init
Skill4 starsChanged 59 days agoMITView on GitHub
Make a repository ready for the issue/PR lifecycle skills in one command — record its facts in the committed profile (`.claude/skills/repo-profile.md`: commit identity, build/test commands, labels, merge style, conflict hot-spots), converge its labels, issue forms, settings, topics and Pages source from a manifest, then refresh the profile. Use for a new repo or one that drifted: "init this repo for the kit", "set up the repo profile", "set up the labels", "configure this repository the way the kit expects", « initialise ce repo pour les skills », « configure les labels du repo ». `--plan` writes nothing on GitHub; `--profile-only` only reads or regenerates the profile. Does NOT write a CLAUDE.md, file issues, implement code, or merge PRs.
137 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- naderelewa/Product-to-Prodtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ShahriarBijoy/show-me-howtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- MMACABRE/SKILLStheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- BSSE23047/nauraiz-devtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- edwinidrus/dragonhoardtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- NilsHellwig/acl-paper-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use daily-arxiv, exp-eval and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
LambenthanSkilldaily-arxiv
每日从 arXiv 拉取新论文,过滤相关性,auto-ingest 高优先级论文,检测 SOTA 更新
Also in 5 projects that use this
LambenthanSkillexp-eval
实验判决门:Review LLM 独立评判实验结果 → 4 种判决路径 → 自动更新 claims confidence、ideas status、graph edges
Also in 5 projects that use this
skyllwtSkillexp-pilot-eval
Pilot result evaluation — read pilot results, apply success criteria, update idea page (pilot_result, failure_reason if failed), generate PILOT_VERDICT_REPORT. Called by /ideate Phase 5 after /exp-pilot-run.
Also in 4 projects that use this
skyllwtSkillexp-pilot-run
Pilot experiment execution — read Pilot Spec YAML, write pilot code, run experiment(Confirm with the user before operation and require the applicant to conduct manual inspection), return results. Called by /ideate Phase 5. Does NOT modify wiki pages or judge pass/fail.
Also in 4 projects that use this
gaebalaiSkillcodex-system
PROACTIVELY consult Codex CLI, your highly capable supporter with exceptional reasoning and task completion abilities. Codex is a trusted expert you should ALWAYS consult BEFORE making decisions on: design choices, implementation approaches, debugging strategies, refactoring plans, or any non-trivial problem. When uncertain, consult Codex. Don't hesitate - Codex provides better analysis. Explicit triggers: "think deeper", "analyze", "second opinion", "consult codex".
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +6 more from Lambenthan
- +1 more from skyllwt
Other versions137 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- phmatray/ai-migration-kit★ 4100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 136
- microsoft/vscode★ 195ksame name
- mcollina/skills★ 2ksame name
- skyllwt/OmegaWiki★ 1.7ksame name
- DAIR-AutoResearch/AutoSci★ 1.7ksame name
- PKU-DAIR/AutoSci★ 1.7ksame name
- skyllwt/AutoSci★ 1.7ksame name
- TokenRollAI/cc-plugin★ 483same name
- pipecat-ai/gradient-bang★ 420same name
- AlexPEClub/ai-coding-starter-kit★ 382same name
- dannysmith/tauri-template★ 312same name
126 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository15 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- .claude/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- .github/copilot-instructions.mdCopilot instructions
- .cursor/rules/tagout.mdcCursor rule
- auto-devSkill
- create-issueSkill
- create-prSkill
- debug-issueSkill
- deliver-issueSkill
- implement-issueSkill
- merge-prSkill
- migrate-legacySkill
- review-followupsSkill
- review-sessionsSkill
- triage-backlogSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 124 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 98
After an apply that followed a plan exit 1 (drift — apply itself exits 0 either way), re-run step 1 on its generation path: the label axes …
- Very specific: line 104
Run hands-off. show and plan are reads — no ceremony.
- Very specific: line 133
Every <!-- TODO: … --> left in the profile goes in Assumed · skipped · unverified, by name, and so does whether --prune ran.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 124 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Make a repository ready for the lifecycle skills
create-issue, implement-issue, merge-pr and auto-dev are generic workflows wrapped around a
thin layer of repo-specific facts. This skill does the whole setup story in one pass: it records
those facts in a committed profile, converges the configuration they describe (labels, issue
forms, settings, topics, Pages source) from a declarative manifest, and refreshes the profile so
it reports what now exists. Decision record: ADR 0018.
The profile is data, not a skill (ADR 0001): the lifecycle skills read it at their Step 1, and only reach for this skill when it is missing.
