agentleFS
pfangueiropfangueiro/claude-code-agents/.claude/skills/repo-context/SKILL.md

repo-context

Skill7 starsChanged 22 days agoMITView on GitHub

Read-only onboarding discovery for an unfamiliar repository or archive. Reports the owning Git root, HEAD and dirty state, instruction files, Node/Python/Go manifests (including mixed and nested layouts), declared toolchains, test declarations and command candidates as data, with malformed or undeclared facts listed as explicit unknowns. Use when starting work in a repository, before choosing build or test commands, or when asked what a project uses. It never executes candidates, guesses a package manager, default branch or CI gate, or reads credentials or the environment.

4 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

3 rules. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 4 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 2

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Read every listed instruction file.

    line 35
  2. Very specific:

    Treat defaultBranch: null, ci.gates: null and packageManager: null as unknowns to confirm from instructions or the user.

    line 37
  3. Very specific:

    Treat every candidate as unverified until it runs.

    line 43

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 4 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Repo Context

Establish facts about a repository before acting on assumptions about it.

Run

python3 scripts/repo_context.py --cwd <directory>

The script prints one JSON document. It runs only read-only git queries that execute no repository-configured command, follows no symlink at any path component, skips dependency and build directories, and never runs the commands it lists.

Read the result

FieldMeaning
sourcegit (root, HEAD, branch, dirty counts) or archive-or-unversioned
scanDepth/directory budget, directories visited, depth-pruned and count-truncated
instructionsInstruction and rule files with size and SHA-256; content is not copied
ecosystemsPer-directory Node, Python, Go and Makefile declarations
commandCandidatesargv + basis + executed: false; argv: null when blocked
ciCI files present; gates is always null because files are not interpreted
unknownsFixed reason codes such as invalid-json, symlink-not-followed
executionStillNeededWhat must still be run or confirmed

Reconcile before acting

  1. Read every listed instruction file. When instructions and discovered facts disagree, the instructions win; report the conflict instead of silently choosing.
  2. Treat defaultBranch: null, ci.gates: null and packageManager: null as unknowns to confirm from instructions or the user. Do not infer them from lockfiles, conventions or localOriginHead.
  3. dirty: null with dirty-state-uninspected-content-filters means a tracked path is routed through a configured filter driver; checking it would run that driver's command, so it was not checked. Establish the state by a means you trust.
  4. Treat every candidate as unverified until it runs. Record runs with the verified-handoff skill so the result is backed by a receipt.
  5. For an archive-or-unversioned source, describe the source explicitly (name and digest) wherever a commit would otherwise be cited.
  6. Resolve each entry in unknowns before relying on the declaration it affects; directory-scan-depth-limit or directory-scan-count-limit means declarations may exist beyond the scanned tree.

Limits

  • Discovery is bounded (depth 4, 5000 directories, 1 MiB per file). _test.go counts cover only the scanned tree. Submodule state is not inspected.
  • Declared facts are not installed facts: toolchain versions and dependencies must still be confirmed in the target environment.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.