design-dialogue
Skill3 starsChanged 17 days agoNo licenceView on GitHub
Turns an idea into an approved design through interactive dialogue: explores the affected code, asks one question at a time, proposes one approach and argues against it, presents the design in sections, has the consolidated summary design-reviewed, and takes explicit approval before any hand-off. Offered as an option whenever design work above the design threshold begins, and triggers directly on an explicit request for interactive design: to design it together, to be walked through the design, to have an idea grilled or pressure-tested, or for you to push back on your own proposal. Scales from quickly capturing a design the user already holds to walking a newcomer through the area while designing. Not for bugs (debug-investigation takes its own fix approval), not for tickets already carrying an approved design, not for trivial changes below the design threshold, and not when the user asks for hands-off deliberation, which is design-committee's job.
In this repository12 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- debug-investigationSkill
- design-committeeSkill
- design-handoffSkill
- design-recoverySkill
- design-reviewSkill
- review-branchSkill
- work-review-receiveSkill
- work-review-requestSkill
- work-swarmSkill
- work-tddSkill
- work-verificationSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈3
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
No licence file, so all rights are reserved — read it at the source. We count its rules but don't quote them. Read them on GitHub.
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.