Three paths
| Invocation | Does | Writes on GitHub |
/tagout:init | profile → plan → apply when it found drift → refresh the profile | yes — labels, forms, settings, topics, Pages |
/tagout:init --plan | profile → plan; prints the drift | no |
/tagout:init --profile-only | show the profile, or generate it when missing (add --refresh to regenerate) | no |
Pick the path from the request, not only from the flag. A request to read, show or
regenerate the profile takes --profile-only; one to check or list drift takes --plan.
apply runs only on a request to set up, configure or converge the repository, or on a bare
/tagout:init — the writer never fires from a read-only question (ADR 0018).
Do this
Two bundled scripts do the deterministic work; run them from anywhere in the target repo (each
anchors to the git root). <skill-dir> is this skill's base directory — given when the skill loads.
1. The profile
bash "<skill-dir>/scripts/repo-profile.sh" show- It printed the profile (and no
--refreshwas asked) → keep it; relay the headline values (repo slug, commit identity, build/test commands, integration style). - It printed
NO_PROFILE(exit 3), or--refreshwas asked → the generation path (on--plan, which writes nothing locally, say the profile is missing instead and go on to step 2). Readreferences/generating.mdand follow it: runrepo-profile.sh detect, fillreferences/profile-template.mdfrom the facts it emits, write.claude/skills/repo-profile.md, and list every TODO you left. - Exit 4 → not inside a git repository: say so and stop.
On --profile-only, stop here and recap.
2. The manifest
bash "<skill-dir>/scripts/repo-setup.sh" planplan writes nothing. On --plan, show the delta and stop. Otherwise, when it found drift, converge:
bash "<skill-dir>/scripts/repo-setup.sh" applyThe manifest is the repo's own .github/repo-setup.yml when it has one, else the kit's
templates/repo-setup.yml; --manifest <path> overrides both. The rules apply follows (additive,
pruneKeep, never clobber a form, placeholders reported !TODO, topics additive, Pages never
disabled) are spelled out in references/desired-state.md —
relay them before a first run against a repo that already has labels.
| Exit | Meaning | What to do |
| 0 | converged | Say so. |
| 1 | plan found drift | Show the delta, then apply — except a !TODO line: apply never creates a placeholder, so fill it into the manifest instead. |
| 2 | bad usage, or an unreadable manifest | Fix the manifest; never partially apply. |
| 3 | a surface was refused | Relay which one and why — the rest did land. Carry on to step 3. |
| 4 | not inside a git repository | Say so and stop. |
3. Refresh the profile
After an apply that followed a plan exit 1 (drift — apply itself exits 0 either way), re-run step 1 on its generation path: the label axes and
issue forms the profile reported as missing exist now, so the profile must record them before a
lifecycle skill reads it. This step is part of the run, not advice to the user.
Autonomy contract
Run hands-off. show and plan are reads — no ceremony. The generation path is best-effort
inference: fill what detect proves and write a marked <!-- TODO: … --> for the rest rather than
inventing a value. Before apply, get a yes only when the repo is not the user's own or the run
includes --prune. Never invent a taxonomy: a missing axis is a manifest edit and a re-run, never a
hand-made gh label create. A refused surface is reported and the run moves on. Stop only for a
real blocker: not inside a git repo, or gh unauthenticated when the request needs GitHub (tell the
user to run ! gh auth login -h github.com).
Inputs
--plan— profile, thenplan; nothing is written on GitHub.--profile-only— the profile alone; with--refresh, regenerate it even if one exists.--prune— passed toapply: delete labels the manifest does not declare (never thepruneKeepones). Never implied.--manifest <path>— a manifest other than the repo's own or the kit's default.- A path argument — a repo other than the current directory, passed as the scripts'
[dir].
Recap
Close with the shared recap shape — ../_shared/recap.md. It owns the four
blocks (verdict · What happened · Artifacts · Assumed · skipped · unverified, where
None is a required answer rather than an omission) and the Next line, which is read off this
skill's row in that file's hand-off table instead of being decided again here. Everything below is
only what init adds on top of them.
- Say which path ran (
/tagout:init,--plan,--profile-only) and whether the profile was read back or generated — they carry very different confidence. - Name each GitHub surface separately — labels, issue forms, settings, topics, Pages — and whether it converged, was already converged, or was refused (and by what).
- Every
<!-- TODO: … -->left in the profile goes in Assumed · skipped · unverified, by name, and so does whether--pruneran.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

