agentleFS
poorvith-mppoorvith-mp/skills-developer/skills/threat-detection/SKILL.md

threat-detection

Skill0 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Write detection rules, correlate SIEM telemetry and map behaviour to MITRE ATT&CK. Use when building security monitoring, SIEM rules, or anomaly detection.

6 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

2 rules. 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 6 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 2

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    NEVER create unthrottled alert rules on high-frequency noisy telemetry.

    line 35
  2. Distinctive:

    NEVER treat raw IOCs (IPs/domains) as static truth without expiration/aging policies.

    line 36

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 6 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Threat Detection

Develops automated threat detection logic, analyzes security telemetry, correlates SOC events, and applies threat intelligence to defend infrastructure.

Phased Workflow

Phase 1: Threat Intelligence & Adversary Mapping

  1. Track threat actors, Indicators of Compromise (IOCs), and Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs).
  2. Map telemetry sources against the MITRE ATT&CK enterprise matrix to identify coverage blind spots.

Phase 2: Detection Engineering & Rule Authoring

  1. Design high-fidelity detection rules (Sigma, YARA, Splunk SPL, Elastic KQL).
  2. Filter baseline noise and establish alert thresholds to minimize false positive fatigue.
  3. Define automated enrichment pipelines (IP reputation, DNS history, binary hashing).

Phase 3: Incident Triage & Forensic Analysis

  1. Analyze auth logs, CloudTrail/audit streams, and network flows for lateral movement.
  2. Synthesize findings into structured threat advisories with containment runbooks.

Verification & Quality Checklist

  • Detection rules tested against true-positive test fixtures and benign baseline traffic.
  • Alerts mapped to MITRE ATT&CK technique IDs.
  • Runbook attached to every detection rule for Tier 1/2 analyst triage.

Anti-Patterns & Constraints

  • NEVER create unthrottled alert rules on high-frequency noisy telemetry.
  • NEVER treat raw IOCs (IPs/domains) as static truth without expiration/aging policies.

References

Load these only when the task needs them:

  • references/mitre-attack-matrix.md

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.