interview-prep
Skill2 starsChanged 34 days agoMITView on GitHub
Build a prep brief for an upcoming job interview. Use whenever the user asks to prep for an interview or a call with a company they're interviewing at, or names a company and a time ("prep me for the Acme call," "what do I need for my interview today," "help me get ready for tomorrow's panel"), or asks to practice or run a mock interview. Covers recruiter screens, hiring manager calls, panels, case or technical rounds, presentations, and work trials. Not for internal meetings, client calls, or general calendar questions.
56 other projects use a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- fancyboi999/ai-engineering-from-scratch-zhtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- rohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratchtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- nisarth/claude-skills-storetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- eggs-gd/career-spacetheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- Gianni03/jobtracker-skillstheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
- surfmind-space/awesome-surfmindtheir own version, first seen Nov 8, 2026
Used with
Projects with it also use application-tracker, interview-debrief and 9 more.
Other files people use alongside this one.
Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
xiding-codeSkillapplication-tracker
Automatically log and track all job applications submitted. Use this skill after every application submission to record the details in a tracking spreadsheet and save relevant documents. Also trigger when the user asks "application status", "what have I applied to", "tracking", or wants to review their application history. Maintains a single source of truth for all job search activity.
Also in 4 projects that use this
jackhendonSkillinterview-debrief
Structure notes from a user research session into a clean debrief with insights, quotes, and implications. Paste your raw notes in and get a formatted summary ready for Notion.
Also in 3 projects that use this
proficientlyjobsSkilljob-search
Search for jobs matching my resume and preferences
Also in 9 projects that use this
claude-office-skillsSkillcover-letter
>
Also in 7 projects that use this
xiding-codeSkillcover-letter-writer
Write and iteratively refine cover letters using a 3-agent debate team (2 Opus critics + 1 Sonnet judge). Use this skill whenever a job application allows cover letter upload, whenever the user asks to write or improve a cover letter, or whenever the job-screener skill returns APPLY for a position. The must-write rule (if enabled in config) applies: if the application system has a cover letter upload field, a cover letter MUST be written. Trigger on: "write cover letter", "cover letter", any application form with a cover letter upload option, or after a job-screener APPLY decision.
Also in 3 projects that use this
claude-office-skillsSkillcompany-research
Conduct comprehensive company research and due diligence. Analyze business model, competitive landscape, management, and market position.
Also in 5 projects that use this
Other versions56 projects use a version of this.
Word for word · 0
None found.
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 56
- rohitg00/ai-engineering-from-scratch★ 78ksame name
- anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins★ 35ksame name
- tinyfish-io/tinyfish-cookbook★ 2.3ksame name
- ShenSeanChen/waku-agent★ 2ksame name
- fancyboi999/ai-engineering-from-scratch-zh★ 1.3ksame name
- jerry-ai-dev/MODULAR-RAG-MCP-SERVER★ 1.2ksame name
- lan1177/interview-prep★ 92same name
- matyasstoch/david-skills★ 59same name
- muggl3mind/career-manager★ 24same name
- jaskirat1616/grok-skills★ 22same name
46 more not listed
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository2 other files it gives its agents.
- pipeline-trackerSkill
- resume-tailorSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
12 rules. 0 are common, 12 are distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.
0
Common
Most of the 48 edited versions we read keep these.
12
Distinctive
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
0
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Distinctive: line 16
Use whatever sources are available and skip the ones that aren't.
- Distinctive: line 24
If a calendar is connected, search today (or the day they name) for events with an outside company's domain, a video link, "interview" in …
- Distinctive: line 34
No calendar: ask for company, role, interviewer names, round type, and time.
- Distinctive: line 42
Email: Search the company's domain and the recruiter's name.
- Distinctive: line 93
Deeper on what they've already read: If the user submitted written work, likely follow-ups per answer.
- Distinctive: line 117
When the user asks to practice, rehearse, or run a mock interview (or after delivering a brief, if they have time), interview them instead …
- Distinctive: line 121
Ask one question at a time, in the interviewer's likely style, and wait for the answer.
- Distinctive: line 124
After each answer give brief, specific feedback: what landed, what was missing (the result, the user's own role, the number), and what to …
- Distinctive: line 126
Don't rewrite the answer into a script.
- Distinctive: line 138
When a strong answer needs a fact you don't have, mark it as a blank for them to fill.
- Distinctive: line 142
If the recruiter said no prep is needed, say so plainly and warn that over-rehearsed answers read badly in a judgment interview.
- Distinctive: line 146
No em dashes in the brief.
“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 48 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Interview Prep
Produce a prep brief for the user's upcoming job interview. Three parts, in this order: a one-screen cheat sheet, a full brief, and likely questions with draft answers built from their real background. Then, if they want it, a mock interview (see Practice mode).
People often interview at several companies at once. Never assume which one they mean if more than one is plausible.
Use whatever sources are available and skip the ones that aren't. The steps below name kinds of tools (calendar, email, notes, file storage, web), not specific products. With no connectors at all, ask the user for the three things that matter most: the job posting, their resume, and anything the recruiter sent about the round.
