deploy
Skill1 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub
Deploy a managed project to production, executed strictly from that project's structured deploy playbook — confirm-gated, never improvised. Use when the user says "deploy", "deploy <project>", "ship <project> to prod", "run the deploy", or "push <project> live". Reads the project's context.md + the deploy playbook it points to (e.g. a repo README "Deploy" section), presents the full ordered plan, then runs it one step at a time, pausing before each production-mutating step.
155 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflowtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- KingKongRobotics/jumpertheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- stakeme-team/arc-agent-kittheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- dockhold/mcptheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- KhaiTrang1995/nexus-kbtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- ribato22/vibechecktheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use pm-discovery, qa-phase and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
ww-w-aiSkillpm-discovery
PM Agent Team - Automated product discovery, strategy, and PRD generation. Runs PM analysis workflow to produce comprehensive PRD before PDCA Plan phase.
Also in 3 projects that use this
ww-w-aiSkillqa-phase
Run QA tests at various levels (L1-L5) for features under PDCA management. Integrates with MCP tools to execute structured test plans.
Also in 3 projects that use this
- +10 more from ww-w-ai
Other versions155 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 155
- ok-oldking/ok-wuthering-waves★ 8.6ksame name
- memovai/mimiclaw★ 5.8ksame name
- KingKongRobotics/jumper★ 3.1ksame name
- jhd3197/ServerKit★ 1.8ksame name
- pedrohcgs/claude-code-my-workflow★ 1.7ksame name
- mattmireles/gemma-tuner-multimodal★ 1.5ksame name
- microsoft/power-platform-skills★ 1.1ksame name
- jazzyalex/agent-sessions★ 941same name
- awslabs/agent-plugins★ 918same name
- patrickjaja/claude-desktop-extra★ 734same name
145 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository10 other files it gives its agents.
- designSkill
- docsSkill
- gateSkill
- groomSkill
- investigateSkill
- milestone-seedSkill
- milestone-wrapSkill
- opsSkill
- sync-guidelinesSkill
- wrapSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
10 rules. 0 are common, 8 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 139 edited versions we read keep these.
8
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 14
Run a project's production deploy by executing its documented, ordered playbook — confirm-gated and complete.
- Very specific: line 46
Read every precondition from the playbook and check it: change merged to dev + CI green, clean tree, correct host, correct runtime user, …
- Distinctive: line 53
Before running anything, enumerate the entire ordered step list to the human: for each step, the exact command, what it does, and whether …
- Very specific: line 58
Companion-deploy check: If the playbook declares companion deploys, compute the diff from the currently-deployed SHA (the prod checkout's …
- Distinctive: line 68
Run steps strictly in playbook order, one at a time:
- Distinctive: line 73
Never skip and never reorder: If a step is conditional and its condition is not met, say so explicitly and move on — don't silently drop it.
- Distinctive: line 77
If any step's real output diverges from what the playbook expects, stop and ask — do not adapt on the fly.
- Distinctive: line 82
Run the playbook's verification checks (health endpoint, unit/service state, deploy-health).
- Distinctive: line 87
If a step fails: stop, report exactly what failed with its output, and surface the playbook's
- Distinctive: line 101
The playbook is authoritative: Never improvise, reorder, or skip steps.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 139 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Deploy
Run a project's production deploy by executing its documented, ordered playbook — confirm-gated and complete. The whole point of this skill is that nothing important gets skipped and nothing gets improvised: the playbook is authoritative; if reality diverges from it, you stop and ask rather than guess.
Deploy touches production. Expect
sudo/systemctlsteps to raise approval prompts — that is correct and desired here (a human is present). Follow § Shell hygiene inprocedures.md: one command per Bash call,git -C <path>/sudo -u <user> …, nevercd <path> && ….
Step 0 — Identify the project and load its playbook
- Determine the target project (from the command argument, else ask).
Read config/projects/<dir>/context.md. - Locate the authoritative, ordered deploy playbook, in this order:
- the
## Deploymentsection ofcontext.md(structured per the playbook contract inprocedures.md→ Deployment — the/deployplaybook contract), and - the repo document it points to for exact commands (e.g. polimarket-analyser →
README.md§ Deploy a mergeddev+ Gotchas). Read it in full.
- the
- If the playbook is missing or an unauthored stub, do not deploy yet:
- No deploy section at all → STOP. Tell the human the project has no deploy playbook and
do not improvise one. Point them at the contract in
procedures.md. - A stub / unauthored placeholder (marked 🚧, or its parts are
TODOplaceholders) → switch to author-first mode: draft the playbook to the contract — from the repo's build/run docs, host runbooks, and.claude-orchestrator.yml— present it for human sign-off, and only run the deploy once it is authored and approved. Never deploy against stub placeholders.
- No deploy section at all → STOP. Tell the human the project has no deploy playbook and
do not improvise one. Point them at the contract in
Step 1 — Preconditions gate
Read every precondition from the playbook and check it: change merged to dev + CI green,
clean tree, correct host, correct runtime user, required access/keys present, the exact
<sha> being deployed. Report the checklist with pass/fail. If any precondition fails,
stop and report — do not proceed.
Step 2 — Present the full plan first
Before running anything, enumerate the entire ordered step list to the human: for each step, the exact command, what it does, and whether it is conditional (e.g. "only if the frontend changed"). This up-front plan is the "nothing gets skipped" checkpoint — the human sees and okays the whole sequence.
Companion-deploy check. If the playbook declares companion deploys, compute the diff
from the currently-deployed SHA (the prod checkout's VERSION / current /opt HEAD,
before the source-delivery step) to the target <sha> — git -C <checkout> diff --name-only
<deployed>..<sha>. For any companion whose declared path(s) appear in that diff, flag the
operator up front that that component (e.g. a sidecar on another host) likely needs its own
separate deploy. This is advisory only: never deploy or restart the companion yourself, and
don't check its live status. Restate any such flag in the Step 6 report.
Step 3 — Execute, confirm-gated, in order
Run steps strictly in playbook order, one at a time:
- Read-only / preview steps (e.g.
--dry-run) may run without pausing; always show output. - Before every production-mutating step: echo the exact command and its effect, and get explicit confirmation. Never batch multiple mutating steps behind one confirmation.
- Never skip and never reorder. If a step is conditional and its condition is not met, say so explicitly and move on — don't silently drop it.
- Honor every hazard the playbook lists (e.g. run as the runtime user, never
uvas root against/opt). - If any step's real output diverges from what the playbook expects, stop and ask — do not adapt on the fly.
Step 4 — Verify
Run the playbook's verification checks (health endpoint, unit/service state, deploy-health). Report results. If verification fails, surface it — do not declare success.
Step 5 — On failure
If a step fails: stop, report exactly what failed with its output, and surface the playbook's rollback / failure-handling guidance — including any "do NOT roll back, do X instead" cases (e.g. a post-migration GUC crash-loop that needs a pool recycle, not a rollback). Do not auto-rollback or improvise a fix without confirmation.
Step 6 — Report
Summarize: what was deployed (<sha>), which steps ran vs. were conditionally skipped,
verification results, and anything left for the human to watch.
Constraints
- The playbook is authoritative. Never improvise, reorder, or skip steps. Divergence → stop and ask.
- Confirm before every prod-mutating action. Reads/previews are free; writes are gated.
- Deploy runs the project's own documented deploy entrypoint — that is in-scope. It is not
a licence to hand-edit any other session's git/worktree/PR (see
procedures.md§ Hard rule).
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

