eval
Skill0 starsChanged 45 days agoMITView on GitHub
Measure a photo prompt with the local model, score it against the labels, and compare it with the prompt that ships.
41 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- jisuzzzz/haechitheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Integralist/agent-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 6, 2026
- DataChuLee/Claude-Code-Settingtheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- jh941213/my-cc-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- jh941213/ADLC-harnesstheir own version, first seen Nov 1, 2026
- julienamorgan/signal-prospecting-kittheir own version, first seen Oct 25, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use docs-ci, docs-interfaces and 10 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
jh941213Skilldocs-ci
문서 CI(링크·OpenAPI lint·breaking 게이트·mermaid 검증)나 문서 드리프트 감지(docs.yaml 신선도 검사)를 설치하거나 돌릴 때 사용. 문서 내용 작성은 docs-architecture·docs-interfaces·docs-manuals.
Also in 3 projects that use this
jh941213Skilldocs-interfaces
API·이벤트 인터페이스 문서(OpenAPI·swagger·AsyncAPI 명세, 엔드포인트 레퍼런스, API 구성도·시퀀스, API CHANGELOG)를 만들거나 코드와 맞출 때 사용. 시스템 구성도는 docs-architecture, API 설계 원칙은 api-design-principles.
Also in 3 projects that use this
open-coder-aiSkillpolicy-init
Create conformant Chock policy from request. args(request, target_path,
Also in 3 projects that use this
TheKREATORSSkillinstinct-export
Export instincts from project/global scope to a file
Also in 3 projects that use this
TheKREATORSSkillinstinct-import
Import instincts from file or URL into project/global scope
Also in 3 projects that use this
diego-tobalinaSkillbuild-fix
Fix build and compilation errors systematically. Run when build fails.
Also in 6 projects that use this
- +4 more from jh941213
Other versions41 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 41
- PrimeIntellect-ai/prime-rl★ 2.2ksame name
- rohanpsingh/LearningHumanoidWalking★ 1.2ksame name
- mikeyobrien/rho★ 372same name
- ai-analyst-lab/ai-analyst★ 304same name
- jh941213/ADLC-harness★ 125same name
- jh941213/my-cc-harness★ 125same name
- jh941213/my-claude-code-asset★ 125same name
- qtzx06/yolodex★ 96same name
- Kastalien-Research/thoughtbox★ 64same name
- Kanevry/session-orchestrator★ 53same name
31 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- AGENTS.mdAGENTS.md
- CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- content/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- evals/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- scripts/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- seed/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- static/CLAUDE.mdCLAUDE.md
- checkSkill
- rebrandSkill
- resetSkill
- screenshotsSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
2 rules. 0 are common, 0 are distinctive, and 2 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 32 edited versions we read keep these.
0
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
2
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 9
Read evals/CLAUDE.md first: it has the rules.
- Very specific: line 13
A new prompt is a new file: Write it as the next evals/prompts/vN.txt, holding exactly the text the model should see.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 32 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Prompt to measure: $ARGUMENTS (if empty, the prompt in classifier.py, which is the newest file in evals/prompts/).
Read evals/CLAUDE.md first: it has the rules. The short version is to tune on the dev set, look at the holdout once per candidate you'd ship, and never change a label to move a score.
- Check this machine can run the model. It needs Apple silicon (
uname -smgivesDarwin arm64) and about 8 GB free. If it can't, stop and offer to re-score the existing runs instead, which needs no model. - Free the memory. Two copies of the 12B model don't fit in 16 GB. If
curl -s http://localhost:8800/api/healthshows the app running with"mode": "gemma", ask the user before stopping it, or restart it withFT_CLASSIFIER=cache scripts/start_server.sh. - A new prompt is a new file. Write it as the next
evals/prompts/vN.txt, holding exactly the text the model should see. Past versions are fixed, because their runs record a hash of them. - Run it in the background, since it takes about 14 seconds a photo:
uv run --extra gemma python evals/run.py evals/runs/$(date +%F)/vN.json --prompt evals/prompts/vN.txt --sets dev. Addholdoutonly for a candidate you'd ship. Addreal --real-dir <folder>if the user has the real photos, which aren't in the repository. - Score it against the shipped prompt's latest run:
uv run python evals/score.py evals/runs/<date>/vN.json <the shipped prompt's run>. For what changed, use--set dev --missesand--set dev --sizes. - Report the table, the photos that got better or worse, and whether it beats the shipped prompt on decisions and hazards caught as well as on size. Size alone isn't a reason to ship.
- Only if the user decides to ship it: copy the text into
classifier.PROMPTexactly, run it on the holdout set if you haven't, update the tables indocs/EVALS.mdfromevals/score.py, and runuv run python tests/test_units.py, whose eval checks confirm the shipped prompt is measured on today's photos.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