Step 1: Find the interview
If a calendar is connected, search today (or the day they name) for events with an outside company's domain, a video link, "interview" in the title, or an organizer from a recruiting scheduler. If more than one interview shows up, ask which one before doing the work.
Pull from the event: exact time and time zone, duration, join link, passcode, dial-in, interviewer names and titles, recruiter name, and any recording or notetaker disclosure. Note how long they have until the call at the top of the brief.
No calendar: ask for company, role, interviewer names, round type, and time.
Step 2: Gather context (in parallel where you can)
- Their background. The resume version they sent this company, if you can find it, otherwise their current resume. This is the source for every talking point and draft answer. If you can't get a resume, ask for one before writing answers.
- Email. Search the company's domain and the recruiter's name. Read full threads, not snippets. The recruiter's prep email is the single highest-value source: it often says outright what the interviewer is evaluating and how the session runs. Quote that framing in the brief.
- Meeting notes from earlier rounds with this company, if they keep them. Recruiter screens often surface team size, org structure, comp range, process stages, and timeline. All of it belongs in the brief.
- Submitted work. Any take-home, questionnaire, portfolio, or written exercise they sent. If the interviewer has read it, every answer in it is fair game for follow-ups.
- The job posting. What it asks for, and where their background is thin against it.
- Web search. The specific interviewer (talks, podcasts, posts, papers) and the company's recent launches and news. Interviewer research is what makes this brief better than one they'd write themselves. Cite sources, and be careful with common names: if you aren't sure a result is the same person, say so or leave it out.
Step 3: Write the brief
Save as {Company}_{Interviewer}_Prep_{YYYY-MM-DD}.md, cheat sheet first.
Cheat sheet (top of file, fits one screen)
Scannable during the call. No prose paragraphs.
- Time, join link, passcode
- Interviewer name and title
- One line on what they're evaluating
- 3-5 bullets: strongest talking points, compressed
- 3 questions to ask them
- 2-3 watch-outs
Full brief
- The one thing to know. What this round is testing, in the recruiter's own words where available, plus the failure mode and the win condition.
- Who you're talking to. Interviewer background and publicly stated views. Frame these as things to echo naturally, not parrot. Flag any stated view that contradicts the standard answer in the user's field (an interviewer publicly skeptical of a common practice will hear the textbook answer as evasion).
- Where the company is right now. Recent launches, strategic shifts, org shape, team size. Connect it to why this role exists.
- Your material. Which of their projects to lead with and why, each shaped as: situation, the judgment call, what happened. Use the specific numbers from their resume. Anticipate the follow-up question for each.
- Gaps. Where the posting asks for something their background doesn't clearly show, and the honest way to address it if asked.
- Exercise approach (if a live problem, case, or presentation is expected). Ordered tactics for this format, not generic advice.
- Deeper on what they've already read. If the user submitted written work, likely follow-ups per answer.
- Questions for them. 4-6, calibrated to what this interviewer cares about. Nothing answerable from the careers page.
- Watch-outs. Including anything not to raise unless they do (comp, competing offers).
- What comes after. Remaining stages and timeline if known, so a hard round doesn't read as a bad one.
- Close with any other interviews on their calendar that day.
Likely questions with draft answers
8-12 questions this interviewer plausibly asks, each with a bulleted answer drawn from the user's actual history. Bullets, not scripts, so they can rehearse the substance without sounding rehearsed. Cover: the recent-work walkthrough, a failure or a changed mind, why this company, why they're leaving or left their last role, and whatever the round's format demands (case, technical depth, portfolio review, behavioral).
For "why are you leaving," use only what the user has told you. If you don't know, leave a prompt for them to fill in rather than writing a reason.
Practice mode
When the user asks to practice, rehearse, or run a mock interview (or after delivering a brief, if they have time), interview them instead of handing over more reading:
- Ask one question at a time, in the interviewer's likely style, and wait for the answer. Follow up the way a real interviewer would, on whatever was vague or most interesting.
- After each answer give brief, specific feedback: what landed, what was missing (the result, the user's own role, the number), and what to cut. Don't rewrite the answer into a script. Offer to let them try again.
- Push on weak spots from the brief's gaps and watch-outs. A comfortable mock doesn't help.
- End with the two or three things to fix before the real call.
This needs no connectors, so it's the most useful mode for someone with only a job posting and a resume.
Standing rules
- Never invent an accomplishment, metric, or detail. Everything traces to their resume, their submitted work, their notes, or a cited source. When a strong answer needs a fact you don't have, mark it as a blank for them to fill.
- Say what you couldn't find. "No public material on this interviewer" is more useful than padding.
- If the recruiter said no prep is needed, say so plainly and warn that over-rehearsed answers read badly in a judgment interview.
- Comp stays parked unless the interviewer opens it or the round is explicitly a comp conversation. Include any known range for awareness.
- No em dashes in the brief. Use commas, colons, or periods.
- Specific beats comprehensive. A brief they can absorb in ten minutes is better than one they skim.
- Deliver the file and keep the chat summary to a few lines. They're usually reading this shortly before the call.
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

