agentleFS
poco-aipoco-ai/Agentero/.agents/skills/release/SKILL.md

release

Skill2k starsChanged 23 days agoMITView on GitHub

Prepare and optionally update Agentero GitHub Release notes from merged pull requests and uncovered first-parent commits. Use when the user asks to prepare, dry-run, review, or update a release; summarize changes between versions or tags; or fill a Draft GitHub Release after the v* release workflow. Produce mirrored Chinese and English notes (Chinese first) and require explicit approval before changing GitHub state.

196 other projects use a version of this.

Trending

More talk lately.thin dataabout the whole repository

Dec 2025: 0 mentionsJan 2026: 0 mentionsFeb 2026: 0 mentionsMar 2026: 0 mentionsApr 2026: 0 mentionsMay 2026: 0 mentionsJun 2026: 0 mentionsJul 2026: 0 mentionsAug 2026: 1 mentionSep 2026: 2 mentionsOct 2026: 1 mentionNov 2026: 2 mentions
Dec 2025Jun 2026Nov 2026
Mentions a month of the poco-ai/Agentero repository that our weekly crawl found: only 6 in all, so this is a hint, not a trend. There is no adoption data for this file yet.

Most recently taken up by

Who's talking about poco-ai/Agentero

The biggest 5 of 6 mentions linking to the repository that our crawl found. Each line is their own headline.

See all 6

Talked about on GitHub and Bluesky (6 times).

On GitHub · 5

Used with

Projects with it also use create-agent-adapter, changelog-style and 10 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • MicrosoftSkill

    create-agent-adapter

    Technical guide for creating a new Paperclip agent adapter. Use when building a new adapter package, adding support for a new AI coding tool (e.g. a new CLI agent, API-based agent, or custom process), or when modifying the adapter system. Covers the required interfaces, module structure, registration points, and conventions derived from the existing claude-local and codex-local adapters.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • GrinvSkill

    changelog-style

    Turn a commit range into CHANGELOG.md entries following common-changelog style. Use when finishing a PR or cutting a release, to write/fix the [Unreleased] section's entries — moving [Unreleased] under a new dated version heading is a separate, automated step (see the release skill / scripts/sync-version.ts), not this skill's job.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • GrinvSkill

    docs-consistency-check

    Check README/manifest.json/server.json/CHANGELOG.md/AGENTS.md and docs/*.md for drift against the actual registered tools and source. Use after adding, renaming, or removing a tool, or as part of a live-audit pass.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • Microsoft AzureSkill

    component-release

    Prepares a verifiable Agent Landing Zone UI release. Use for release branches, VERSION, changelog entries, tags, release notes, and compatibility evidence; never publish without explicit human approval.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • Microsoft AzureSkill

    documentation-consistency

    Keeps AI Landing Zone contributor, user, and operator documentation aligned with shipped Bicep behavior. Use for parameters, defaults, outputs, topology, deployment flow, operations, or releases.

    Also in 8 projects that use this

  • rivet-devSkill

    launch-graphics

    Generate agentOS marketing/launch graphics (launch & social heroes, code-snippet cards) from the committed generators in docs-internal/graphics. Use when asked to make, update, or render an agentOS launch image, social image, "agentOS Apps" graphic, or technical code-snippet image.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +3 more from Grinv

The file

Show its rules and text

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

24 rules. 0 are common, 18 are distinctive, and 6 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 186 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 18

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 6

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read git status, the current branch, local and remote tags, and the target Release state.

    line 20
  2. Distinctive:

    Never move or overwrite an existing remote tag.

    line 29
  3. Distinctive:

    Run the bundled collector from the repository root:

    line 34
  4. Distinctive:

    Use merged pull requests as the main narrative units.

    line 40
  5. Distinctive:

    Prefer the PR title, body, linked issues, labels, and changed behavior.

    line 46
  6. Distinctive:

    Use the first-parent commit subject, body, and changed files when no merged PR covers the commit.

    line 47
  7. Distinctive:

    Keep a PR, commit, or issue URL as evidence for every bullet.

    line 57
  8. Distinctive:

    Write Chinese first and English second.

    line 69
  9. Very specific:

    Start the body exactly at ## 概要.

    line 120
  10. Very specific:

    Do not add English or 中文 wrapper headings or language navigation links.

    line 122
  11. Very specific:

    Keep Summary / 概要 as prose, not a bullet list.

    line 125
  12. Very specific:

    Start every grouped bullet with <keyword or short phrase>: .

    line 126
  13. Distinctive:

    Follow the keyword with one or two specific, user-facing sentences.

    line 129
  14. Very specific:

    Use Features / 新功能, Improvements / 改进, Fixes / 修复, and Resolved Issues / 已解决问题 when evidence exists.

    line 130
  15. Very specific:

    Add mirrored groups such as Security / 安全性, Breaking Changes / 破坏性变更, or Known Limitations / 已知限制 only when needed.

    line 133
  16. Distinctive:

    Keep terminology and factual scope equivalent across languages.

    line 138
  17. Distinctive:

    After drafting the notes, write them directly to the Draft GitHub Release.

    line 144
  18. Distinctive:

    Verify the remote tag exists and the Release is a Draft.

    line 146
  19. Distinctive:

    Verify the required Release workflow completed successfully and expected assets exist.

    line 147
  20. Distinctive:

    Write the body to a temporary file and run:

    line 149
  21. Distinctive:

    Remove the temporary file.

    line 159
  22. Distinctive:

    Do not publish the Draft, push commits, create or move tags, or change version files unless the user separately requests those actions.

    line 162
  23. Distinctive:

    When the user explicitly requests a dry run, skip writing to GitHub.

    line 169
  24. Distinctive:

    Do not create a repository note file for a dry run unless requested.

    line 177

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 186 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Agentero Release

Prepare evidence-backed bilingual Release notes and write them directly to the Draft GitHub Release. Use dry runs when the user explicitly requests read-only preview.

