Domain Modeling

Follow the repository's existing glossary and ADR locations, formatting, and decision threshold when it has a convention. Use the structure below when it does not. The default AgentStart role supplies the everyday reading habit; invoke this skill when the model itself needs to change.

Actively build and sharpen the project's domain model as you design. This is the active discipline: challenging terms, inventing edge-case scenarios, and writing the glossary and decisions down the moment they crystallise. (Merely reading GLOSSARY.md for vocabulary is not this skill: that's a one-line habit any skill can do. This skill is for when you're changing the model, not just consuming it.)

File structure

Most repos have a single context:

/
├── GLOSSARY.md
├── docs/
│   └── adr/
│       ├── 0001-event-sourced-orders.md
│       └── 0002-postgres-for-write-model.md
└── src/

If a GLOSSARY-MAP.md exists at the root, the repo has multiple contexts. The map points to where each one lives:

/
├── GLOSSARY-MAP.md
├── docs/
│   └── adr/                          ← system-wide decisions
├── src/
│   ├── ordering/
│   │   ├── GLOSSARY.md
│   │   └── docs/adr/                 ← context-specific decisions
│   └── billing/
│       ├── GLOSSARY.md
│       └── docs/adr/

Create files lazily: only when you have something to write. If no GLOSSARY.md exists, create one when the first term is resolved. If no docs/adr/ exists, create it when the first ADR is needed.

During the session

Challenge against the glossary

When a term appears to conflict with GLOSSARY.md, check the relevant code and test the competing meanings against a concrete scenario. Resolve a naming-only gap from that evidence when possible. Surface the conflict and ask only if the meanings imply materially different behavior that the task cannot resolve.

Sharpen fuzzy language

When the user uses vague or overloaded terms, use project context to propose a precise canonical term. For example, explain whether an "account" in this scenario is a Customer or a User, and ask only if that distinction changes the requested behavior and remains unresolved.

Discuss concrete scenarios

When domain relationships are being discussed, stress-test them with specific scenarios. Invent scenarios that probe edge cases and force the user to be precise about the boundaries between concepts.

Cross-reference with code

When the user states how something works, check whether the code agrees. If you find a contradiction, cite the concrete behavior and resolve it within the task's scope. Ask when the intended behavior remains materially ambiguous.

Update GLOSSARY.md inline

When a term is resolved, update GLOSSARY.md right there. Don't batch these up: capture them as they happen. Use the format in GLOSSARY-FORMAT.md.

GLOSSARY.md should be totally devoid of implementation details. Do not treat GLOSSARY.md as a spec, a scratch pad, or a repository for implementation decisions. It is a glossary and nothing else.

Offer ADRs sparingly

Only offer to create an ADR when all three are true:

1. Hard to reverse: the cost of changing your mind later is meaningful
2. Surprising without context: a future reader will wonder "why did they do it this way?"
3. The result of a real trade-off: there were genuine alternatives and you picked one for specific reasons

If any of the three is missing, skip the ADR. Use the format in ADR-FORMAT.md.