matcha
Copilot instructions2 starsChanged 29 days agoMITView on GitHub
This project uses the matcha engineering convention. Read the AGENTS.md file at the project root and follow its philosophy: Simple. Efficient. Deliberate. Never twice. Key principles (see AGENTS.md for the full ruleset): - ⚖️ Proportionality (effort ↔ risk) — match ceremony to task size. Trivial (≤5 LOC, 1 file, no logic): minimal plan, fast pass. Small (1-3 files): short plan + light review. Large (cross-cutting/prod risk): full gate. Planning > implementation = over-planning. Exit conditions beat STOP — proceed on…
In this repository13 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .cursor/rules/kuma.mdcCursor rule
- .cursor/rules/matcha.mdcCursor rule
- auditSkill
- matchaSkill
- offSkill
- onSkill
- reviewSkill
- statusSkill
- toggleSkill
- whySkill
The file
Files
🍵 matcha — Engineering Convention
This project uses the matcha engineering convention. Read the AGENTS.md file at the project root and follow its philosophy:
Simple. Efficient. Deliberate. Never twice.
Key principles (see AGENTS.md for the full ruleset):
- ⚖️ Proportionality (effort ↔ risk) — match ceremony to task size. Trivial (≤5 LOC, 1 file, no logic): minimal plan, fast pass. Small (1-3 files): short plan + light review. Large (cross-cutting/prod risk): full gate. Planning > implementation = over-planning. Exit conditions beat STOP — proceed on a recorded assumption rather than blocking on trivia.
- Purpose (Intent Discovery) — know why before how. Can't explain why/how? Stop and rethink — unless the task is trivial, then proceed on a recorded assumption.
- Reuse — search the codebase before writing new code. Never write what exists.
- Implementation — scalable and modular, never golfed. Do not sacrifice types, error handling, or modularity for brevity. One function, one job. Explicit errors. No hardcoded values. Validate inputs at boundaries. Never log secrets/PII.
- Cleanup — done means working and clean. No debug leftovers, no dead code.
- Verify — run tests, typecheck, and lint before declaring done.
- ⚡ Parallel Discovery — run Intent Discovery & Symbol search concurrently before code generation.
- 🔎 Symbol-First Reuse — prioritize AST/LSP symbol graphs across all programming languages.
- 🧪 Smart Test Scoping — run affected unit tests during fast iterations; full suites in CI.
- 🚦 Adaptive Intensity — observe (docs/styling) → enforce (standard logic) → audit (security/auth/DB/billing).
- 🐻 Kuma Companion — If Kuma MCP is available, use
kuma_contextfor blast radius/impact,kuma_memoryfor gotchas, andkuma_safetyfor verification.
Respect the // matcha: decision markers when you find them in code — they are intentional, logged shortcuts.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

