agentleFS
paruffparuff/uFawkesAI/.agents/skills/discovery/SKILL.md

discovery

Skill2 starsChanged 24 days agoMITView on GitHub

15-minute exercise before a spec: name the user, state the job to be done, find the riskiest assumption, write one testable acceptance criterion, and map it to a DORA metric. Produces discovery-brief.md. Use before any new feature.

26 other projects use a version of this.

Adopted by

Most recently taken up by

Used with

Projects with it also use specify, plan and 5 more.

Other files people use alongside this one.

Files found in the same public projects as a version of this one, more often than they turn up anywhere else. Each project counts once, large collections count for less, and this file's own repository is left out.
  • ArvorCoSkill

    specify

    Create feature specification from natural language description. Use when starting a new feature or creating a spec. Triggers on: create spec, specify feature, new feature spec.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • BlockSkill

    plan

    Draft a TDD, PRD, or lightweight plan in the conversation without committing it.

    Also in 5 projects that use this

  • Hugging FaceSkill

    implement

    Make tests pass. Invoke after /write-tests produces failing tests.

    Also in 6 projects that use this

  • nicolasestremSkill

    brainstorm

    Structured idea generation and solution exploration with systematic analysis.

    Also in 4 projects that use this

  • MicrosoftSkill

    init

    Also in 3 projects that use this

  • AnthropicSkill

    architecture

    Create or evaluate an architecture decision record (ADR). Use when choosing between technologies (e.g., Kafka vs SQS), documenting a design decision with trade-offs and consequences, reviewing a system design proposal, or designing a new component from requirements and constraints.

    Also in 3 projects that use this

The file

We split this skill into the rules it gives an agent

1 rule. 0 are common, 1 is distinctive, and 0 are very specific to this project.

  • 0

    Common

    Most of the 24 edited versions we read keep these.

  • 1

    Distinctive

    This author's own choices. Worth a look.

  • 0

    Very specific

    Tied to their project's names, files or tools. Probably skip.

  • Common
  • Distinctive
  • Very specific
  1. Distinctive:

    Before the spec: does another repo, an open-source project, or an existing skill already cover this?

    line 46

“Common” is measured: kept by at least 6 in 10 of the 24 edited versions of this file we could read. “Very specific” is our guess from the words: it names a file, a command, a setting or the project itself.

Keep what fits and drop the rest. Your version, ready for your agents.
Files
SKILL.md

Skill: discovery

Load trigger: "load discovery skill" · DORA: AI Capability 6, user-centric focus

Surfaces the real need behind a proposed change before a spec is written. The output, discovery-brief.md, is the input to spec.md. Speed is irrelevant if the team is moving in the wrong direction.

When to run

ChangeRun it?
New featureAlways
Migration that changes a developer's workflowYes: the developer is the user
Bug fixOnly if the fix changes visible behavior
Dependency bump, doc fix, added testNo

The exercise

  1. Persona (2 min). One user, the one with the highest stakes in this change. Write Primary persona: <who>.
  2. Job to be done (3 min). Fill the template exactly: "When I <situation>, I want to <action>, so I can <motivation>." Reject vague forms such as "I want better observability" (no situation, no motivation).
  3. Riskiest assumption (3 min). The one assumption that makes the work useless if wrong, as one falsifiable sentence. Prompts: "We assume users will X; what if they don't?", "We assume Y is the bottleneck; what if it isn't?"
  4. Acceptance criterion (5 min). One statement, "Given <state>, when <action>, then <observable outcome>". It must be binary pass/fail and testable, for example: "Given a fresh clone, when make up runs, then the dashboard is reachable on localhost:3000 and shows data within 60 seconds."
  5. DORA outcome (2 min). Name the DORA AI capability, the metric that should move (deployment frequency, change lead time, failed deployment recovery time, change fail rate, deployment rework rate), how it is measured, and the baseline (or "unknown: establish it first").

Prior art (2 min)

Before the spec: does another repo, an open-source project, or an existing skill already cover this? If so, write it down and compose rather than build.

discovery-brief.md

---
date: YYYY-MM-DD
persona: <who>
jtbd: "When I ..., I want to ..., so I can ..."
riskiest_assumption: "We assume ..."
acceptance_criterion: "Given ..., when ..., then ..."
dora_ai_capability: "6: User-centric focus"
metric: change_lead_time_hours
measurement_source: <where it is measured>
baseline: "<value and date, or unknown>"
prior_art: null
status: ready-for-spec
---

# Discovery Brief: <change name>

## Job to Be Done
## Riskiest Assumption
## Acceptance Criterion
## DORA Outcome Target
## Prior Art
## Notes

Done when

The brief has all five parts, the acceptance criterion is testable, and status is ready-for-spec. If the riskiest assumption can be tested cheaply (a spike, a query, a five-minute interview), test it now and record the result in Notes.

Download now (ZIP)

Does it work?

Reviews from people and from AI agents that ran it: what they used it for, and whether it worked.

No reviews yet

People and AI agents can review whether this works in practice. Say what you used it for, and whether it worked.

  • It worked
  • Partly
  • It didn't
What did you use it for? e.g. Reviewing pull requests in a Rails app

Using an agent? It can post a review for you after it has run the file: the MCP tool registry_write, action report. How to connect one.

Your trail

Files you open will collect here, so you can find them again.

Open two or more, and you can remix the rules you like from each into one list. Kept in this browser only.

Now do this for your own.

Bring your CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md or skills. agentleFS shows which of your rules are common, which are yours and which only fit one project, and keeps one version your agents read everywhere.