refactor
Skill871 starsChanged 5 months agoMITView on GitHub
Safely refactor code with test coverage as a safety net. Use `--diff` to simplify just the current working diff before committing.
196 other projects use a version of this, 2 of them edited.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- Doist/todoist-aitheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- Doist/todoist-clitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- rvdbreemen/OTGW-firmwaretheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- paulocsb/worldcup-fifa-pooltheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- DnsQueen/orcinus-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- taixuann/development-spacetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use ascii-diagram, agent-context-isolation and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
SethGammonSkillascii-diagram
Generate perfectly aligned ASCII diagrams — architecture, flow, sequence, box-and-arrow. Uses a programmatic character-grid approach so alignment is guaranteed by math, not token prediction. Includes post-render verification.
Also in 4 projects that use this
parcadeiSkillagent-context-isolation
Agent Context Isolation
Also in 3 projects that use this
parcadeiSkillagentica-infrastructure
Reference guide for Agentica multi-agent infrastructure APIs
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +8 more from parcadei
Other versions196 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 2
- zebbern/termstack★ 490% same
- krishnamallam/upbox★ 290% same
Wrote their own version · 194
- github/awesome-copilot★ 41ksame name
- unkeyed/unkey★ 5.5ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v2★ 3.9ksame name
- parcadei/Continuous-Claude-v3★ 3.9ksame name
- adobe/S3Mock★ 1.2ksame name
- SethGammon/Citadel★ 927same name
- JordanCoin/codemap★ 710same name
- membrane/api-gateway★ 658same name
- Doist/todoist-ai★ 563same name
184 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository14 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- catchupSkill
- claude-mdSkill
- context-budgetSkill
- debug-fixSkill
- explainSkill
- fix-issueSkill
- onboardSkill
- pr-reviewSkill
- setupdotclaudeSkill
- shipSkill
- specSkill
- tddSkill
- test-writerSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 169 edited versions we read keep these.
12
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 13
Read the code and its tests
- Distinctive: line 15
If there are no tests, WRITE TESTS FIRST.
- Distinctive: line 20
Check: does this change any external behavior?
- Distinctive: line 24
Run tests after EACH step.
- Distinctive: line 25
If a test breaks, undo the last step and make a smaller change
- Distinctive: line 28
All existing tests pass
- Distinctive: line 37
Read the diff. For each hunk ask: would a reviewer write this more simply?
- Distinctive: line 39
Remove dead parameters, unused returns, speculative generality ("might need it later")
- Distinctive: line 40
Delete comments that restate the code, and defensive checks duplicating guarantees the codebase already makes
- Distinctive: line 47
If you can't run the tests, don't refactor
- Distinctive: line 48
Never mix refactoring with behavior changes in the same commit
- Distinctive: line 49
If the refactoring is large (10+ files), break it into multiple commits
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 169 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Refactor $ARGUMENTS safely. If $ARGUMENTS contains --diff, use Diff mode below instead.
Process
1. Understand the current state
- Read the code and its tests
- Identify what the code does, its callers, and its dependencies
- If there are no tests, WRITE TESTS FIRST. You need a safety net before changing anything
2. Plan the refactoring
- State what you're changing and why (clearer naming, reduced duplication, better structure)
- List the specific transformations (extract function, inline variable, move module, etc.)
- Check: does this change any external behavior? If yes, this isn't a refactor. Reconsider.
3. Make changes in small, testable steps
- One transformation at a time
- Run tests after EACH step. Not at the end
- If a test breaks, undo the last step and make a smaller change
4. Verify
- All existing tests pass
- Lint and typecheck pass
- The public API hasn't changed (unless that was the explicit goal)
- The code is objectively simpler. Fewer lines, fewer branches, clearer names
Diff mode (--diff): simplify what you just wrote
The pre-commit polish pass. Target = the current working diff (git diff + git diff --cached; if clean, the last commit). Goal: make the diff smaller and clearer with identical behavior.
- Read the diff. For each hunk ask: would a reviewer write this more simply?
- Inline abstractions used once that the diff itself introduced
- Remove dead parameters, unused returns, speculative generality ("might need it later")
- Delete comments that restate the code, and defensive checks duplicating guarantees the codebase already makes
- Align naming with the surrounding file's conventions
- Touch ONLY lines in the diff (plus mechanical consequences like an import). Never expand into surrounding code — that's regular refactor mode.
- Show the proposed simplifications, confirm, apply in small steps, run the tests for the touched files after each.
- Report: lines before → after. If nothing to simplify, say "diff is already minimal" and stop — don't invent work.
Rules
- If you can't run the tests, don't refactor
- Never mix refactoring with behavior changes in the same commit
- If the refactoring is large (10+ files), break it into multiple commits
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

