Step 6), then force-delete branch:

git branch -D <feature-branch>

Step 6: Cleanup Workspace

Only runs for Options 1 and 4. Options 2 and 3 always preserve the worktree.

GIT_DIR=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
GIT_COMMON=$(cd "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)" 2>/dev/null && pwd -P)
WORKTREE_PATH=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)

If GIT_DIR == GIT_COMMON: Normal repo, no worktree to clean up. Done.

If worktree path is under .worktrees/, worktrees/, or ~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/: Superpowers created this worktree — we own cleanup.

MAIN_ROOT=$(git -C "$(git rev-parse --git-common-dir)/.." rev-parse --show-toplevel)
cd "$MAIN_ROOT"
git worktree remove "$WORKTREE_PATH"
git worktree prune  # Self-healing: clean up any stale registrations

Otherwise: The host environment (harness) owns this workspace. Do NOT remove it. If your platform provides a workspace-exit tool, use it. Otherwise, leave the workspace in place.

Quick Reference

OptionMergePushKeep WorktreeCleanup Branch
1. Merge locallyyes--yes
2. Create PR-yesyes-
3. Keep as-is--yes-
4. Discard---yes (force)

Common Mistakes

Skipping test verification

  • Problem: Merge broken code, create failing PR
  • Fix: Always verify tests before offering options

Open-ended questions

  • Problem: "What should I do next?" is ambiguous
  • Fix: Present exactly 4 structured options (or 3 for detached HEAD)

Cleaning up worktree for Option 2

  • Problem: Remove worktree user needs for PR iteration
  • Fix: Only cleanup for Options 1 and 4

Deleting branch before removing worktree

  • Problem: git branch -d fails because worktree still references the branch
  • Fix: Merge first, remove worktree, then delete branch

Running git worktree remove from inside the worktree

  • Problem: Command fails silently when CWD is inside the worktree being removed
  • Fix: Always cd to main repo root before git worktree remove

Cleaning up harness-owned worktrees

  • Problem: Removing a worktree the harness created causes phantom state
  • Fix: Only clean up worktrees under .worktrees/, worktrees/, or ~/.config/superpowers/worktrees/

No confirmation for discard

  • Problem: Accidentally delete work
  • Fix: Require typed "discard" confirmation

Red Flags

Never:

  • Proceed with failing tests
  • Merge without verifying tests on result
  • Delete work without confirmation
  • Force-push without explicit request
  • Remove a worktree before confirming merge success
  • Clean up worktrees you didn't create (provenance check)
  • Run git worktree remove from inside the worktree

Always:

  • Verify tests before offering options
  • Detect environment before presenting menu
  • Present exactly 4 options (or 3 for detached HEAD)
  • Get typed confirmation for Option 4
  • Clean up worktree for Options 1 & 4 only
  • cd to main repo root before worktree removal
  • Run git worktree prune after removal

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.