audit-first-demo
Skill0 starsChanged 49 days agoApache-2.0View on GitHub
Make every feature explainable and demoable: design an audit-first output view (grouped results, the evidence behind each, the computed figures, the gaps/findings, and the suggested next actions), render it to dependency-free static HTML panels, drive it with a synthetic-data demo script, and capture screenshots. Use when building the output surface for a feature, preparing a stakeholder demo, or when asked to "show how this looks".
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- portable-genai/data-quality-governanceword for word, first seen Oct 11, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- portable-genai/data-quality-governance★ 0100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository6 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- deploy-and-residency-hardeningSkill
- deterministic-domain-serviceSkill
- embeddable-secure-uiSkill
- iterative-code-reviewSkill
- vertical-slice-deliverySkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈0
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 35
Keep it serializable to plain JSON (a to_jsonable helper) so the renderer and tests can consume it without importing the domain.
- Very specific: line 94
Use a fixed viewport + device_scale_factor=2 for crisp images.
- Very specific: line 128
Docs style: no em-dashes in .md or .html files (including the renderer's HTML output), commit messages, or PR bodies.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Audit-first output + demo
A feature nobody can see or verify is half-built. This skill turns a deterministic result
(from deterministic-domain-service) into something a stakeholder can read, trust, and run
in a demo, without standing up a frontend.
The principle is audit-first: the output is designed for someone who must verify the decision, not just consume it. It shows the grouped result, the evidence behind each part, the computed figures, the gaps/findings the system detected, and the concrete next actions, each traceable to its source.
The three artifacts
1. The audit view (a domain output type)
A single <Subject>AuditView dataclass that bundles everything a reviewer needs:
- the headline result + computed figures (e.g. coverage, score, allocation, ranking);
- groups: the result broken into meaningful buckets, each with the evidence ids / citations that support it;
- findings/gaps: what the deterministic engine flagged, severity-ranked;
- suggested actions: what to do next (information to request, a fix, an approval);
- the per-feature panels (each slice attaches its own assessment as an optional field).
Keep it serializable to plain JSON (a to_jsonable helper) so the renderer and tests can
consume it without importing the domain.
2. A dependency-free HTML renderer
A single script that reads the audit view JSON and writes static HTML: no framework, no
build step, inline CSS. One render_<panel>(data) function per panel; compose them into a
page. This keeps demos reproducible and screenshots trivial. The renderer emits HTML, so the
no-em-dash docs rule applies to its output too (see the foot of this skill).
Renderer conventions that paid off:
- One function per panel; each takes the (possibly
None) sub-dict and returns""when the panel does not APPLY to this case, so partially-populated cases still render. - A small status pill (
CLEARED/ENHANCED REVIEW/OVERDUE...) per panel header driven by the assessment'sescalates/status. - Defensive accessors:
esc()that coercesNone->"";.get()for every optional field (enums serialize to their.valuestring; match on those). - A defensive accessor must never make missing evidence look like clean evidence. An absent
citation, an absent assessment or an absent status renders as a VISIBLE gap ("no provenance
recorded", a warning pill), never as an empty cell and never as
CLEARED. This is an audit view: its whole job is to let a human see what was not checked.data.get("escalates", False)anddata.get("status", "CLEARED")are the fail-open shape here, because they turn a serializer bug or a renamed field into a reassuring page. Default the status pill to the ALARMING value, or raise. And render "0 findings because the check ran and found none" differently from "0 findings because the check never ran". - Severity -> color map; provenance rendered as compact "chips" (source id + locator).
- Watch out: in Python f-strings, no backslashes inside the expression; precompute strings.
3. A synthetic-data demo script
A script that builds an obviously-fictional scenario, runs the orchestrator + every feature service, prints a readable trace to stdout, and writes the audit view JSON for the renderer. This is also your end-to-end smoke test for a slice. Make it deterministic so screenshots never drift.
Name the demo scripts consistently across repos so they are discoverable: a <prefix>_demo.py
(the offline run that writes the JSON), the render_<subject>.py renderer, and a
<prefix>_demo_playwright.py for the screenshot/presenter variant, with a short
scripts/README.md listing them. Same names everywhere, only the prefix changes.
The durable audit record (operational, not just the view)
The audit VIEW is for a human reading one result; the audit EVENT is the durable proof the result happened. Every consequential assessment writes one immutable audit event:
- One event per assessment, append-only / WORM (write once, read many), carrying the
decision (e.g. ALLOWED vs ESCALATED), the actor, and the citations, never the raw subject
content. Redact before you write (see
deterministic-domain-service). - Content-free traces. Spans and metrics record that work happened and how long it took, not what was in it. Never log a credential, an identity assertion, or PII.
- Local stays offline. The
localadapter writes the event to an append-only local store (e.g. a SQLite table) so the audit path is exercised in tests; the cloud adapter writes to the immutable sink stood up bydeploy-and-residency-hardening.
Screenshots (headless, scriptable)
Render the HTML, then screenshot with a headless browser (Playwright). Patterns that work:
- Full-page screenshot for the whole view; per-panel crops via an element selector
(
xpath=//section[.//h2[contains(text(),'<Panel>')]]) for focused stakeholder shots. - Use a fixed viewport +
device_scale_factor=2for crisp images. - Send the image to the user as the deliverable; you don't need to commit binaries.
Optional: a presenter-controlled live demo
For a guided walkthrough, add a tiny local server + a Playwright script that waits for the
presenter between steps (so the person demoing controls pacing). Drive a locally running
instance, not production. Keep a DEMO.md covering both the offline demo and the
managed-stack demo, with prerequisites and links to setup.
Domain examples
- Campaign planning: panels for channel mix (with the reach/audience evidence behind each split), budget lines, the pacing/over-concentration findings, and "segments to validate" actions.
- Ad-creative generation: panels showing each variant, the brand/spec/policy checks it passed or failed (with the rule cited), and "fix before ship" actions.
- Performance marketing: panels for ROAS vs target by campaign (with the metric source), attribution gaps, and the proposed budget shifts pending human approval.
- Retail recommendations: panels for the ranked recommendations, the eligibility/ inventory evidence per item, filtered-out candidates with reasons, and the "why recommended" blurb.
Checklist
- An
AuditViewtype bundles result + groups(+evidence) + findings + suggested actions. - Serializable to plain JSON; each feature attaches an optional panel field.
- Dependency-free HTML renderer; one defensive function per panel; absent panel -> "".
- Deterministic synthetic-data demo writes the JSON and prints a readable trace.
- Screenshots captured headless (full page + per-panel crops) and shared.
- DEMO.md / presenter script if a live walkthrough is needed.
- Each assessment writes one immutable, already-redacted, content-free audit event.
- Only fictional data; demos run offline on the
localprofile.
Docs style: no em-dashes in .md or .html files (including the renderer's HTML output),
commit messages, or PR bodies. See skills/README.md.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

