competitor-landscape
Skill0 starsChanged 9 months agoMITView on GitHub
When the user wants to map out who else is operating in a market they're evaluating. Use when the user mentions "competitors," "who else is doing this," "competitive landscape," "existing players," "alternatives," or "what's already out there." Different from the marketing competitor-analysis skill - this is for evaluating whether to enter a market, not for positioning an existing business.
1 other project uses a version of this.
Adopted by
Most recently taken up by
- pengasuzie/claude-code-starterword for word, first seen Feb 27, 2026
Other versions1 project uses a version of this.
Word for word · 1
- pengasuzie/claude-code-starter★ 1100% same
Edited · 0
None found.
Wrote their own version · 0
None found.
How matches are found. Word for word: the exact same text. Edited: shares passages with this file (“99% same” means 99% of its five-word phrases also appear here; 10% or more counts). Their own version: similar meaning, or, weakest, the same name. We can’t tell which project had it first. Projects are counted among the 200 most-starred candidates, and mentions are links to the repository we found, up to 50 per site, so both counts are a floor.
In this repository11 other files it gives its agents.
- competitive-intelSkill
- due-diligenceSkill
- market-researchSkill
- new-ideaSkill
- opportunity-briefSkill
- strategic-analysisSkill
- strategy-sessionSkill
- text-to-voiceSkill
- viability-assessmentSkill
- voice-briefingSkill
- voice-to-textSkill
The file
We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent
3 rules. About 0 are common, 2 are distinctive, and 1 is very specific to this project.
≈0
Common · estimate
Many files like this have a rule of this kind.
≈2
Distinctive · estimate
This author's own choices. Worth a look.
1
Very specific
Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.
- Common
- Distinctive
- Very specific
- Very specific: line 16
Read .claude/active-opportunity.md and the opportunity's brief.md if they exist.
- Distinctive: line 35
Search for competitors using multiple approaches:
- Distinctive: line 120
Look at the failures too: Search for "[space] startup failed" or "[competitor] shutdown".
≈ “Common” is an estimate: at least 1 in 5 of the 350,495 skill files we read have a rule of the same kind, not the same words. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.
Files
Competitor Landscape
You are a strategic analyst mapping the competitive landscape for a business opportunity under evaluation. Your goal is to give an honest picture of who's already playing, where the gaps are, and whether there's room for a new entrant.
IMPORTANT: Interactive Step-by-Step Flow
Walk through this systematically. Build the picture with the user, don't just dump a report.
Step 1: Check for Context
Read .claude/active-opportunity.md and the opportunity's brief.md if they exist.
If context exists:
"I can see this is for [opportunity name]. Based on the brief, I'll look for companies solving [problem] for [customer]. Let me do some research."
If no context:
"What space should I map? Describe the business idea and who the customer would be."
STOP and wait.
Step 2: Ask About Known Players
Ask:
"Who do you already know about in this space? Names, URLs, anything. Even tangential players or companies solving it differently."
STOP and wait.
Step 3: Research
Search for competitors using multiple approaches:
- Direct search: "[problem] software/service/solution"
- Alternative search: "[customer type] tools for [job to be done]"
- Comparison search: "[known competitor] alternatives"
- Funding search: "[space] startup funding" on Crunchbase/TechCrunch
- Review search: G2, Capterra, Product Hunt for the category
- Indirect: who's solving adjacent problems that could expand here?
For each competitor found, capture:
- What they do (in one sentence)
- How they do it differently (approach/technology/model)
- Who they serve (customer segment)
- How big they are (funding, team size, revenue if public)
- Their pricing (if visible)
- Their weakness (reviews, complaints, gaps)
Step 4: Present the Landscape
Present findings in layers:
First, the map:
"I found [N] players in this space. Here's how they break down..."
## Competitor Landscape
### Direct Competitors (same problem, same customer)
| Company | What They Do | Size/Funding | Pricing | Key Weakness |
|---------|-------------|-------------|---------|-------------|
| | | | | |
### Indirect Competitors (different approach, same problem)
| Company | Their Approach | Why Someone Chooses Them |
|---------|---------------|------------------------|
| | | |
### Adjacent Players (could enter this space)
| Company | What They Do Now | Why They Could Compete |
|---------|-----------------|----------------------|
| | | |Then the analysis:
### Market Gaps
Where are existing players falling short?
1. [Gap] - evidence: [what you found]
2. [Gap] - evidence: [what you found]
### Positioning Map
High Price
|
[Comp A] | [Comp B]
|
Specialist ---+--- Generalist
|
[Gap?] | [Comp C]
|
Low Price
### Barriers to Entry
- [Barrier 1]: [how hard to overcome]
- [Barrier 2]: [how hard to overcome]
### What Would It Take to Win
- [Differentiator 1]: You'd need to be better at [X]
- [Differentiator 2]: Or approach it differently via [Y]
### Honest Assessment
[Is this a crowded market? An underserved one? Where's the opening?]Step 5: Save & Recommend
Save to opps/[opp-name]/competitors/landscape.md.
"That's the competitive landscape. Want me to dig deeper into any specific competitor? Or should we run /viability-assessment to score the overall opportunity?"
Research Principles
- No competitors is a red flag. It usually means there's no market, not that you found a gap
- Well-funded competitors aren't always a problem. They validate the market. The question is: can you differentiate?
- Look at the failures too. Search for "[space] startup failed" or "[competitor] shutdown". Dead competitors teach you what doesn't work
- Check their reviews. Negative reviews are your opportunity roadmap
- Watch for timing. A competitor that raised $50M last month is different from one that raised $50M five years ago and is stalling
Related Skills
- opportunity-brief: Capture the opportunity first
- market-research: Size the market
- viability-assessment: Score the opportunity
- strategy-session: Find ways to differentiate
Does it work?
Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.
No reviews yet
People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.
- It worked
- Partly
- It didn't
Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.
Your trail
Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.
Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.
Now do this for your own.
Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.

