commit
Skill1 starsChanged 8 months agoMITView on GitHub
Smart commit creation with conventional commits. Use when user says "commit" or requests committing changes. Handles staged file detection, suggests splits for multi-concern changes, and applies proper commit format without emoji prefixes.
188 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- daledesilva/obsidian_inktheir own version, first seen Nov 9, 2026
- thoughtbot/rails-consultanttheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- jisuzzzz/haechitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dirien/yet-another-agent-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- denysdovhan/skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use validate-plan, act-on-feedback and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
shawn-dumasSkillvalidate-plan
Validate an orchestration plan after pre-flight certification. Runs adversarial review, deep review (verify prompt data against codebase), and PoC gate for risky approaches. Auto-invoked by orchestrate-* skills at Step 8.
Also in 5 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillact-on-feedback
Act on user feedback attached to the current session. Use when the user submits feedback on the session's changes via the Submit Feedback button.
Also in 3 projects that use this
decocmsSkilladd-mcp-tools
Guide for adding new MCP tools with consistent patterns for schemas, tool definitions, registry updates, and Better Auth integration
Also in 3 projects that use this
MicrosoftSkillgenerate-run-commands
Generate or modify run commands for the current session. Use when the user wants to set up or update run commands that appear in the session's Run button.
Also in 3 projects that use this
mitsuhikoSkilloebb-scotty
Austrian rail travel planner (ÖBB Scotty). Use when planning train journeys in Austria, checking departures/arrivals at stations, or looking for service disruptions. Covers ÖBB trains, S-Bahn, regional trains, and connections to neighboring countries.
Also in 3 projects that use this
mitsuhikoSkillpi-share
Load and parse session transcripts from shittycodingagent.ai/buildwithpi.ai/buildwithpi.com/pi.dev (pi-share) URLs. Fetches gists, decodes embedded session data, and extracts conversation history.
Also in 3 projects that use this
Other versions188 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 188
- microsoft/vscode★ 195ksame name
- TryGhost/Ghost★ 56ksame name
- ToolJet/ToolJet★ 41ksame name
- ShareX/ShareX★ 41ksame name
- openai/symphony★ 27ksame name
- ccusage/ccusage★ 19ksame name
- ryoppippi/ccusage★ 19ksame name
- windmill-labs/windmill★ 18ksame name
- EverMind-AI/EverMemOS★ 14ksame name
- EverMind-AI/EverOS★ 14ksame name
178 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository3 other files it gives its agents.
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- code-refactorSkill
- dev-brainstormSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
11 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 3 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 168 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
3
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 15
Always --signoff for DCO compliance
- Distinctive: line 60
Use body for "why" if needed
- Distinctive: line 68
When changes need more context, add a body:
- Distinctive: line 89
Use bullet points for lists
- Distinctive: line 103
Add exclamation mark (!) after type for breaking changes:
- Very specific: line 112
If user requests --no-verify:
- Distinctive: line 119
Only proceed if confirmed.
- Distinctive: line 160
Add Claude signature to commits
- Distinctive: line 161
Commit without checking staged status
- Distinctive: line 163
Use past tense ("added" -> "add")
- Very specific: line 173
Ask approval for --no-verify
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 168 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Commit Skill
Creates well-formatted commits following conventional commit standards.
Core Features
- Staged vs unstaged detection - commits only staged files when present
- Split suggestions - analyzes diffs for multiple logical changes
- Conventional commits format:
<type>: <description> - Pre-commit hook integration
- Always
--signofffor DCO compliance
Process
1. Analyze Changes
git status --short
# Prefer staged files if any exist
if ! git diff --staged --quiet; then
git diff --staged --stat
else
git diff HEAD --stat
fi2. Multi-Concern Detection
Suggest split if:
- Different patterns:
src/+test/+docs/ - Mixed types: feat + fix + docs
- Unrelated concerns: auth logic + UI styling
- Large changeset: >500 lines
Ask user:
Multiple concerns detected:
1. Auth changes (src/auth/*)
2. UI updates (src/components/*)
3. Docs (README.md)
Split into 3 commits?
- feat: add JWT authentication
- style: update login UI
- docs: update auth documentation
[split/all]3. Create Commit
Format: <type>: <description>
Rules:
- Imperative mood ("add" not "added")
- First line <72 chars
- Atomic (single purpose)
- Use body for "why" if needed
git commit --signoff -m "<type>: <description>"Commit Body Conventions
When changes need more context, add a body:
git commit --signoff -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
<type>: <description>
<body>
EOF
)"When to Include Body
- Multiple files changed
- Non-obvious reasoning
- Breaking changes
- Related issues/PRs
Body Format
- Blank line after subject
- Wrap at 72 chars
- Explain "why" not "what"
- Use bullet points for lists
Body Example
feat: add user authentication
- Implement JWT token validation
- Add protected routes middleware
- Include refresh token support
Closes #123Breaking Changes
Add exclamation mark (!) after type for breaking changes:
feat!: change API response format
BREAKING CHANGE: Response now returns { data, meta }
instead of flat object. Update all API consumers.4. Handle --no-verify
If user requests --no-verify:
Warning: Requested to skip pre-commit hooks.
Bypasses: linting, tests, formatting
Reason: [ask user]
Approve? [yes/no]Only proceed if confirmed.
Commit Types
| Type | Use Case |
| feat | New feature |
| fix | Bug fix |
| docs | Documentation |
| style | Formatting, styling |
| refactor | Code restructure |
| perf | Performance |
| test | Tests |
| chore | Build/tools |
| ci | CI/CD |
| security | Security fix |
| build | Build system |
| revert | Revert changes |
| wip | Work in progress |
Split Examples
Bad - Mixed concerns
+ src/auth/login.ts (feat)
+ src/components/Button.css (style)
+ README.md (docs)Split into: 3 separate commits
Good - Single concern
+ src/auth/login.ts
+ src/auth/middleware.ts
+ tests/auth.test.tsOne commit: feat: add authentication
Critical Rules
NEVER
- Add Claude signature to commits
- Commit without checking staged status
- Skip split suggestions for multi-concern
- Use past tense ("added" -> "add")
- Make first line >72 chars
- Bypass hooks without asking
ALWAYS
- Use --signoff flag
- Analyze diff before commit
- Suggest splits when appropriate
- Use imperative mood
- Pick correct type
- Ask approval for --no-verify
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