Establish the release range

  1. Read git status, the current branch, local and remote tags, and the target Release state. Preserve unrelated working-tree changes.
  2. Resolve both endpoints to immutable commits and verify that the base is an ancestor of the target.
  3. For a stable target, default to the latest earlier published stable Release reachable from the target. For a prerelease, prefer the preceding prerelease in the same version series, then fall back to the latest stable Release.
  4. Display the selected <base>..<target> range. Stop for user direction when the target, release channel, ancestry, or previous Release is ambiguous.
  5. Never move or overwrite an existing remote tag. Treat a tag already observed by GitHub Actions or attached to a Release as immutable.

Collect evidence

Run the bundled collector from the repository root:

node .agents/skills/release/scripts/collect-release-context.mjs <base> <target>

Use merged pull requests as the main narrative units. Always inspect uncovered first-parent commits as a second source; the presence of one PR does not make other mainline commits disappear.

For each candidate change:

  • Prefer the PR title, body, linked issues, labels, and changed behavior.
  • Use the first-parent commit subject, body, and changed files when no merged PR covers the commit.
  • Inspect the relevant diff or documentation when the public effect is unclear.
  • Collect issues closed during the release range that are not already covered by a merged PR. Use gh issue list --state closed --search "closed:>={base-date}" or inspect Closes / Fixes references in commit messages.
  • Exclude release bumps, formatting, tests, internal refactors, and routine documentation unless they change installation, compatibility, security, or visible behavior.
  • Combine multiple commits that implement one user-visible outcome.
  • Keep a PR, commit, or issue URL as evidence for every bullet.
  • Include the first committer or PR author for each bullet so contributors are credited in the notes. Resolve GitHub usernames — the git commit author name (e.g. QiyuanChen) is not necessarily the GitHub handle (e.g. qychen2001). For PRs, use the PR author.login field directly. For uncovered commits, run gh api repos/poco-ai/Agentero/commits/<sha> and extract the author.login field. Fall back to the commit author.name only when the GitHub API returns null (e.g. unauthenticated local commits).
  • Report uncertainty or conflicting evidence instead of inventing behavior.

Draft the notes

Write Chinese first and English second. Mirror the same groups, bullet count, order, meaning, and evidence links across both languages.

Use this shape:

## 概要

<一段简短文字,说明本次发布主题和用户影响。>

## 新功能

- **<关键词或短语>**: <一到两句具体介绍。>([#123](...) by @author)

## 改进

- **<关键词或短语>**: <一到两句具体介绍。>([commit](...) by @author)

## 修复

- **<关键词或短语>**: <一到两句具体介绍。>([#124](...) by @author)

## 已解决问题

- **<关键词或短语>**: <一到两句具体介绍。>([#125](...) by @author)

---

## Summary

<One short paragraph describing the release theme and user impact.>

## Features

- **<Keyword or short phrase>**: <One or two concrete sentences.> ([#123](...) by @author)

## Improvements

- **<Keyword or short phrase>**: <One or two concrete sentences.> ([commit](...) by @author)

## Fixes

- **<Keyword or short phrase>**: <One or two concrete sentences.> ([#124](...) by @author)

## Resolved Issues

- **<Keyword or short phrase>**: <One or two concrete sentences.> ([#125](...) by @author)

Apply these writing rules:

  • Start the body exactly at ## 概要. Do not repeat the Release title, version, or date inside the body.
  • Do not add English or 中文 wrapper headings or language navigation links. Separate the Chinese and English sections with a standalone Markdown horizontal rule (---), then begin English content at ## Summary.
  • Keep Summary / 概要 as prose, not a bullet list.
  • Start every grouped bullet with **<keyword or short phrase>**: . Keep the colon and following space outside the bold markers in both languages; never write **<keyword>:** or **<关键词>:**.
  • Follow the keyword with one or two specific, user-facing sentences.
  • Use Features / 新功能, Improvements / 改进, Fixes / 修复, and Resolved Issues / 已解决问题 when evidence exists. Resolved Issues is for issues closed during the release that are not already covered by a merged PR. Add mirrored groups such as Security / 安全性, Breaking Changes / 破坏性变更, or Known Limitations / 已知限制 only when needed.
  • Omit empty groups.
  • Describe shipped behavior, not implementation activity or test counts.
  • Keep terminology and factual scope equivalent across languages; do not make one language a shortened translation of the other.
  • End with a compare link when the repository and both refs are available.

Write the Release notes

After drafting the notes, write them directly to the Draft GitHub Release.

  1. Verify the remote tag exists and the Release is a Draft.
  2. Verify the required Release workflow completed successfully and expected assets exist.
  3. Write the body to a temporary file and run:

    gh release edit "<tag>" \
      --repo poco-ai/Agentero \
      --verify-tag \
      --notes-file "<temporary-file>"
  4. Fetch the Release again and confirm the stored body matches.
  5. Remove the temporary file.
  6. Return the selected range, evidence coverage, and the written body.

Do not publish the Draft, push commits, create or move tags, or change version files unless the user separately requests those actions. Publishing with gh release edit "<tag>" --draft=false requires explicit approval after the final body and assets have been reviewed.

Dry run

When the user explicitly requests a dry run, skip writing to GitHub. Return:

  1. The selected range and evidence coverage: PR count, uncovered first-parent commit count, and any warnings.
  2. The complete bilingual Release note candidate.
  3. A statement that no version, commit, tag, push, workflow, or GitHub Release was changed.

Do not create a repository note file for a dry run unless requested.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.