agentleFS
petera2cpetera2c/simple-table/.agents/skills/keyword-clustering/SKILL.md

keyword-clustering

Skill233 starsChanged 3 months agoMITView on GitHub

Cluster keywords by intent and map them to existing or proposed pages.

14 other projects use a version of this, 6 of them edited.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use openseo-release-notes, openseo-review-web-content and 5 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • JwuthriSkill

    openseo-release-notes

    Cut an OpenSEO release — bump the version, draft user-facing release notes from commits since the last tag, run a review + subagent-verification pass, and open a "release: vX.X.X" PR. Use when the user asks to prepare a release, bump the version, or write release notes.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • JwuthriSkill

    openseo-review-web-content

    Write and review content for the OpenSEO website (web/) — blog posts, guides, feature pages, FAQs. Distills the philosophy for on-brand, useful, accurate content. Use whenever adding or editing user-facing prose in web/content or web/src.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • huiferSkill

    local-seo

    本地 SEO 分析和优化专家。自动检测项目是否需要本地 SEO,分析 NAP(Name, Address, Phone)一致性、本地关键词优化、Google Business Profile (GBP) 优化和本地结构化数据生成。提供本地商家搜索引擎排名优化建议,包括 NAP 标准化、本地关键词策略、GBP 完整性检查、评论策略、地图嵌入和本地 SEO 审计。

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • ten9876Skill

    papercuts

    Read-only AetherSDR issue triage that surfaces the UX papercuts, bugs, and regressions you can fix AND prove today with the agent automation bridge. Use when the user says $papercuts or /papercuts, or asks to "find papercuts", "what can I fix and prove today", "triage bridge-provable issues", "what UX bugs can the bridge close", "sort issues by priority I can knock out", or otherwise wants a curated, lifecycle-aware (design→code→prove) shortlist of issues — NOT the label-and-respond /triage workflow. This is the discovery step that feeds /fb. Strictly read-only: it never labels, comments, closes, or edits issues.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • 01claudingSkill

    seo-report

    SEO reporting and analytics dashboard generation. Creates weekly digests, monthly performance reports, quarterly strategy reviews, and real-time dashboard templates. Use when user says "SEO report", "weekly digest", "monthly report", "dashboard", "SEO metrics", "performance summary".

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • +2 more from Jwuthri

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

12 rules. 4 are common, 3 are distinctive, and 5 are very specific to this project.

  • 4

    Common

    Most of the 9 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 3

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 5

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Very specific:

    If keywords are not provided, use list_saved_keywords for saved sets, research_keywords for seed discovery, or get_ranked_keywords when the …

    line 18
  2. Very specific:

    Use get_search_console_performance (dimensions ["query","page"]) when Search Console is connected to start from real queries and the pages …

    line 33
  3. Very specific:

    Use get_ranked_keywords for domain/page-driven clustering.

    line 34
  4. Very specific:

    Use search_local_businesses and get_local_serp_results when proximity, local packs, or Google Business results determine whether terms …

    line 35
  5. Common:

    Remove duplicates, irrelevant terms, and terms that clearly require a different product or audience.

    line 36
  6. Distinctive:

    Do-not-target / later bucket, if weak or off-strategy

    line 45
  7. Very specific:

    Ask before applying cluster tags with save_keywords.

    line 47
  8. Distinctive:

    Start with a short mapping summary:

    line 51
  9. Common:

    Do not over-cluster tiny keyword sets.

    line 73
  10. Common:

    Do not rely on lexical similarity alone.

    line 74
  11. Distinctive:

    Do not replace tags broadly without explicit confirmation.

    line 75
  12. Common:

    If existing URL data is missing, label target pages as proposed.

    line 76

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 9 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

OpenSEO Keyword Clustering

Goal

Group keywords into page-level clusters and decide which existing or new page should target each cluster. This is a keyword mapping workflow, not just a semantic grouping exercise.

Required inputs

  • projectId
  • A keyword list, saved keyword tag, seed topic, or target domain
  • Optional existing URLs/pages to map against

If keywords are not provided, use list_saved_keywords for saved sets, research_keywords for seed discovery, or get_ranked_keywords when the user starts from a target domain.

OpenSEO MCP tools

  • list_saved_keywords: fetch an existing keyword set, optionally filtered by tags.
  • research_keywords: expand a seed when the user starts from a topic.
  • get_ranked_keywords: gather exact ranking keywords and URLs when the user starts from a domain or page.
  • get_search_console_performance: when Search Console is connected, pull real queries with dimensions: ["query","page"] to map terms to the pages already earning impressions and to surface cannibalization (one query splitting clicks across multiple URLs).
  • get_serp_results: validate whether keywords belong on the same page by checking SERP overlap and intent.
  • get_local_serp_results: use for local SEO clusters when Maps/local-pack intent should affect page mapping.
  • save_keywords: optionally tag final clusters after user confirmation.

Workflow

  1. Gather the candidate keyword set.
    • Use get_search_console_performance (dimensions ["query","page"]) when Search Console is connected to start from real queries and the pages already ranking for them.
    • Use get_ranked_keywords for domain/page-driven clustering.
    • Use search_local_businesses and get_local_serp_results when proximity, local packs, or Google Business results determine whether terms belong on location pages.
  2. Remove duplicates, irrelevant terms, and terms that clearly require a different product or audience.
  3. Build clusters around intent and page type:
    • Same SERP intent and similar ranking pages belong together.
    • Different intent, buyer stage, or SERP format should be split.
    • Similar words do not guarantee the same cluster.
  4. For important borderline terms, use a small get_serp_results batch to check overlap.
  5. Assign each cluster to:
    • Existing URL, if supplied and appropriate
    • New page recommendation, if no existing page fits
    • Do-not-target / later bucket, if weak or off-strategy
  6. Identify cannibalization risk when multiple pages would target the same intent. When Search Console is connected, confirm it from real data with get_search_console_performance (dimensions: ["query","page"]) — the same query sending impressions to multiple URLs.
  7. Ask before applying cluster tags with save_keywords.

Output format

Start with a short mapping summary:

  • Number of clusters
  • Pages to create
  • Existing pages to update
  • Cannibalization or consolidation issues

Then include:

ClusterPrimary keywordSecondary keywordsIntentTarget pagePriorityNotes

For each cluster, include a recommended page brief:

  • Page type
  • Searcher problem
  • Required sections
  • Internal-link opportunities
  • Save/tag suggestion

Guardrails

  • Do not over-cluster tiny keyword sets. If there are fewer than 10 usable terms, produce a simple map.
  • Do not rely on lexical similarity alone. SERP intent wins.
  • Do not replace tags broadly without explicit confirmation.
  • If existing URL data is missing, label target pages as proposed.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.